Dantonian_Rarstiana wrote: »PC = A better player experience if you take the game even a little bit seriously.
Console = A better player experience if you play 100% casually.
A little bit faster than currently.
That's it a little bit.
((TotalPoints / (Cap ^ 0.995)) + 0.085) * 400000
Is the formula used for under Cap, there is a slight modification for being over cap which I don't personally have as it has never been a concern for going over.
Here is a spreadsheet I made that for 0-561 CP, I just added a column for the new 600 CP cap. It was accurate at my last check when I switched it to 561 from 531.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yIkVrDEHbtvk7894bENGMWLPcOExBY8I6GdnIcPs5bw
561 cap... At 330 CP the next CP will cost ~276,859 exp and the total of all the CP you have already earned is 51,032,843 exp.
600 cap...At 330 CP the next CP will cost ~261,150 exp and the total of all the CP you have already earned is 48,435,526 exp.
So you will save roughly an hour of enlightened gameplay over the course of 330 CP.
Dantonian_Rarstiana wrote: »PC = A better player experience if you take the game even a little bit seriously.
Console = A better player experience if you play 100% casually.
Add-ons are just handicaps for plebs. It's like using a GameShark to beat goldeneye. Stick with console.
[SNIp]
Addons do not allow you to do anything that you cannot do yourself. Yet you compare something like a minimap or a more convenient inventory, mail/guild/trade management tools to a blatant cheat/hack? Just shows how greatly educated some console folks really are.
[Edited for bait]
I played on Xbox One, went to PC went back to Xbox One. While the graphics are nicer on PC it all depends on the PC you have. While I never used mods or ad-ons, you might have a lot of slowdowns you might not be aware of from Xbox One. Just wanted to bring that out.
So it really means is it worth for you to have those ad-ons? It will take you a while to get you where you are now. Good thing is, you won't loose your Xbox One character and it will always be there for you when you want to come back.
So question is, how much are you willing to pay to get these ad-ons? Also how much time are you willing to redo everything as well?
For the game to have worse performance and slowdowns than XB1, you really would need to have a 10+ year old tater.
My wife plays on a bogstandard Acer laptop with i5 5200 and GT 840, 8GB RAM and performance is buttery smooth on med-high settings, even in Cyrodiil (except for latency at times), and that's with about 20 addons running.
I don't even think they manufacture PC hardware that would be incapable of running ESO in this day and age, even from the budget range.
Heck, it's even playable with Intel graphics that go with the i5 5200, even though on lower settings, 30 fps is reachable and thus, more than playable.
I played on Xbox One, went to PC went back to Xbox One. While the graphics are nicer on PC it all depends on the PC you have. While I never used mods or ad-ons, you might have a lot of slowdowns you might not be aware of from Xbox One. Just wanted to bring that out.
So it really means is it worth for you to have those ad-ons? It will take you a while to get you where you are now. Good thing is, you won't loose your Xbox One character and it will always be there for you when you want to come back.
So question is, how much are you willing to pay to get these ad-ons? Also how much time are you willing to redo everything as well?
For the game to have worse performance and slowdowns than XB1, you really would need to have a 10+ year old tater.
My wife plays on a bogstandard Acer laptop with i5 5200 and GT 840, 8GB RAM and performance is buttery smooth on med-high settings, even in Cyrodiil (except for latency at times), and that's with about 20 addons running.
I don't even think they manufacture PC hardware that would be incapable of running ESO in this day and age, even from the budget range.
Heck, it's even playable with Intel graphics that go with the i5 5200, even though on lower settings, 30 fps is reachable and thus, more than playable.
That wasn't my experience. I started out playing the game on a four year old $699 laptop with 8 gigs of ram, a 2.5 Ghz AMD processor, and a Radeon HD 8650G graphics card. I could get 30-60 FPS on medium with all graphical extras (shadows, anti-aliasing, grass, etc) completely disabled before One Tamriel, but the game became more or less unplayable for me after that point. I had to turn sub-sampling down to medium to get stable FPS, and it was hideous. For CDN $379, I upgraded to a PS4, which offered me a SIGNIFICANTLY better ESO experience, performance- and graphics-wise.
Unless you have the ability to build your own PC (or know someone who can do it for you), the idea that there is a budget PC out there that can run ESO just as well as the latest consoles (and for around the same price) is a myth.
Add-ons are just handicaps for plebs. It's like using a GameShark to beat goldeneye. Stick with console.
[SNIp]
Addons do not allow you to do anything that you cannot do yourself. Yet you compare something like a minimap or a more convenient inventory, mail/guild/trade management tools to a blatant cheat/hack? Just shows how greatly educated some console folks really are.
[Edited for bait]
One word, miat...
How would YOU be able to detect an incoming channel or heavy attack occurring from stealth a second or two before it happens? Do you run around every second chugging detect invis pots or have your magelight up every second/minute/hour? Why even use magelight now that you have addons that give you advanced combat notices? or how about detecting a group of people who are currently stealthing in an area, positioning to take a keep? Think you can do this just as easy without an addon? Lol.
I played on Xbox One, went to PC went back to Xbox One. While the graphics are nicer on PC it all depends on the PC you have. While I never used mods or ad-ons, you might have a lot of slowdowns you might not be aware of from Xbox One. Just wanted to bring that out.
So it really means is it worth for you to have those ad-ons? It will take you a while to get you where you are now. Good thing is, you won't loose your Xbox One character and it will always be there for you when you want to come back.
So question is, how much are you willing to pay to get these ad-ons? Also how much time are you willing to redo everything as well?
For the game to have worse performance and slowdowns than XB1, you really would need to have a 10+ year old tater.
My wife plays on a bogstandard Acer laptop with i5 5200 and GT 840, 8GB RAM and performance is buttery smooth on med-high settings, even in Cyrodiil (except for latency at times), and that's with about 20 addons running.
I don't even think they manufacture PC hardware that would be incapable of running ESO in this day and age, even from the budget range.
Heck, it's even playable with Intel graphics that go with the i5 5200, even though on lower settings, 30 fps is reachable and thus, more than playable.
That wasn't my experience. I started out playing the game on a four year old $699 laptop with 8 gigs of ram, a 2.5 Ghz AMD processor, and a Radeon HD 8650G graphics card. I could get 30-60 FPS on medium with all graphical extras (shadows, anti-aliasing, grass, etc) completely disabled before One Tamriel, but the game became more or less unplayable for me after that point. I had to turn sub-sampling down to medium to get stable FPS, and it was hideous. For CDN $379, I upgraded to a PS4, which offered me a SIGNIFICANTLY better ESO experience, performance- and graphics-wise.
Unless you have the ability to build your own PC (or know someone who can do it for you), the idea that there is a budget PC out there that can run ESO just as well as the latest consoles (and for around the same price) is a myth.
Honestly, building a PC is not very difficult at all. Since the internet you can look up what you need, buy it, have it delivered to your door and have it all put together in a couple hours. There are less than 10 components in most PC's.
I agree that PC's are more expensive than consoles, but the reason for that is obvious.
How and who debunked it? Did zos make an official statement yet? Other than they are still reviewing it?
How and who debunked it? Did zos make an official statement yet? Other than they are still reviewing it?
No Proof was shown of its impact on other players. When such proof is asked for, all that is given is personal attacks. That's called a nontroversy. A polarizing issue with minimal, minuscule, or nonexistent effects, but still used to further a personal agenda.
The addon still works in full functionality on the PTS. You and I both know it doesn't take a month to review an addon. They DID turn on internal gauges and tests to evaluate what impact the addon could actually have, letting them see what the addon could see outside player perception. After a month of doing that, they've decided to do nothing and buried the issue.
But if you'd like, provide evidence of someone else's usage of the addon causing you a detrimental experience. And provide evidence that the devs are taking over a month to evaluate an addon.
As it stands now, the default UI of similar PVP based games does more than the addon.
I am currently an Xbox player but I am wanting to switch to PC, mostly due to the add-ons provided. I am currently around 330 CP on the xbox, so I am hesitant to lose that progress. The newest patch notes state that CP is easier to level and I'm curious how much faster it actually is.
Would switching to PC be wise?
THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »Do you know another "nontroversy"?
The nontroversey currently going on over in console land because we don't have this nonsense.
THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »Do you know another "nontroversy"?
The nontroversey currently going on over in console land because we don't have this nonsense.
Yeah I really want to run around mashing 5 buttons at 30fps @ 720p
When MMO Mice (with more buttons than your controllers on the thumb and fore-finger alone) and Keyboard works properly, and they can get over 60fps at least at 1080p if not 1440 or 2160, you might somewhat have a point.
I'm sorry but this game looks like crap at medium settings. I run at least 3 levels above ultra, a setting you don't even have access to.
THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »Do you know another "nontroversy"?
The nontroversey currently going on over in console land because we don't have this nonsense.
Yeah I really want to run around mashing 5 buttons at 30fps @ 720p
When MMO Mice (with more buttons than your controllers on the thumb and fore-finger alone) and Keyboard works properly, and they can get over 60fps at least at 1080p if not 1440 or 2160, you might somewhat have a point.
I'm sorry but this game looks like crap at medium settings. I run at least 3 levels above ultra, a setting you don't even have access to.
Unsent.Soul wrote: »THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »Do you know another "nontroversy"?
The nontroversey currently going on over in console land because we don't have this nonsense.
Yeah I really want to run around mashing 5 buttons at 30fps @ 720p
When MMO Mice (with more buttons than your controllers on the thumb and fore-finger alone) and Keyboard works properly, and they can get over 60fps at least at 1080p if not 1440 or 2160, you might somewhat have a point.
I'm sorry but this game looks like crap at medium settings. I run at least 3 levels above ultra, a setting you don't even have access to.
3 levels above ultra? Omg tell me more, I'm dying to hear about the 3 levels above ultra. Can you taste the air and smell the feces?
THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »Do you know another "nontroversy"?
The nontroversey currently going on over in console land because we don't have this nonsense.
I'm sorry but this game looks like crap at medium settings. I run at least 3 levels above ultra, a setting you don't even have access to.
THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »Do you know another "nontroversy"?
The nontroversey currently going on over in console land because we don't have this nonsense.
I'm sorry but this game looks like crap at medium settings. I run at least 3 levels above ultra, a setting you don't even have access to.
Are you suggesting that console settings are "medium"? Buddy, I played ESO on my laptop at medium for several months. I know the difference. We may not get water reflections or be able to run the game above 30 FPS, but the game on console looks NOTHING like the steaming pile of guar *** that is ESO on medium PC settings.
THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »Do you know another "nontroversy"?
The nontroversey currently going on over in console land because we don't have this nonsense.
I'm sorry but this game looks like crap at medium settings. I run at least 3 levels above ultra, a setting you don't even have access to.
Are you suggesting that console settings are "medium"? Buddy, I played ESO on my laptop at medium for several months. I know the difference. We may not get water reflections or be able to run the game above 30 FPS, but the game on console looks NOTHING like the steaming pile of guar *** that is ESO on medium PC settings.
30FPS is garbage, you're not getting around that. Hell my laptop runs 4 times that with a screen that supports it (120hz).