Maintenance for the week of December 16:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – December 16
• NA megaservers for patch maintenance – December 17, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for patch maintenance – December 17, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 17:00 UTC (12:00PM EST)
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – December 16
• NA megaservers for patch maintenance – December 17, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for patch maintenance – December 17, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 17:00 UTC (12:00PM EST)
the way ZOS buffs , nerfs makes changes is so clumsy
MakoFore
✭✭✭✭✭
✭
✭
I mean you have the benefit of a PTS to make adjustments- to test things out in a live environment- USE IT- USE US!
instead what we have is drastic reactions and overreactions every 3 months- its a turn right, turn left type of tuning - rather than incremental and experimental adjustemnts- which is what is most effective. I'm just really disappointed that the changes they've made- but moreso the way they approach changes- with large scale double digit percentage nerfs and buffs- why not tune things slowly and incrementally and see how the market reacts!?! we have maintenance every freaking week- can we not do that on the pts? can we not assign a few hundred players to give feedback on a regular basis? ill happily put time into this?!
but these changes and this approach are just clumsy .. just as we were way off the mark- with he last patch- this patch will again land way off centre- why? because its a moving , dynamic target that changes quickly- as people work out workarounds and exploits and so on. noone thought the destro multi would be that OP, etc. but the reaction has been so slow. and again - with this we can expect unforeseen and some foreseeable missteps.
i emplore you guys at Zos to take a more live and reactive approach to updates and fixes.
instead what we have is drastic reactions and overreactions every 3 months- its a turn right, turn left type of tuning - rather than incremental and experimental adjustemnts- which is what is most effective. I'm just really disappointed that the changes they've made- but moreso the way they approach changes- with large scale double digit percentage nerfs and buffs- why not tune things slowly and incrementally and see how the market reacts!?! we have maintenance every freaking week- can we not do that on the pts? can we not assign a few hundred players to give feedback on a regular basis? ill happily put time into this?!
but these changes and this approach are just clumsy .. just as we were way off the mark- with he last patch- this patch will again land way off centre- why? because its a moving , dynamic target that changes quickly- as people work out workarounds and exploits and so on. noone thought the destro multi would be that OP, etc. but the reaction has been so slow. and again - with this we can expect unforeseen and some foreseeable missteps.
i emplore you guys at Zos to take a more live and reactive approach to updates and fixes.
3
-
SolarCat02✭✭✭✭✭I kept reading that Dragonknights were getting a buff.
I don't think that word means what you think it means.
Doesn't impact my build any, but I am confused exactly what some of the changes are meant to accomplish.
Although the dragon blood change for a magicka character is going to be interesting! But a lot of tanks are going to miss that increased healing received morph.
And I guess ice staff tanking will now be a thing?Why be normal when you can be better?
Elissandra Ravenwing, Magicka Dragonknight Healer
Lady Kalila, Stamina Templar DPS
Stands-in-Danger, Nightblade Saptank
Zalarah, Stamina Dragonknight DPS0