Unlimited Bank Space for ESO+ Members

Erasure

No

Nah. "Unlimited", even if it was an arbitrarily high limited number like the crafting bag, would still debilitate accounts downgrading from ESO+ status. Imagine having to delete/decon thousands of gear items before you can move things from toon A to toon B after you stop subbing. Do you think people would be held hostage by the idea and sub forever just in case? No, they'd just quit.

Now if banks could be made, say, twice as large.... that I'd be on board with. Clear benefit that players could reasonably step down from if they needed to.

Oompuh

No

The only thing we have as ESO+ members in the bank is gear.. how much gear do you need?

Wolfshead

Yes

Paulington wrote: »

Unlimited is too much, although given that houses have double the "stuff" limit if you are an ESO+ member having double the bank space would be an amazing incentive to subscribe to ESO+.

Maybe not unlimited but have max out bank space without pay for but then again for them off us how already pay for more bank space do we get our money back?

I know i vote Yes that is for i think it can be good way to get more people subscribe to game but again not unlimited but max out bank space instead would be better

Milvan

No

Dude, I'm a ESO+ member but this one horrible idea because makes the gap between non-subscriber and subscriber way too large. I'm okay with the craft bag.

Unsent.Soul

Yes

geonsocal wrote: »

hecks yes, and, really who gives a poop about anyone else - sure as feck works for me...

I love this answer!

Riejael

I actually don't believe this feature would be good enough. As someone else said, the only thing we have in the bank is gear. You could damn near put one of every set in there, including ones you don't need.

I won't say no to it. But we definitely need more incentive than a crafting bag.

Acrolas

No

Riejael wrote: »

I won't say no to it. But we definitely need more incentive than a crafting bag.

And you would, if subscribers would hold ZOS accountable for falling from their quarterly DLC schedule, which would give you open access to four expansions a year. Instead, you got Thieves Guild, Dark Brotherhood, and the Hist dungeons for 2016.

And they liquidated IC and Orsinium on their anniversaries. Hardly worth a 365 day commitment if you could just buy it for $6-8 on sale with some patience. If they hadn't added the crafting bag, there would be absolutely no incentive for anyone to subscribe.

They don't know how to monetize. Bethesda is hiring people who only know how to use psychological tricks. No amount of incentives could possibly make me consider re-subscribing until I feel confident that they at least value integrity and profit equally. For now, I just don't trust them enough. A sack of a billion carrots won't change that. Only they can.

OrphanHelgen

Yes

Maybe not unlimited, but atleast 1000+

DaveMoeDee

No

Of course not. It is one thing to allow stacking the limited number of mats to the maximum integer size. It is another thing to allow people to store all that gear that doesn't stack. Personal banks would end up responding like guild banks at launch.

Riejael

Acrolas wrote: »

Riejael wrote: »

I won't say no to it. But we definitely need more incentive than a crafting bag.

And you would, if subscribers would hold ZOS accountable for falling from their quarterly DLC schedule, which would give you open access to four expansions a year. Instead, you got Thieves Guild, Dark Brotherhood, and the Hist dungeons for 2016.

And they liquidated IC and Orsinium on their anniversaries. Hardly worth a 365 day commitment if you could just buy it for $6-8 on sale with some patience. If they hadn't added the crafting bag, there would be absolutely no incentive for anyone to subscribe.

They don't know how to monetize. Bethesda is hiring people who only know how to use psychological tricks. No amount of incentives could possibly make me consider re-subscribing until I feel confident that they at least value integrity and profit equally. For now, I just don't trust them enough. A sack of a billion carrots won't change that. Only they can.

I used to play EQ, EQ2, WoW, and FFXIV. I wouldn't mind paying for expansions and a sub fee. But there's a lack of perks to justify it.

DLC's aren't even good enough, they'd have to add them once every 2-3 months. The DLCs in ESO are very much like the Adventure Packs that EQ2 tried. An overland zone, and a dungeon or two. No.. need more.

One thing I wouldn't mind is members having their own cluster on the megaserver. That way we have reduced input lag and the like. Of course we could still group with non-members (doing so would place us in the general clusters). If they want to be 'diplomatic' about the feature they could say its to ensure we don't see login queues.

Waseem

the craft bag is infinite storage

deleted008293

No

If sub players will get unlimited bank space as a bonus then the other mass will go into a huge rage for certain.
Unlimited bank also will cause an economy issue among other problems.
Unlimited bank means you are getting lazy.
I do agree that we need more storage but not unlimited for sure. With more and more crafting items out there and equipment we should get some more bank space at least.

nexxus_ESO

Yes

Not entirely unlimited, but a double of whatever you've purchased. So if you've bought a 10 slot upgrade, you actually get 20 slots, if you've bought 30 slots worth of upgrades, you get 60 slots. This way, plus members get a benefit, but it doesn't negate the gold sink.

They also need to make more items stacks.

itehache

Yes

Not "unlimited", but definately a boost or the possibility to keep upgrading it until another (higher) limit.

User_Name

No

Voted no, but I do think ESO+ subscribers deserve a chest with like 200 space in their upcoming houses.

I say this as a Gold Edition customer, who doesn't subscribe to ESO+ because there is little to no value for me to do so. Crafting bag + a chest in house would make me seriously consider subbing.

pattyLtd

No

The horror of never ending scrolling list over looking things and have the start scrolling from the top again

NewBlacksmurf

No

No because this means once you subscribe you can never unsub or you would loose access to tons of items.

It would have to be some other feature

lehran

No

They should expand inventory options to add inventory to houses. Ideally it'd be separated inventory, not accessible in banks or in crafting windows (except possibly crafting windows for stations in that same house). Armor stands would be an amazing first step. We do not need unlimited global inventory, but having more ways to expand inventory for an in-game fee would be good. Inventory expansions are one of the few gold sinks this game has. While it probably won't make the economy enter a period of hyper-inflation if it were removed, it still isn't a great idea.

ArcVelarian

No

I'd never be able to find anything if my bank space was unlimited! I'm a chronic hoarder.

Tone it down to an extra 15 bank slots and that'd be less... Mind numbing.

NewBlacksmurf

No

lehran wrote: »

They should expand inventory options to add inventory to houses. Ideally it'd be separated inventory, not accessible in banks or in crafting windows (except possibly crafting windows for stations in that same house). Armor stands would be an amazing first step. We do not need unlimited global inventory, but having more ways to expand inventory for an in-game fee would be good. Inventory expansions are one of the few gold sinks this game has. While it probably won't make the economy enter a period of hyper-inflation if it were removed, it still isn't a great idea.

I drastically disagree with everything you've wrote especially the highlighted sentences.

Ideally global inventory expansion is what is needed. People seem to also want housing features but that's not to limit global inventory spaces.

Bouldercleave

Yes

Unlimited? - No

I think EVERYONE needs an increase though. Say 100 increase for non sub and 160 for subscribers.

The game has been out WAY too long for the amount of space we have currently.

Cillion3117

Yes

After crafting bags, I don't really need much bank space anymore.

Ourorboros

No

As a subscriber, I want to vote YES. That would make life easier. But it would also create more problems, like a lot of hate from non-subscribers. This poll just highlights what a crap inventory system this game has. Thankfully, there are many great addons, as the default system is horrible, even worse on consoles. Unlimited banking for subscribers would only be a lazy way for zos to further line their pockets, but at the expensive of creating a more thorough and flexible inventory system.

MasterSpatula

No

Seriously?

Arthg

No

The crafting bags strike the perfect balance between subscribers and non-subscribers, IMHO.

jedtb16_ESO

No

no..... just no.

Loralai_907

No

No. We already have crafting bags. I would like to see sub rewards continue to evolve, but I don't think unlimited bag space moves in the right direction.

VDoom1

No

No. For one it would be extremely unfair for normal players. And unlimited...sounds like it will end with a terrible bug of all items vanishing, if someone just stuffs their bank full endlessly. I can agree that it would give normal players another reason to become Plus players. But I doubt more bank space alone would be that tempting. After all we can already expand bank space, it just costs some gold.

Jimbullbee85

Yes

Ooooh pretty close this one!

Taleof2Cities

No

I'd be down for additional bank or bag space for ESO+ members, sure. ESO+ does need more perks.

Unlimited bank space, in my opinion, is too OP ...