jphipps85b14_ESO1 wrote: »The daggers also add 5% weap/spell dmg.
Unsent.Soul wrote: »jphipps85b14_ESO1 wrote: »So then having swords and daggers equipped has ZERO differences in that case. I guess I thought people were talking about 2-handed weapons compared to 1-handed. There is literally no difference between 2 swords or 2 daggers, except that the daggers look cooler. But if you're trying to argue that a 2-hander like a Mace would be more of a benefit than DW daggers, you are very much wrong on that.
There is a difference, that's what people have been trying to tell you, it's pretty much spelled out for you.
jphipps85b14_ESO1 wrote: »Unsent.Soul wrote: »jphipps85b14_ESO1 wrote: »So then having swords and daggers equipped has ZERO differences in that case. I guess I thought people were talking about 2-handed weapons compared to 1-handed. There is literally no difference between 2 swords or 2 daggers, except that the daggers look cooler. But if you're trying to argue that a 2-hander like a Mace would be more of a benefit than DW daggers, you are very much wrong on that.
There is a difference, that's what people have been trying to tell you, it's pretty much spelled out for you.
But... there is no difference when comparing DW swords or DW daggers.
jphipps85b14_ESO1 wrote: »The daggers also add 5% weap/spell dmg.
No. Daggers add weapon crit, only swords add spell damage.
jphipps85b14_ESO1 wrote: »So then having swords and daggers equipped has ZERO differences in that case. I guess I thought people were talking about 2-handed weapons compared to 1-handed. There is literally no difference between 2 swords or 2 daggers, except that the daggers look cooler. But if you're trying to argue that a 2-hander like a Mace would be more of a benefit than DW daggers, you are very much wrong on that.