Sunderflame 5 piece bonus

hon.king.kirbyneb18_ESO

[url="[url=http://www.fotos-hochladen.net][img]http://img5.fotos-hochladen.net/uploads/screenshot2016n7lv8weo3m.png[/img][/url]"][/url]

Sunderflame 5th piece bonus does fire dmg but reduce physical
Fire dmg does more dmg if the magical resi is lower
So why not make taht fire dmg to poisen or physical dmg

Xrucible

hon.king.kirbyneb18_ESO wrote: »

[url="[url=http://www.fotos-hochladen.net][img]http://img5.fotos-hochladen.net/uploads/screenshot2016n7lv8weo3m.png[/img][/url]"][/url]

Sunderflame 5th piece bonus does fire dmg but reduce physical
Fire dmg does more dmg if the magical resi is lower
So why not make taht fire dmg to poisen or physical dmg

Balance?? Also why would a set named flame do anything other than flame damage?

SanTii.92

Yea, it's strong enough as it is.

RoyJade

The main utility is the armor debuff. The flame additional damage is a bonus. Plus, with the set localization and the name, a poison damage would be weird.

stevepdodson_ESO888

hon.king.kirbyneb18_ESO wrote: »

[url="[url=http://www.fotos-hochladen.net][img]http://img5.fotos-hochladen.net/uploads/screenshot2016n7lv8weo3m.png[/img][/url]"][/url]

Sunderflame 5th piece bonus does fire dmg but reduce physical
Fire dmg does more dmg if the magical resi is lower
So why not make taht fire dmg to poisen or physical dmg

the reason is old set not re-worked to reflect changes