You can take my door but you can't take my farm!

IxSTALKERxI

Siege hype! Can also fit 20 balista's a long the top of a single keep wall lol. The possibilities are endless.

Vizeroh

Rohamad_Ali

Nothing more dangerous then a determined farmer .

LegendaryChef

I don't even want to know how long it took to set that up

ku5h

Rohamad_Ali wrote: »

Nothing more dangerous then a determined farmer .

they are the worst, will do anything just so they dont have to fight on even ground...

KisoValley

Decent.

caeliusstarbreaker

ku5h wrote: »

Rohamad_Ali wrote: »

Nothing more dangerous then a determined farmer .

they are the worst, will do anything just so they dont have to fight on even ground...

Hahahaha

Asgari

ku5h wrote: »

Rohamad_Ali wrote: »

Nothing more dangerous then a determined farmer .

they are the worst, will do anything just so they dont have to fight on even ground...

Sounds like you have had a lot of tough nights being farmed.

zuto40

you are my hero

Ghost-Shot

Princess_Asgari wrote: »

ku5h wrote: »

Rohamad_Ali wrote: »

Nothing more dangerous then a determined farmer .

they are the worst, will do anything just so they dont have to fight on even ground...

Sounds like you have had a lot of tough nights being farmed.

Rekt [ ] Not Rekt [ ] TyrannosaurusRekt [x]

Joy_Division

LOL.

Did they change siege placement restrictions?

CyrusArya

ku5h wrote: »

they are the worst, will do anything just so they dont have to fight on even ground...

If it was an even fight, there wouldn't be a need for towers and siege for any decent squad.

IxSTALKERxI

Joy_Division wrote: »

LOL.

Did they change siege placement restrictions?

They changed ballista's so they take up less room, to give you the ability to set up a ballista between each opening along a keep wall and aim directly down as raids have always hugged the wall to avoid being sieged.

You can fit like 8 or so balista's on the front flag of a keep now pointing at back etc. Or hold the top floor with a lot. Gotta be careful not to go over siege limit though haha.

Meilinka

Oh my.

OtarTheMad

lol, that's great.

Publius_Scipio

So you really think so?

*Satuday Morning 7 am*

*Loud knock on Stalker's door*

.............

*Second longer loud knock*

*Stalker's wife (a khajiit) turns around in bed*

Stalker's wife: hhhhrrrrrmmmm, this one heard something. Honey wake up.

*Stalker's eyes open and blink a few times*

Stalker: Yeah I heard it.

*Third knock on the door. Notably more forceful than the previous two*

Stalker: *in a loud tone yelling across the house* OK! OK! Hold your horses!

*Stalker throws the comforter and bedsheets off of him, gets up, puts his feet into his favorite slippers (the khajiit ones his wife got him for his birthday a few birthdays ago), grabs his robe lying on a chair near the bed, begins walking out of the bedroom to go to the front door while tying the robe snuggly across his waist*

*Stalker unlocks and opens his front door*
*Two Dominion soldiers (Pixy Stix and Teapot) are standing on his porch*

Stalker: Can I help you two?
Teapot: Mr. Stalker?
Stalker: Yeah, that's me.

*Pixy Stix extends his arm out to Stalker*
*In Pixy Stix's hand is a scroll with the official seal of the Dominion on it*
*Stalker looks down at the scroll and then looks back up at the two soldiers*

Stalker: What the hell is this?
Pixy Stix: These papers are to inform you that YOUR FARM is now property of the Dominion. You and your family have one week to vacate.
Stalker: What!!!? Is this a joke!? Under whose authority!?
Teapot: Under the authority of High Commander Crown.

*Stalker angrily rips the scroll out of Pixy Stix's hand, breaks the seal, rolls it open and scans it for a few seconds*

Stalker: High Commander Crown!!! You two mother f[snip] come to my house at 7 am! Wake up my wife! And tell me that I no longer own my farm!!!???
Stalker: This farm has been in my family for generations!!! Great Great Great Granpappy Stalker settled here and started this farm! The corn fields here are the same fields he tilled!
Stalker: How will i provide for my family!!??

Teapot: That is of no concern to us. We follow orders.
Pixy Stix: You have one week to vacate the premises. If you fail to do so you will be found to be in contempt of these orders and the authority herein. You will be promptly arrested.

*Teapot and Pixy Stix turn around walk off Stalker's porch, and continue walking down the long driveway to the street where their horses are tied*

*Stalker angrily looks side to side*
*Stalker looks back down at the scroll clenched tightly in his fist*
*Stalker angrily with both hands crumples the paper into a ball and hurls it at the floor of the porch*

Stalker: AAAARRRGGGHHH!!! You two mother f[snip]!!!!!!!! How dare you!!!!!?? I am Stalker!!!! Mother f[snip]erssssss!!!!!!!!

Old McStalker had a farm!
E-I-E-I-O!
And on that farm he had a khajiit!!!
E-I-E-I-O!

With a meow meow here
And a meow meow there
Here a meow, there a meow
Everywhere a meow meow

Old McStalker had a farm!
E-I-E-I-OOOOOoooooOOOOOooooooOOO!!!!!

I just took your farm away.

Ghettokid

Not your farm, I dont see your name on it.

leepalmer95

lol...

Replace 2 of them for oils though

DisgracefulMind

Excellent.

Those of us who know how to set up a nice upstairs fight are going to be even better off.

Hektik_V

The yellows would love this change with their love for siege!

God_flakes

In theory you shouldn't be able to set siege inside a tower of a resource you don't own.

leepalmer95

God_flakes wrote: »

In theory you shouldn't be able to set siege inside a tower of a resource you don't own.

Why not, people can set siege up in keeps they don't own.

God_flakes

leepalmer95 wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

In theory you shouldn't be able to set siege inside a tower of a resource you don't own.

Why not, people can set siege up in keeps they don't own.

Unless you've broken down the outer you can't get into a keep to set siege. Only if you've exploited into a keep. Right? I think perhaps if zos had just made it impossible to set siege inside the tower of a enemy resource, they wouldn't need to get rid of the doors. I mean you can't go inside the tower of an enemy resource, so why should you be able to set siege in there?

NACtron

I'm just thinking about how many cold fire ballistas we can set up as counter siege when defending keep. I approve of this change.

Luigi_Vampa

God_flakes wrote: »

leepalmer95 wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

In theory you shouldn't be able to set siege inside a tower of a resource you don't own.

Why not, people can set siege up in keeps they don't own.

Unless you've broken down the outer you can't get into a keep to set siege. Only if you've exploited into a keep. Right? I think perhaps if zos had just made it impossible to set siege inside the tower of a enemy resource, they wouldn't need to get rid of the doors. I mean you can't go inside the tower of an enemy resource, so why should you be able to set siege in there?

If you are stealthed in an enemy keep when it is repaired you can set up siege after walls are up and it is no longer flagged. There are legitimate ways of being in a keep without having just smashed down the walls. This is the same idea.

God_flakes

Typhoios wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

leepalmer95 wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

In theory you shouldn't be able to set siege inside a tower of a resource you don't own.

Why not, people can set siege up in keeps they don't own.

Unless you've broken down the outer you can't get into a keep to set siege. Only if you've exploited into a keep. Right? I think perhaps if zos had just made it impossible to set siege inside the tower of a enemy resource, they wouldn't need to get rid of the doors. I mean you can't go inside the tower of an enemy resource, so why should you be able to set siege in there?

If you are stealthed in an enemy keep when it is repaired you can set up siege after walls are up and it is no longer flagged. There are legitimate ways of being in a keep without having just smashed down the walls. This is the same idea.

Yeah, it's been done to prep a keep. But never to defend it. You have no need to defend a keep you don't own. You should have no reason to defend a tower of an enemy owned resource you don't own, either. I'm just thinking maybe they can leave the dang doors and simply prevent people from setting siege period. Problem solved.

leepalmer95

God_flakes wrote: »

Typhoios wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

leepalmer95 wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

In theory you shouldn't be able to set siege inside a tower of a resource you don't own.

Why not, people can set siege up in keeps they don't own.

Unless you've broken down the outer you can't get into a keep to set siege. Only if you've exploited into a keep. Right? I think perhaps if zos had just made it impossible to set siege inside the tower of a enemy resource, they wouldn't need to get rid of the doors. I mean you can't go inside the tower of an enemy resource, so why should you be able to set siege in there?

If you are stealthed in an enemy keep when it is repaired you can set up siege after walls are up and it is no longer flagged. There are legitimate ways of being in a keep without having just smashed down the walls. This is the same idea.

Yeah, it's been done to prep a keep. But never to defend it. You have no need to defend a keep you don't own. You should have no reason to defend a tower of an enemy owned resource you don't own, either. I'm just thinking maybe they can leave the dang doors and simply prevent people from setting siege period. Problem solved.

Not really they've been a few times when i've been sieging a keep with a few other people and people call out a mega zerg coming to wipe us, so well all go into a tower and set up oils and such as it's easier to defend.

God_flakes

leepalmer95 wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

Typhoios wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

leepalmer95 wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

In theory you shouldn't be able to set siege inside a tower of a resource you don't own.

Why not, people can set siege up in keeps they don't own.

Unless you've broken down the outer you can't get into a keep to set siege. Only if you've exploited into a keep. Right? I think perhaps if zos had just made it impossible to set siege inside the tower of a enemy resource, they wouldn't need to get rid of the doors. I mean you can't go inside the tower of an enemy resource, so why should you be able to set siege in there?

If you are stealthed in an enemy keep when it is repaired you can set up siege after walls are up and it is no longer flagged. There are legitimate ways of being in a keep without having just smashed down the walls. This is the same idea.

Yeah, it's been done to prep a keep. But never to defend it. You have no need to defend a keep you don't own. You should have no reason to defend a tower of an enemy owned resource you don't own, either. I'm just thinking maybe they can leave the dang doors and simply prevent people from setting siege period. Problem solved.

Not really they've been a few times when i've been sieging a keep with a few other people and people call out a mega zerg coming to wipe us, so well all go into a tower and set up oils and such as it's easier to defend.

And guess what? Those towers don't have doors.

leepalmer95

God_flakes wrote: »

leepalmer95 wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

Typhoios wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

leepalmer95 wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

In theory you shouldn't be able to set siege inside a tower of a resource you don't own.

Why not, people can set siege up in keeps they don't own.

Unless you've broken down the outer you can't get into a keep to set siege. Only if you've exploited into a keep. Right? I think perhaps if zos had just made it impossible to set siege inside the tower of a enemy resource, they wouldn't need to get rid of the doors. I mean you can't go inside the tower of an enemy resource, so why should you be able to set siege in there?

If you are stealthed in an enemy keep when it is repaired you can set up siege after walls are up and it is no longer flagged. There are legitimate ways of being in a keep without having just smashed down the walls. This is the same idea.

Yeah, it's been done to prep a keep. But never to defend it. You have no need to defend a keep you don't own. You should have no reason to defend a tower of an enemy owned resource you don't own, either. I'm just thinking maybe they can leave the dang doors and simply prevent people from setting siege period. Problem solved.

Not really they've been a few times when i've been sieging a keep with a few other people and people call out a mega zerg coming to wipe us, so well all go into a tower and set up oils and such as it's easier to defend.

And guess what? Those towers don't have doors.

Cool, but i can still set up siege in a enemy owned place and i do it for a reason.

Luigi_Vampa

God_flakes wrote: »

leepalmer95 wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

Typhoios wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

leepalmer95 wrote: »

God_flakes wrote: »

In theory you shouldn't be able to set siege inside a tower of a resource you don't own.

Why not, people can set siege up in keeps they don't own.

Unless you've broken down the outer you can't get into a keep to set siege. Only if you've exploited into a keep. Right? I think perhaps if zos had just made it impossible to set siege inside the tower of a enemy resource, they wouldn't need to get rid of the doors. I mean you can't go inside the tower of an enemy resource, so why should you be able to set siege in there?

If you are stealthed in an enemy keep when it is repaired you can set up siege after walls are up and it is no longer flagged. There are legitimate ways of being in a keep without having just smashed down the walls. This is the same idea.

Yeah, it's been done to prep a keep. But never to defend it. You have no need to defend a keep you don't own. You should have no reason to defend a tower of an enemy owned resource you don't own, either. I'm just thinking maybe they can leave the dang doors and simply prevent people from setting siege period. Problem solved.

Not really they've been a few times when i've been sieging a keep with a few other people and people call out a mega zerg coming to wipe us, so well all go into a tower and set up oils and such as it's easier to defend.

And guess what? Those towers don't have doors.

Why are you still talking about doors? We are talking about setting up siege in an enemy keep. You said you couldn't without exploiting or smashing down the walls yourself and I showed you otherwise. You then said you had no reason to use siege to defend yourself in an enemy controlled keep and @leepalmer95 showed you otherwise.

Master_Kas

@Nafirian @MLRPZ arrius mine is begging for Us to do this