+1 ..... They never stated the bundle items would be available separately. When I read the news on this I knew then there would be no separate purchases. Not sure why everyone is so surprised on this as it was clearly stated in advance. Everyone should of been complaining since they announced this and not after it actually went live.http://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/news/post/2016/08/26/celebrate-imperial-citys-one-year-anniversary
It says quite clearly that those items are part of a bundle. No where does it say you could purchase them separately.
I feel ZOS made the right decision with this bundle. If you didn't buy the items separately when they were available, now yo have the option to buy them again. Don't need everything else included in the bundle? Well too bad. You should have gotten it when it was available originally. That's the bonus for buying it when it is first released. I'm glad they did this because I don't want everyone running around with the skin and horse I purchased. Keep up the great work, ZOS!
I also feel they made the right decision. I also got my skin when it was originally released. I did not get the horse then. Still on the fence if I will purchase the bundle to get the horse. I also do not own IC as I have been subscribing since day one on the XB1, so that helps offset some of the bundle costs.neville_bart0s wrote: »I already got the skin the first time so im stoked, i dont want everyone walking around lookin like me. well played ZOS.
It will cost more than 10x the bundle at minimum of 1 in 1000 chance to get one. When they do get a previous limited edition mount, it will not be the one they want.Everyone should keep in mind, these items will most likely be coming to a 'lottery box' in the near future... so then you can spend 10x the 'IC set' cost trying to RNG your way to getting them.
+1 ..... They never stated the bundle items would be available separately. When I read the news on this I knew then there would be no separate purchases. Not sure why everyone is so surprised on this as it was clearly stated in advance. Everyone should of been complaining since they announced this and not after it actually went live.http://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/news/post/2016/08/26/celebrate-imperial-citys-one-year-anniversary
It says quite clearly that those items are part of a bundle. No where does it say you could purchase them separately.I feel ZOS made the right decision with this bundle. If you didn't buy the items separately when they were available, now yo have the option to buy them again. Don't need everything else included in the bundle? Well too bad. You should have gotten it when it was available originally. That's the bonus for buying it when it is first released. I'm glad they did this because I don't want everyone running around with the skin and horse I purchased. Keep up the great work, ZOS!I also feel they made the right decision. I also got my skin when it was originally released. I did not get the horse then. Still on the fence if I will purchase the bundle to get the horse. I also do not own IC as I have been subscribing since day one on the XB1, so that helps offset some of the bundle costs.neville_bart0s wrote: »I already got the skin the first time so im stoked, i dont want everyone walking around lookin like me. well played ZOS.It will cost more than 10x the bundle at minimum of 1 in 1000 chance to get one. When they do get a previous limited edition mount, it will not be the one they want.Everyone should keep in mind, these items will most likely be coming to a 'lottery box' in the near future... so then you can spend 10x the 'IC set' cost trying to RNG your way to getting them.
ZOS can't win or do anything right with the people on this forums. They clearly announced their intent well before it went live.
A lot of posts on releasing previous released items in the Crown Store forum. They finally so something to re-release something people have been requesting and all everyone can do is complain. They gave the community wanted. At no point did anyone request on how they should re-release the items.
It is a business and they are here to make money. They can't give you the world for your base game purchase. If they do not make money, there is not a game to play.
.
DRXHarbinger wrote: »Have they not replied on this at all yet?
So basically they try to persuade people to buy the bundle even if you already have some items included in this (as an ESO+ member or through the direct purchase) which means they admit that their intention is to draw the money out of customers as much as possible. It also means they consider it as a "bargain" or "good deal" and are not going to do anything.In addition to these in-game bonuses, exclusive items will be returning to the Crown Store for the first time in months with the Imperial City Collector's Bundle. Available even if you already own the DLC, the Collector's Bundle contains the Mind-Shriven Horse Mount, the Mind-Shriven Skin Costume, the Daedrat Pet, and 5 experience scrolls
As far as I know you can farm only the soul-shriven skin.From now until 15:00 BST September 6th, your chances have never been better to obtain the Imperial City's best loot. Earn high-cost items faster by taking advantage of increased drops of Tel Var Stones! You'll also have a much higher chance of receiving aspirational rewards, including the Mind-Shriven skin and the Stonefire Scamp pet from Molag Bal!
Lieblingsjunge wrote: »I second this. I want the mount and the skin. I'm an ESO+ member so I don't need the DLCs. Neither do I need EXP-scrolls.
And if your goal is to make as much money as possible: Give us the option to buy the mount/skin separately, I know a lot of people who wants it, me included; but we won't buy a bundle just for the skin + mount.
IzakiBrotheSs wrote: »I f*cking sold out. Had been a sub for like 8 months but didn't purchase a single DLC... Decided to get the bundle because yolo. The DLC by itself has no value to me as the day when I stop my sub is the day I'll stop playing as in my opinion its either you support the devs to the max or you don't play the game. That's just how I function though. I only wanted the damn skin and the horse to start with... Then I though well at least I'd have 10 hours of CP grinding to do! I didn't even see they had a pet in there so I guess I'll just put it on because I f*cking paid for it.
optyk2477_ESO wrote: »IzakiBrotheSs wrote: »I f*cking sold out. Had been a sub for like 8 months but didn't purchase a single DLC... Decided to get the bundle because yolo. The DLC by itself has no value to me as the day when I stop my sub is the day I'll stop playing as in my opinion its either you support the devs to the max or you don't play the game. That's just how I function though. I only wanted the damn skin and the horse to start with... Then I though well at least I'd have 10 hours of CP grinding to do! I didn't even see they had a pet in there so I guess I'll just put it on because I f*cking paid for it.
THIS is the exact mentality to have lol. Either eat it or leave it. I'll be leaving at the end of the year. I've already invested a few thousand into Star Trek Online which has been using the same exact lockbox system for 2+ years. And I'm going to take the plunge into $tar ¢itizen. No way I'm throwing even more money at ZOS' hybrid "mmorpg" -sorry.
Everyone please stop with the whole "I already have these things" argument because you're going to be saying the same poo when you open lockboxes.
Pssh. Just wait until they add "Gold", "Event" and "Limited" lockboxes later. Thats coming too.
I understand that a company needs to maintain a flow of new revenue to keep a game going. What it does not need to do is use this style of looped monetization. It's horsecrap and turns games into investment trading and puts more pressure on the devs to balance pricing, marketing and gem store additions rather than the game itself.
TL;DR: just buy the bundle (as it will be one of the last offered), because that mount is going to cost more when it's inside a lockbox later.
Lord_Dexter wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno , how long ZOS will remain silent on their mistakes and not compensate with loyal players for such errors.
We are waiting, lets see how long ZOS shows its height of ignorance...
optyk2477_ESO wrote: »IzakiBrotheSs wrote: »I f*cking sold out. Had been a sub for like 8 months but didn't purchase a single DLC... Decided to get the bundle because yolo. The DLC by itself has no value to me as the day when I stop my sub is the day I'll stop playing as in my opinion its either you support the devs to the max or you don't play the game. That's just how I function though. I only wanted the damn skin and the horse to start with... Then I though well at least I'd have 10 hours of CP grinding to do! I didn't even see they had a pet in there so I guess I'll just put it on because I f*cking paid for it.
THIS is the exact mentality to have lol. Either eat it or leave it. I'll be leaving at the end of the year. I've already invested a few thousand into Star Trek Online which has been using the same exact lockbox system for 2+ years. And I'm going to take the plunge into $tar ¢itizen. No way I'm throwing even more money at ZOS' hybrid "mmorpg" -sorry.
Everyone please stop with the whole "I already have these things" argument because you're going to be saying the same poo when you open lockboxes.
Pssh. Just wait until they add "Gold", "Event" and "Limited" lockboxes later. Thats coming too.
I understand that a company needs to maintain a flow of new revenue to keep a game going. What it does not need to do is use this style of looped monetization. It's horsecrap and turns games into investment trading and puts more pressure on the devs to balance pricing, marketing and gem store additions rather than the game itself.
TL;DR: just buy the bundle (as it will be one of the last offered), because that mount is going to cost more when it's inside a lockbox later.
DRXHarbinger wrote: »Have they not replied on this at all yet?
They probably don't care. They can see how many people are buying their crap, if they aren't changing their current model that's probably because its working.