Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Rekt
Farming insightfuls . Also , send sexytyme snapchat photos to ZOS for unbanning
Perpetuation wrote: »Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Rekt
Farming insightfuls . Also , send sexytyme snapchat photos to ZOS for unbanning
If that's what Mr. Axis power country guy really looks like then I'll take his sexytime photos any day
I think they should have to have video evidence of gap closing in keeps. Sometimes you gap close someone headed to a door and bam you're now inside the keep. It happens, and if people hate you they will report you even though it's not intended.
1. Paragraphs save posts.
2. If you put on a new set of armor and you suddenly pull 100k+ DPS and you keep playing with that setup, the consequences of your actions is 100% on you.
Doesn't matter how that armor set got bugged. You're knowingly exploiting an in-game bug.
Wreuntzylla wrote: »
Free Lemur
1. If you don't know right from wrong, learn it.
2. see 1.
Example:
drive on highway, everyone going 100mph, would you too? Probably. Then you get picked out the pack.
You: but, but, but, but officer, everyone on the road was going 100mph so I thought it was ok.
Him: You are dumb.
There is never a time where you can blame someone else for your own poor choices. NEVER.
It literally doesn't matter in any way about any one else's punishment here because buddy the shoe is on the other foot.
You don't consider other peoples feelings in your exploitative behavior, ZOS will not consider your feelings in the consequence of that behavior.
Don't like it? Pound sand.
antihero727 wrote: »1. If you don't know right from wrong, learn it.
2. see 1.
Example:
drive on highway, everyone going 100mph, would you too? Probably. Then you get picked out the pack.
You: but, but, but, but officer, everyone on the road was going 100mph so I thought it was ok.
Him: You are dumb.
There is never a time where you can blame someone else for your own poor choices. NEVER.
It literally doesn't matter in any way about any one else's punishment here because buddy the shoe is on the other foot.
You don't consider other peoples feelings in your exploitative behavior, ZOS will not consider your feelings in the consequence of that behavior.
Don't like it? Pound sand.
Not the same. What you have is a fake no tolerance policy on exploiting. There were quite a few that used this but only a few got perma banned while others got a warning letter, some got nothing. We still have 3rd party software users, what makes a set of broken stat armor worse than a hacker in a game? That is the whole point of this post is if they used CE to get those results, knew a sympathetic ear in customer support, or had a stream would the outcome be the same? Is it a ban hammer dartboard or a magic 8 ball of banning.
antihero727 wrote: »1. If you don't know right from wrong, learn it.
2. see 1.
Example:
drive on highway, everyone going 100mph, would you too? Probably. Then you get picked out the pack.
You: but, but, but, but officer, everyone on the road was going 100mph so I thought it was ok.
Him: You are dumb.
There is never a time where you can blame someone else for your own poor choices. NEVER.
It literally doesn't matter in any way about any one else's punishment here because buddy the shoe is on the other foot.
You don't consider other peoples feelings in your exploitative behavior, ZOS will not consider your feelings in the consequence of that behavior.
Don't like it? Pound sand.
Not the same. What you have is a fake no tolerance policy on exploiting. There were quite a few that used this but only a few got perma banned while others got a warning letter, some got nothing. We still have 3rd party software users, what makes a set of broken stat armor worse than a hacker in a game? That is the whole point of this post is if they used CE to get those results, knew a sympathetic ear in customer support, or had a stream would the outcome be the same? Is it a ban hammer dartboard or a magic 8 ball of banning.
This is conjecture and speculation at best, slander at worst.
You don't know any of the things you are talking about, and even if you DID you could not present it in this "court of forums" as evidence per the naming and shaming policy.
The point is the rules are the rules and you follow them because they are the rules, not because there may be indifferent punishment or consequence for other people.
Those people are not you, those people are irrelevant to your behavior. Sure you may use precedent to argue that your behavior was to be expected and plead down the punishment, but you still broke the damn rules.
How is this not a simple thing to understand? Rules are not to be broken, they are meant to be followed.
If someone else breaks the rules and gets away with it, that does not mean that its ok for you to.
1. If you don't know right from wrong, learn it.
2. see 1.
Example:
drive on highway, everyone going 100mph, would you too? Probably. Then you get picked out the pack.
You: but, but, but, but officer, everyone on the road was going 100mph so I thought it was ok.
Him: You are dumb.
There is never a time where you can blame someone else for your own poor choices. NEVER.
It literally doesn't matter in any way about any one else's punishment here because buddy the shoe is on the other foot.
You don't consider other peoples feelings in your exploitative behavior, ZOS will not consider your feelings in the consequence of that behavior.
Don't like it? Pound sand.
GottbeardESO wrote: »1. If you don't know right from wrong, learn it.
2. see 1.
Example:
drive on highway, everyone going 100mph, would you too? Probably. Then you get picked out the pack.
You: but, but, but, but officer, everyone on the road was going 100mph so I thought it was ok.
Him: You are dumb.
There is never a time where you can blame someone else for your own poor choices. NEVER.
It literally doesn't matter in any way about any one else's punishment here because buddy the shoe is on the other foot.
You don't consider other peoples feelings in your exploitative behavior, ZOS will not consider your feelings in the consequence of that behavior.
Don't like it? Pound sand.
If you are going to tell a hypothetical story to represent this situation, then at least make it accurate.
The city screws up and prints 100 MPH speed limit road signs. Then instead of publicly announcing the snafu and immediately working to undo the mistake, they print a pamphlet and leave it at the DMV stating the drivers should of known better than to drive 100 MPH. They then use traffic cams to identify drivers andmail out notices to every driver who followed the erroneous speed limit informing them that their licenses have been permanently revoked. Furthermore, they refuse to say why or to communicate any further. Meanwhile, murderers are killing people on the side of the road in broad daylight and not being taken to jail.
There you go. That is a more accurate hypothetical.
GottbeardESO wrote: »1. If you don't know right from wrong, learn it.
2. see 1.
Example:
drive on highway, everyone going 100mph, would you too? Probably. Then you get picked out the pack.
You: but, but, but, but officer, everyone on the road was going 100mph so I thought it was ok.
Him: You are dumb.
There is never a time where you can blame someone else for your own poor choices. NEVER.
It literally doesn't matter in any way about any one else's punishment here because buddy the shoe is on the other foot.
You don't consider other peoples feelings in your exploitative behavior, ZOS will not consider your feelings in the consequence of that behavior.
Don't like it? Pound sand.
If you are going to tell a hypothetical story to represent this situation, then at least make it accurate.
The city screws up and prints 100 MPH speed limit road signs. Then instead of publicly announcing the snafu and immediately working to undo the mistake, they print a pamphlet and leave it at the DMV stating the drivers should of known better than to drive 100 MPH. They then use traffic cams to identify drivers andmail out notices to every driver who followed the erroneous speed limit informing them that their licenses have been permanently revoked. Furthermore, they refuse to say why or to communicate any further. Meanwhile, murderers are killing people on the side of the road in broad daylight and not being taken to jail.
There you go. That is a more accurate hypothetical.
Please tell me this never happened in reality. If so then Giant Meteor 2016.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »GottbeardESO wrote: »1. If you don't know right from wrong, learn it.
2. see 1.
Example:
drive on highway, everyone going 100mph, would you too? Probably. Then you get picked out the pack.
You: but, but, but, but officer, everyone on the road was going 100mph so I thought it was ok.
Him: You are dumb.
There is never a time where you can blame someone else for your own poor choices. NEVER.
It literally doesn't matter in any way about any one else's punishment here because buddy the shoe is on the other foot.
You don't consider other peoples feelings in your exploitative behavior, ZOS will not consider your feelings in the consequence of that behavior.
Don't like it? Pound sand.
If you are going to tell a hypothetical story to represent this situation, then at least make it accurate.
The city screws up and prints 100 MPH speed limit road signs. Then instead of publicly announcing the snafu and immediately working to undo the mistake, they print a pamphlet and leave it at the DMV stating the drivers should of known better than to drive 100 MPH. They then use traffic cams to identify drivers andmail out notices to every driver who followed the erroneous speed limit informing them that their licenses have been permanently revoked. Furthermore, they refuse to say why or to communicate any further. Meanwhile, murderers are killing people on the side of the road in broad daylight and not being taken to jail.
There you go. That is a more accurate hypothetical.
Please tell me this never happened in reality. If so then Giant Meteor 2016.
It never happens in reality because every other company that exists in the real world, and even the government, has higher quality and consistency standards than ZOS.
You would never put up with cell phone service this terrible. Would you go to a movie where half of the movie was freezing on the screen and 10FPS. Or where the theater allows people to bring in alcohol and smoke right in your face but then kicks you out for coughing during the film because the manager knows the kids who smoke?