No, this is not necessary. It's a disease, such things are not supposed to be pretty. If someone wants to have vampirism, they should wear their skin with pride. As I had one of my characters be a vampire, I simply used a dwarven hat, which makes a great mask (for example) to hide the face. Difficult of course, if you have an animal race, especially argonian...
No, this is not necessary. It's a disease, such things are not supposed to be pretty. If someone wants to have vampirism, they should wear their skin with pride. As I had one of my characters be a vampire, I simply used a dwarven hat, which makes a great mask (for example) to hide the face. Difficult of course, if you have an animal race, especially argonian...
arcadiadark wrote: »Yet verandiss stormravenn can hide it without any penalty??
Edit: I meant ravenwatchh
Honestly I'm okay with the eye appearance, I like how that looks in stages 1-2. I just really, really want to disable the purple skin.
I'd get a costume like this if it was available, but I feel like it'd be better if it came with a few more customisation options. Like having the ability to set an appearance stage regardless of your current stage (e.g. a stage 4 vampire electing to appear like they're at stage 2) and the ability to toggle off skin or eye effects or both.No, this is not necessary. It's a disease, such things are not supposed to be pretty. If someone wants to have vampirism, they should wear their skin with pride. As I had one of my characters be a vampire, I simply used a dwarven hat, which makes a great mask (for example) to hide the face. Difficult of course, if you have an animal race, especially argonian...
Hiding a vampire's face under a helmet isn't exactly wearing their skin with pride .
Honestly I'm okay with the eye appearance, I like how that looks in stages 1-2. I just really, really want to disable the purple skin.
I'd get a costume like this if it was available, but I feel like it'd be better if it came with a few more customisation options. Like having the ability to set an appearance stage regardless of your current stage (e.g. a stage 4 vampire electing to appear like they're at stage 2) and the ability to toggle off skin or eye effects or both.No, this is not necessary. It's a disease, such things are not supposed to be pretty. If someone wants to have vampirism, they should wear their skin with pride. As I had one of my characters be a vampire, I simply used a dwarven hat, which makes a great mask (for example) to hide the face. Difficult of course, if you have an animal race, especially argonian...
Hiding a vampire's face under a helmet isn't exactly wearing their skin with pride .
You are mixing things up. Sentences have periods for a purpose...
These type of threads is what leads ZOS to put everything in the crown store instead of basic gameplay options.
These type of threads is what leads ZOS to put everything in the crown store instead of basic gameplay options.
The only reason why I mind it is because it makes my burn scar, on my face, almost invisible.
No, this is not necessary. It's a disease, such things are not supposed to be pretty. If someone wants to have vampirism, they should wear their skin with pride. As I had one of my characters be a vampire, I simply used a dwarven hat, which makes a great mask (for example) to hide the face. Difficult of course, if you have an animal race, especially argonian...
MornaBaine wrote: »
It would be lore breaking yes.
Lots of people would complain, yes.
But as an argonian/khajiit player, I never took vampirism mostly due to the ugly white skin and red eyes. I would buy that from the crown store if it was to hide it, even if, by my standards, it breaks the lore/immersion of being a vampire.I like those 2 races skin patterns and it would be a waste to just to ruin it by being vampire.
Yes so people who don't want to look ugly but still want the vampirism.
No for lore breaking immersion.
What am I mixing up? You said vampires should wear their skin with pride, then said you had a vampiric character and covered their face up with a Dwarven helm. Now I'm lost, I can't figure out what I misinterpreted...
It would be lore breaking yes.
Lots of people would complain, yes.
.
He's a total Gary Stu, so yes. :Parcadiadark wrote: »No, this is not necessary. It's a disease, such things are not supposed to be pretty. If someone wants to have vampirism, they should wear their skin with pride. As I had one of my characters be a vampire, I simply used a dwarven hat, which makes a great mask (for example) to hide the face. Difficult of course, if you have an animal race, especially argonian...
Yet verandiss stormravenn can hide it without any penalty??
Edit: I meant ravenwatchh