LadyHeloise wrote: »Unable to tell if you are Korean, but you do look like a pubescent idiot with as much respect for women as a slug.
I'll bend you up like a pretzel, baby.
silky_soft wrote: »Just armor without stupid thigh flaps and hiding shoulders would be sufficient
They can add sexy armour when you add a cohesive and well reasoned argument as to why they need to add it into game, and what it would add in terms of overall game experience.
Go!
Fine, but only if my men can wear something like...
khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »ESO female models dont have the bodies to rock these kind of outfits.
they do if you make your character right.
Not really. You can make a char that is OK looking but sultry hot... not even close. The animations dont help either.
you haven't seen my chars.
Ive seen all kinds of chars.
CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »ESO female models dont have the bodies to rock these kind of outfits.
they do if you make your character right.
Not really. You can make a char that is OK looking but sultry hot... not even close. The animations dont help either.
you haven't seen my chars.
Ive seen all kinds of chars.
not mine though. i'm the master of making sexy characters. here's a taste:
khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »ESO female models dont have the bodies to rock these kind of outfits.
they do if you make your character right.
Not really. You can make a char that is OK looking but sultry hot... not even close. The animations dont help either.
you haven't seen my chars.
Ive seen all kinds of chars.
not mine though. i'm the master of making sexy characters. here's a taste:
Narrow, somewhat drooping shoulders, kind of hunched forward, weirdly bent knees (who stands like that?). Id say its an average body.
CokeVoAYCE wrote: »They can add sexy armour when you add a cohesive and well reasoned argument as to why they need to add it into game, and what it would add in terms of overall game experience.
Go!
there are plenty of reasons!
1. it's lore friendly. remember "the lusty argonian maid"? that's proof that sexy armor is in ES lore. so for all those RPers out there, (which ESO has a ton of them), they should be given the option to RP like that.
2. it's fun, and it's more options for customization! since when was more options ever a bad thing? people in this thread act like it's the end of the world and all armors will be changed into sexy armors. in reality i want to keep all armors the way they currently are, and instead add new armors that add the option to dress skimpy if they want to.
really the reasons why is pretty simple and self explanatory, tbh. the real paragraph to type would be debunking all these slippery slope fallacies and strawmen people come up with to criticize the idea.
CokeVoAYCE wrote: »let's get some sexy female armor in the game!
MMHMMNM, YEAAH....
CokeVoAYCE wrote: »They can add sexy armour when you add a cohesive and well reasoned argument as to why they need to add it into game, and what it would add in terms of overall game experience.
Go!
there are plenty of reasons!
1. it's lore friendly. remember "the lusty argonian maid"? that's proof that sexy armor is in ES lore. so for all those RPers out there, (which ESO has a ton of them), they should be given the option to RP like that.
2. it's fun, and it's more options for customization! since when was more options ever a bad thing? people in this thread act like it's the end of the world and all armors will be changed into sexy armors. in reality i want to keep all armors the way they currently are, and instead add new armors that add the option to dress skimpy if they want to.
really the reasons why is pretty simple and self explanatory, tbh. the real paragraph to type would be debunking all these slippery slope fallacies and strawmen people come up with to criticize the idea.
I agree that from the earlier games, it is lore friendly. Bethesda certainly had half naked and skimpy armour in the past.
But then, society was very different even in the 90's to what it is now.
Now, don't get me wrong, I'm all for freedom of choice. However seeing half naked pixels on a gaming screen does nothing for me personally.
The big problem here is a two pronged thing. Indignation from both sides. On one hand, we have those who want it, and the other side that doesn't. And never the twain shall meet.
I personally like the armours of Tamriel (save for clipping and fitting issues of course) because the armours in this game actually look like they were built for purpose, which is for battle. To me it looks more realistic than people charging into battle with a two piece metal bikini. And Tamriel seems savage enough that most people would need to be ready for battle most of the time.
I'm sure that people of Tamriel also have fun too. (Go into the inn in Ebonheart and check out the top floor and cellar!) but I imagine it is all done very privately, as opposed to in everyone's face.
Having people running around in various states of undress is a little silly to me. It adds nothing into the immersion or lore of a game. Yes the people of Tamriel certainly do have bodies to show off, but what would it actually add in terms of gameplay?
KitLightning wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »let's get some sexy female armor in the game!
MMHMMNM, YEAAH....
Carefull making ESO too atractive...
Afterall, there are adults playing it ...
Right?
CokeVoAYCE wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »They can add sexy armour when you add a cohesive and well reasoned argument as to why they need to add it into game, and what it would add in terms of overall game experience.
Go!
there are plenty of reasons!
1. it's lore friendly. remember "the lusty argonian maid"? that's proof that sexy armor is in ES lore. so for all those RPers out there, (which ESO has a ton of them), they should be given the option to RP like that.
2. it's fun, and it's more options for customization! since when was more options ever a bad thing? people in this thread act like it's the end of the world and all armors will be changed into sexy armors. in reality i want to keep all armors the way they currently are, and instead add new armors that add the option to dress skimpy if they want to.
really the reasons why is pretty simple and self explanatory, tbh. the real paragraph to type would be debunking all these slippery slope fallacies and strawmen people come up with to criticize the idea.
I agree that from the earlier games, it is lore friendly. Bethesda certainly had half naked and skimpy armour in the past.
But then, society was very different even in the 90's to what it is now.
Now, don't get me wrong, I'm all for freedom of choice. However seeing half naked pixels on a gaming screen does nothing for me personally.
The big problem here is a two pronged thing. Indignation from both sides. On one hand, we have those who want it, and the other side that doesn't. And never the twain shall meet.
I personally like the armours of Tamriel (save for clipping and fitting issues of course) because the armours in this game actually look like they were built for purpose, which is for battle. To me it looks more realistic than people charging into battle with a two piece metal bikini. And Tamriel seems savage enough that most people would need to be ready for battle most of the time.
I'm sure that people of Tamriel also have fun too. (Go into the inn in Ebonheart and check out the top floor and cellar!) but I imagine it is all done very privately, as opposed to in everyone's face.
Having people running around in various states of undress is a little silly to me. It adds nothing into the immersion or lore of a game. Yes the people of Tamriel certainly do have bodies to show off, but what would it actually add in terms of gameplay?
save your worries and slippery slope fallacies about how "if skimpy armors come to ESO, then everyone will be naked, and MUH IMMURSION will be destroyed!" there already are skimpy outfits and unrealistic ones in the crown store, and there have been no problems. i'm simply asking for more of them, more options and customization to the standard that was already set with armors from the crowns store.
CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »ESO female models dont have the bodies to rock these kind of outfits.
they do if you make your character right.
Not really. You can make a char that is OK looking but sultry hot... not even close. The animations dont help either.
you haven't seen my chars.
Ive seen all kinds of chars.
not mine though. i'm the master of making sexy characters. here's a taste:
Narrow, somewhat drooping shoulders, kind of hunched forward, weirdly bent knees (who stands like that?). Id say its an average body.
the problem is your impossible standards. the only people upvoting your post are jealous females.
CokeVoAYCE wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »They can add sexy armour when you add a cohesive and well reasoned argument as to why they need to add it into game, and what it would add in terms of overall game experience.
Go!
there are plenty of reasons!
1. it's lore friendly. remember "the lusty argonian maid"? that's proof that sexy armor is in ES lore. so for all those RPers out there, (which ESO has a ton of them), they should be given the option to RP like that.
2. it's fun, and it's more options for customization! since when was more options ever a bad thing? people in this thread act like it's the end of the world and all armors will be changed into sexy armors. in reality i want to keep all armors the way they currently are, and instead add new armors that add the option to dress skimpy if they want to.
really the reasons why is pretty simple and self explanatory, tbh. the real paragraph to type would be debunking all these slippery slope fallacies and strawmen people come up with to criticize the idea.
I agree that from the earlier games, it is lore friendly. Bethesda certainly had half naked and skimpy armour in the past.
But then, society was very different even in the 90's to what it is now.
Now, don't get me wrong, I'm all for freedom of choice. However seeing half naked pixels on a gaming screen does nothing for me personally.
The big problem here is a two pronged thing. Indignation from both sides. On one hand, we have those who want it, and the other side that doesn't. And never the twain shall meet.
I personally like the armours of Tamriel (save for clipping and fitting issues of course) because the armours in this game actually look like they were built for purpose, which is for battle. To me it looks more realistic than people charging into battle with a two piece metal bikini. And Tamriel seems savage enough that most people would need to be ready for battle most of the time.
I'm sure that people of Tamriel also have fun too. (Go into the inn in Ebonheart and check out the top floor and cellar!) but I imagine it is all done very privately, as opposed to in everyone's face.
Having people running around in various states of undress is a little silly to me. It adds nothing into the immersion or lore of a game. Yes the people of Tamriel certainly do have bodies to show off, but what would it actually add in terms of gameplay?
save your worries and slippery slope fallacies about how "if skimpy armors come to ESO, then everyone will be naked, and MUH IMMURSION will be destroyed!" there already are skimpy outfits and unrealistic ones in the crown store, and there have been no problems. i'm simply asking for more of them, more options and customization to the standard that was already set with armors from the crowns store.
You clearly only read the last paragraph there, sport
Again I agree that there have been outfits added to the crown store.
But you're still not telling me what it adds to the overall game experience beyond "mah choice to see things!"
khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »ESO female models dont have the bodies to rock these kind of outfits.
they do if you make your character right.
Not really. You can make a char that is OK looking but sultry hot... not even close. The animations dont help either.
you haven't seen my chars.
Ive seen all kinds of chars.
not mine though. i'm the master of making sexy characters. here's a taste:
Narrow, somewhat drooping shoulders, kind of hunched forward, weirdly bent knees (who stands like that?). Id say its an average body.
the problem is your impossible standards. the only people upvoting your post are jealous females.
I asked for sultry hot. You said the game could deliver that. But it cant.
Now, don't get me wrong, I'm all for freedom of choice. However seeing half naked pixels on a gaming screen does nothing for me personally.
Daemons_Bane wrote: »I would agree that it needs a good reason for being implemented.. Your most "Lore friendly" reason so far, has been the Lusty Argonian Maid book, which has nothing to do with armor.. There are no good reason/use for armor like that in Tamriel.. Yes we have ladies of the night that you can pick up for coin, but they do no wear armor.. They are mostly already halfway undressed and waiting in the inns.. At least if you played Morrowind
CokeVoAYCE wrote: »Daemons_Bane wrote: »I would agree that it needs a good reason for being implemented.. Your most "Lore friendly" reason so far, has been the Lusty Argonian Maid book, which has nothing to do with armor.. There are no good reason/use for armor like that in Tamriel.. Yes we have ladies of the night that you can pick up for coin, but they do no wear armor.. They are mostly already halfway undressed and waiting in the inns.. At least if you played Morrowind
why not have that clothing exist? it doesn't have to be armor.
CokeVoAYCE wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »They can add sexy armour when you add a cohesive and well reasoned argument as to why they need to add it into game, and what it would add in terms of overall game experience.
Go!
there are plenty of reasons!
1. it's lore friendly. remember "the lusty argonian maid"? that's proof that sexy armor is in ES lore. so for all those RPers out there, (which ESO has a ton of them), they should be given the option to RP like that.
2. it's fun, and it's more options for customization! since when was more options ever a bad thing? people in this thread act like it's the end of the world and all armors will be changed into sexy armors. in reality i want to keep all armors the way they currently are, and instead add new armors that add the option to dress skimpy if they want to.
really the reasons why is pretty simple and self explanatory, tbh. the real paragraph to type would be debunking all these slippery slope fallacies and strawmen people come up with to criticize the idea.
I agree that from the earlier games, it is lore friendly. Bethesda certainly had half naked and skimpy armour in the past.
But then, society was very different even in the 90's to what it is now.
Now, don't get me wrong, I'm all for freedom of choice. However seeing half naked pixels on a gaming screen does nothing for me personally.
The big problem here is a two pronged thing. Indignation from both sides. On one hand, we have those who want it, and the other side that doesn't. And never the twain shall meet.
I personally like the armours of Tamriel (save for clipping and fitting issues of course) because the armours in this game actually look like they were built for purpose, which is for battle. To me it looks more realistic than people charging into battle with a two piece metal bikini. And Tamriel seems savage enough that most people would need to be ready for battle most of the time.
I'm sure that people of Tamriel also have fun too. (Go into the inn in Ebonheart and check out the top floor and cellar!) but I imagine it is all done very privately, as opposed to in everyone's face.
Having people running around in various states of undress is a little silly to me. It adds nothing into the immersion or lore of a game. Yes the people of Tamriel certainly do have bodies to show off, but what would it actually add in terms of gameplay?
save your worries and slippery slope fallacies about how "if skimpy armors come to ESO, then everyone will be naked, and MUH IMMURSION will be destroyed!" there already are skimpy outfits and unrealistic ones in the crown store, and there have been no problems. i'm simply asking for more of them, more options and customization to the standard that was already set with armors from the crowns store.
You clearly only read the last paragraph there, sport
Again I agree that there have been outfits added to the crown store.
But you're still not telling me what it adds to the overall game experience beyond "mah choice to see things!"
is "muh choice to see things, it being lore friendly, and for RPers" not enough for you? do there need to be big complex reasons why it should be added? it's a simple thing i'm asking to be added for simple reasons.
CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »CokeVoAYCE wrote: »khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »ESO female models dont have the bodies to rock these kind of outfits.
they do if you make your character right.
Not really. You can make a char that is OK looking but sultry hot... not even close. The animations dont help either.
you haven't seen my chars.
Ive seen all kinds of chars.
not mine though. i'm the master of making sexy characters. here's a taste:
Narrow, somewhat drooping shoulders, kind of hunched forward, weirdly bent knees (who stands like that?). Id say its an average body.
the problem is your impossible standards. the only people upvoting your post are jealous females.
I asked for sultry hot. You said the game could deliver that. But it cant.
sorry i can't create a 3d model of hannah montannah to pop out of your screen for you.