Gothlander wrote: »FFXIV for 9 months and I'll just say this: After driving a mercedes benz for the last 9 months, why on earth would I switch to a Kia?
Are you saying FFXIV is a Mercedes and ESO is a Kia? lol
I don't know about car comparisons. But if you look at the first 3 pages of general discussion on both Elder Trolls Online and Final Fannies official forums. You will see about zero complaints on Final Fannies forums and 16 complaints about bugs, lag, performance, and skills not working properly on Elder Trolls Online. I'll take a Kia If it runs better than a Mercedes Benz.
But so far the Mercedes is winning...
Eugenstash wrote: »Gothlander wrote: »FFXIV for 9 months and I'll just say this: After driving a mercedes benz for the last 9 months, why on earth would I switch to a Kia?
Are you saying FFXIV is a Mercedes and ESO is a Kia? lol
I'm saying that in terms of polish yes. In terms of game play I feel they both offer a different experience. I honestly ESO's free from combat hands down. In that respect (combat) it's comparing apples to oranges although I feel the tab targeting system is outdated for mmos anyways. In terms of polish and quality, yes I'm saying ESO is a Kia lol. If I could get both cars for the same price, the choice is obvious.
Eugenstash wrote: »Gothlander wrote: »FFXIV for 9 months and I'll just say this: After driving a mercedes benz for the last 9 months, why on earth would I switch to a Kia?
Are you saying FFXIV is a Mercedes and ESO is a Kia? lol
I'm saying that in terms of polish yes. In terms of game play I feel they both offer a different experience. I honestly ESO's free from combat hands down. In that respect (combat) it's comparing apples to oranges although I feel the tab targeting system is outdated for mmos anyways. In terms of polish and quality, yes I'm saying ESO is a Kia lol. If I could get both cars for the same price, the choice is obvious.
As some who plays a little of both, I agree about FFXIV. Eso looks better and is probably more fun to play. However, ESO is miles behind FF in terms of professionalism. FF wouldn't dare launch updates in the state that ESO considers acceptable (and then takes weeks to fix, if at all). ESO could learn tons by looking at the way the FF group finder works, zone difficulty. I've never submitted a ticket to FF but I cannot imagine that I would get a Chet esq reply "sorry I would help you but I can't be bothered. Bye'
Merge the two games and you would have the ultimate MMO but listing what makes each one good and bad comes out very much on the side of FF, in my opinion.
Apocalypse1981 wrote: »Its immersion not emersion.
Eugenstash wrote: »However, I rarely found myself challenged through the base game questing even when I wasnt over leveled. I get the streamlining questing but were not all care bears here. Some of us like to be challenged even during the leveling process.
Hmpft, FFXIV... Better performances than ESO, that's all. I played it for two years and left for ESO when it hit the consoles, I'm never going back. I hate so much what they've done with summoner, FFXI was way better imo and was truely a FINAL FANTASY episode, FFXIV just stole what they could from previous games, even the races are from FFXI but with a different name and some additions...
I can understand that some players prefer FFXIV over ESO, but I just don't. x) FFXIV is a pay to play MMO, I won't pay to play it anymore, if it goes free or buy to play, I might. ESO is a buy to play MMO, I am playing it and paying for ESO Plus membership, go figure.
Eugenstash wrote: »Hmpft, FFXIV... Better performances than ESO, that's all. I played it for two years and left for ESO when it hit the consoles, I'm never going back. I hate so much what they've done with summoner, FFXI was way better imo and was truely a FINAL FANTASY episode, FFXIV just stole what they could from previous games, even the races are from FFXI but with a different name and some additions...
I can understand that some players prefer FFXIV over ESO, but I just don't. x) FFXIV is a pay to play MMO, I won't pay to play it anymore, if it goes free or buy to play, I might. ESO is a buy to play MMO, I am playing it and paying for ESO Plus membership, go figure.
FFXIV:ARR is my first FF game so I can't comment on past final fantasy games. But lets be honest here. Is not every ES game past the first just stealing from the games before it? Better yet, are not all sequels doing just that? Never the less I have tried to find an alternative to FFXIV and was hoping to find that here but if the first comment my best friend made while playing with me was "I cant get out of 3rd person mode" there's an issue. I might have went off topic there.
Hmpft, FFXIV... Better performances than ESO, that's all. I played it for two years and left for ESO when it hit the consoles, I'm never going back. I hate so much what they've done with summoner, FFXI was way better imo and was truely a FINAL FANTASY episode, FFXIV just stole what they could from previous games, even the races are from FFXI but with a different name and some additions...
I can understand that some players prefer FFXIV over ESO, but I just don't. x) FFXIV is a pay to play MMO, I won't pay to play it anymore, if it goes free or buy to play, I might. ESO is a buy to play MMO, I am playing it and paying for ESO Plus membership, go figure.
Eugenstash wrote: »Hmpft, FFXIV... Better performances than ESO, that's all. I played it for two years and left for ESO when it hit the consoles, I'm never going back. I hate so much what they've done with summoner, FFXI was way better imo and was truely a FINAL FANTASY episode, FFXIV just stole what they could from previous games, even the races are from FFXI but with a different name and some additions...
I can understand that some players prefer FFXIV over ESO, but I just don't. x) FFXIV is a pay to play MMO, I won't pay to play it anymore, if it goes free or buy to play, I might. ESO is a buy to play MMO, I am playing it and paying for ESO Plus membership, go figure.
FFXIV:ARR is my first FF game so I can't comment on past final fantasy games. But lets be honest here. Is not every ES game past the first just stealing from the games before it? Better yet, are not all sequels doing just that? Never the less I have tried to find an alternative to FFXIV and was hoping to find that here but if the first comment my best friend made while playing with me was "I cant get out of 3rd person mode" there's an issue. I might have went off topic there.
The Elder Scrolls series is not like the FINAL FANTASY ones. Each FINAL FANTASY is a new game, with new races, new countries, everything is new but there are some recurent things like chocobos or summonings. To be in the same world as a previous FF game, it is named like this FFX-2 for example, if it's FFXII, it's a new game. FFXIV is not FFXI-2, it's not in the same world or anything.
Each Elder Scrolls game takes place in a different region but it's always in Tamriel but in a different time line. That's why they aren't just stealing like in FFXIV, because it's in the exact same world. x) I am a FINAL FANTASY fan since FFVIII, but I don't like a lot of the decisions they made for FFXIV, that doesn't mean it's a bad game, that only mean I prefer ESO. A lot of players are enjoying FFXIV and that's good for them, I'm getting bored real quick in FFXIV so I left. Not getting bored in ESO, so I stay, that's all.
Hmpft, FFXIV... Better performances than ESO, that's all. I played it for two years and left for ESO when it hit the consoles, I'm never going back. I hate so much what they've done with summoner, FFXI was way better imo and was truely a FINAL FANTASY episode, FFXIV just stole what they could from previous games, even the races are from FFXI but with a different name and some additions...
I can understand that some players prefer FFXIV over ESO, but I just don't. x) FFXIV is a pay to play MMO, I won't pay to play it anymore, if it goes free or buy to play, I might. ESO is a buy to play MMO, I am playing it and paying for ESO Plus membership, go figure.
Buy to play can be a problem for some because it is something they do not want to pay each month or cannot pay, either way that is is a choice for the individual and there is no right or wrong answer. However, if we compare both games for the past 12 months, that would cost me about £95 subs (ive not played it for that long but for the sake of maths) in that time in eso we have had 9,500 crowns worth of updates. Excluding any discounts I make it about £45 for those cash, of course you cannot normally buy the exact no of crowns and a lot of people choose to spend the left over on mounts etc, so let's call it £50 to be generous.
This leaves £45 difference in the games, or £3.75 a month. £3.75 a month for far more reliable servers, pretty much bug free gameplay and far more group based content seems good value in my opinion. I'm not pretending that monthly fee is cheaper or for everyone, but when you tally up the amounts spent on DLC and crown store items over a year the gap is far less that it seems.
Hmpft, FFXIV... Better performances than ESO, that's all. I played it for two years and left for ESO when it hit the consoles, I'm never going back. I hate so much what they've done with summoner, FFXI was way better imo and was truely a FINAL FANTASY episode, FFXIV just stole what they could from previous games, even the races are from FFXI but with a different name and some additions...
I can understand that some players prefer FFXIV over ESO, but I just don't. x) FFXIV is a pay to play MMO, I won't pay to play it anymore, if it goes free or buy to play, I might. ESO is a buy to play MMO, I am playing it and paying for ESO Plus membership, go figure.
Buy to play can be a problem for some because it is something they do not want to pay each month or cannot pay, either way that is is a choice for the individual and there is no right or wrong answer. However, if we compare both games for the past 12 months, that would cost me about £95 subs (ive not played it for that long but for the sake of maths) in that time in eso we have had 9,500 crowns worth of updates. Excluding any discounts I make it about £45 for those cash, of course you cannot normally buy the exact no of crowns and a lot of people choose to spend the left over on mounts etc, so let's call it £50 to be generous.
This leaves £45 difference in the games, or £3.75 a month. £3.75 a month for far more reliable servers, pretty much bug free gameplay and far more group based content seems good value in my opinion. I'm not pretending that monthly fee is cheaper or for everyone, but when you tally up the amounts spent on DLC and crown store items over a year the gap is far less that it seems.
I agree with that.
For me it's not about prices or performances, it's about having fun and enjoying a game. Despite its flaws, I am enjoying more ESO than the very repetive - in my opinion - but very well developped FFXIV, that's just a matter of taste after all. I am glad that others do enjoy more FFXIV than ESO.
Everytime I see an update for FFXIV, it bores me, everytime I see an update for ESO, I am excited! If you feel the same way for FFXIV, don't waste a second on ESO, go play FFXIV, I want you to have fun like I do!
Eugenstash wrote: »Eugenstash wrote: »Hmpft, FFXIV... Better performances than ESO, that's all. I played it for two years and left for ESO when it hit the consoles, I'm never going back. I hate so much what they've done with summoner, FFXI was way better imo and was truely a FINAL FANTASY episode, FFXIV just stole what they could from previous games, even the races are from FFXI but with a different name and some additions...
I can understand that some players prefer FFXIV over ESO, but I just don't. x) FFXIV is a pay to play MMO, I won't pay to play it anymore, if it goes free or buy to play, I might. ESO is a buy to play MMO, I am playing it and paying for ESO Plus membership, go figure.
FFXIV:ARR is my first FF game so I can't comment on past final fantasy games. But lets be honest here. Is not every ES game past the first just stealing from the games before it? Better yet, are not all sequels doing just that? Never the less I have tried to find an alternative to FFXIV and was hoping to find that here but if the first comment my best friend made while playing with me was "I cant get out of 3rd person mode" there's an issue. I might have went off topic there.
The Elder Scrolls series is not like the FINAL FANTASY ones. Each FINAL FANTASY is a new game, with new races, new countries, everything is new but there are some recurent things like chocobos or summonings. To be in the same world as a previous FF game, it is named like this FFX-2 for example, if it's FFXII, it's a new game. FFXIV is not FFXI-2, it's not in the same world or anything.
Each Elder Scrolls game takes place in a different region but it's always in Tamriel but in a different time line. That's why they aren't just stealing like in FFXIV, because it's in the exact same world. x) I am a FINAL FANTASY fan since FFVIII, but I don't like a lot of the decisions they made for FFXIV, that doesn't mean it's a bad game, that only mean I prefer ESO. A lot of players are enjoying FFXIV and that's good for them, I'm getting bored real quick in FFXIV so I left. Not getting bored in ESO, so I stay, that's all.
The only way a game studio can "steal" content is if they don't own the rights to that content. I'm not sure I agree with your statement but I respect your opinion.
What's good about FFXIV:
- Buttery Smooth Performance
- No lag spikes or disconnects
- Lots of Classes
- More Content than any other mmo
- The Cross Hotbar- Allows 16 on tap active skills, and the ability to cycle between 256 more.
- The Armoury System- The ability to switch between class and equip all class specific gear and abilities at the blink of an eye
- Huge expansions- 50 hours of story, 3-4 dungeons, new systems, expanded systems
- Big patches- The patches there are as big as some mmos expansion.
- A fluid and adaptable group finder
- A raid finder
- Class specific story
- Races without passives
- The job system- Can try and play every class on one character and some skills are shareable
- Fates- Like Dolmens except they have more variety and some fates with bosses are unsoloable
- Chocobo Mounts- They can actually fight with you and level up
- Relic Weapons- Class specific weapons that are often BiS powered up thru mostly perpetual quests
- Artifact Armor- Class specific armor unlocked via questing
- Group Centric- You can play like a solo player queuing up for content perfectly tuned for groups
- Good Class Balance
What's bad about FFXIV:
- Global Cooldown
- Crafting- It may be a bonus to some but it is a negative for me. Having to level multiple crafts to be efficient.
- Limited Cross Classing- I came from FFXI which had even more cross classing than ESO,limited in XIV.
- Tab Target- I am in love with aiming targets now and tab target is less exciting.
- Slightly homogenized classes, not enough freedom cross classing
- Heavily Instanced
- Small Zone but beautiful
- No 100% voice acting, I could deal with sidequest not being voiced but main story is a no go for me
- Limited Housing Availability but like that if you do get one it is fully operational with multiple guildies
What's good about ESO:
- Pretty good main story
- Fantastic Side quest stories
- Open Ended class system
- Combat system
- Graphics
- Very open world
- Buy to Play without restrictions up until update 11
- Races with meaningful passives
- Crafting System
What's bad about ESO:
- Open Ended Class system- Could be more open if class lines weren't locked into archetypes
- Combat System- While it is an exciting combat system, it doesn't always perform as it should
- Bad Class Balance- There is constant nerfing and boosting due to this
- Shaky Performance- When it works well it is fantastic, but when it doesn't not good at all
- Bugs
- Crafting bags and dye system being locked behind the monthly paywall.
- Races with meaningful passive- The races should be minor differences but there is like a BiS except it is RiS
- Not enough meaty content
- Shoddy Group Finder
For me XIV beats ESO in a bunch of categories. Up until this upcoming patch with locking stuff behind the paywall. I still would have chose ESO because it's more fun for me and it's more similar to FFXI. Not so sure at the moment.
What's good about FFXIV:What's bad about FFXIV:
- Global Cooldown
- Crafting- It may be a bonus to some but it is a negative for me. Having to level multiple crafts to be efficient.
- Limited Cross Classing- I came from FFXI which had even more cross classing than ESO,limited in XIV.
- Tab Target- I am in love with aiming targets now and tab target is less exciting.
- Slightly homogenized classes, not enough freedom cross classing
- Heavily Instanced
- Small Zone but beautiful
- No 100% voice acting, I could deal with sidequest not being voiced but main story is a no go for me
- Limited Housing Availability but like that if you do get one it is fully operational with multiple guildies
What's bad about ESO:- Open Ended Class system- Could be more open if class lines weren't locked into archetypes
- Combat System- While it is an exciting combat system, it doesn't always perform as it should
- Bad Class Balance- There is constant nerfing and boosting due to this
- Shaky Performance- When it works well it is fantastic, but when it doesn't not good at all
- Bugs
- Crafting bags and dye system being locked behind the monthly paywall.
- Races with meaningful passive- The races should be minor differences but there is like a BiS except it is RiS
- Not enough meaty content
- Shoddy Group Finder
For the global cooldown FFXI handled that perfectly. To keep from spamming a skill repeatedly over and over you had tp and mp properly balanced.WanderingJarlPuncher wrote: »What's good about FFXIV:What's bad about FFXIV:
- Global Cooldown
- Crafting- It may be a bonus to some but it is a negative for me. Having to level multiple crafts to be efficient.
- Limited Cross Classing- I came from FFXI which had even more cross classing than ESO,limited in XIV.
- Tab Target- I am in love with aiming targets now and tab target is less exciting.
- Slightly homogenized classes, not enough freedom cross classing
- Heavily Instanced
- Small Zone but beautiful
- No 100% voice acting, I could deal with sidequest not being voiced but main story is a no go for me
- Limited Housing Availability but like that if you do get one it is fully operational with multiple guildies
What's bad about ESO:- Open Ended Class system- Could be more open if class lines weren't locked into archetypes
- Combat System- While it is an exciting combat system, it doesn't always perform as it should
- Bad Class Balance- There is constant nerfing and boosting due to this
- Shaky Performance- When it works well it is fantastic, but when it doesn't not good at all
- Bugs
- Crafting bags and dye system being locked behind the monthly paywall.
- Races with meaningful passive- The races should be minor differences but there is like a BiS except it is RiS
- Not enough meaty content
- Shoddy Group Finder
global cooldwon = sound goodfrom a roleplay angle. eso allows you to spam Arrow spray aka magically having 5 arrows pop in your hands non without recharging.
crafting: if you want to craft a house you need to build you smithing skill cuz cooking wont make solid nails and your wooden door frame wont be there if you can only use tailoring
limited cross classing, they actually did this willingly to avoid OPness from the skyrim franchise, i also played FF11.
tab target when i want to taunt a boss i want to nuke a specific monster i want THAT specific monster not the monster going in front of him when i cast my nuke //taunt or CC.
homogenized classing: sounds good with me makes you require a group instead of solo mode
heavyly instanced : sound god as well since grouping is part of mmo and is a huge aspect of soail activity in a game.
no voice acting , agree but but i would rather see some quests in eso being voice acting skippable some npcs talk so much its a burden.
i need to tank my gf aggro bbl if i live through to finish this if the watchdogs didnt cut it down