Sorcs, truly that bad now?

Wreuntzylla

Grao wrote: »

Burning_Talons wrote: »

Grao wrote: »

kazter304b16_ESO wrote: »

With the removal of vet ranks looking to start up my sorc again, who was also my first to vet 1.

However,all I see is how bad they are now. I have a magplar whom I actually find dps boring but prefer healing.

How bad is magical now? Huge difference between magic a and stam for dps?

While sorcerer Magicka DPS wasn't particularly affected by the changes in DB, the class still features among the lowest DPS and least flexible, entertaining build. Magicka sorcerers still have to triple slot 2 abilities, one of which nightblades get as a passive and that considerably reduces the number of useful actives you can have in your bars. Pets are still close to useless at least in DPS builds as their damage does not scale with your champion points and because they are not affected by the summoner's passives. Meanwhile, the classes survivability in single combat content, both for PvE and PvP was severely nerfed.

It seems there are still some interesting possibilities for stamina sorcerers, but if your intention is to create a magicka caster, I'd advise any other class.

Burning_Talons wrote: »

Sorcs are doing fine. Except the terribad ones who just complain. This is torwards PvP

Funny... Though you clearly main Dks and second as a templar, you went straight to your sorcerer to run tests when DB was released for Xbox? Don't advise players in what you have such small experience on.

I seen sorcs completely dominating post DB if they can do it anyone can except for the ones who arent good

A person dominating another in PvP depends on the quality of both sides, besides... How have you even seen anything in PvP? You are in a XBox One... As far as I am aware your game is so crazy bugged right now a huge aount of your player base can barely login in a city...

Ah, you are mistaken. They can log in, they just can't stay in. AP galore for DPS sorc!