Look, if you do the math, subscribers pay more overtime; we hardly get anything except maybe 3 days off our research time and barely enough crowns to buy anything real nice. We also lose everything (including DLC) when we stop subscribing.
People who pay for the DLC get that -forever.- It can't be taken from them. You cannot compare yourselves to a subscriber, because you keep everything even if you stop paying.
DLC purchasers get everything forever.
Let subscribers have one thing: an unlimited crafting bag as an incentive to pay more.
You DLC purchasers pay $180 for forever access.
We subscribers pay $180 for something temporary. We stop paying we lose access.
Let us have ONE nice incentive. Your nice incentive is your forever-acess.
LET US SUBSCRIBERS HAVE ONE NICE THING.
I'll stop paying my subscription if they give this to non-subscribing payers.
If you guys pay less for forever access, why shouldn't I?
Seriously. What about this being a nice incentive for people who lose their investment once they stop
paying?
You are all paying cheaper something you keep forever.
Subscribers are paying more for something temporary.
It is NOT equal.
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/261499/crating-bag-exclusivity-is-unfair/p1
There was a thread that got locked about crafting bags. I am against putting it in the crown store. Let us subscribers have one nice thing.
I'll just quote my response here:Look, if you do the math, subscribers pay more overtime; we hardly get anything except maybe 3 days off our research time and barely enough crowns to buy anything real nice. We also lose everything (including DLC) when we stop subscribing.
People who pay for the DLC get that -forever.- It can't be taken from them. You cannot compare yourselves to a subscriber, because you keep everything even if you stop paying.
DLC purchasers get everything forever.
Let subscribers have one thing: an unlimited crafting bag as an incentive to pay more.
You DLC purchasers pay $180 for forever access.
We subscribers pay $180 for something temporary. We stop paying we lose access.
Let us have ONE nice incentive. Your nice incentive is your forever-acess.
LET US SUBSCRIBERS HAVE ONE NICE THING.
AndI'll stop paying my subscription if they give this to non-subscribing payers.
If you guys pay less for forever access, why shouldn't I?
Seriously. What about this being a nice incentive for people who lose their investment once they stop
paying?
You are all paying cheaper something you keep forever.
Subscribers are paying more for something temporary.
It is NOT equal.
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/261499/crating-bag-exclusivity-is-unfair/p1
There was a thread that got locked about crafting bags. I am against putting it in the crown store. Let us subscribers have one nice thing.
I'll just quote my response here:Look, if you do the math, subscribers pay more overtime; we hardly get anything except maybe 3 days off our research time and barely enough crowns to buy anything real nice. We also lose everything (including DLC) when we stop subscribing.
People who pay for the DLC get that -forever.- It can't be taken from them. You cannot compare yourselves to a subscriber, because you keep everything even if you stop paying.
DLC purchasers get everything forever.
Let subscribers have one thing: an unlimited crafting bag as an incentive to pay more.
You DLC purchasers pay $180 for forever access.
We subscribers pay $180 for something temporary. We stop paying we lose access.
Let us have ONE nice incentive. Your nice incentive is your forever-acess.
LET US SUBSCRIBERS HAVE ONE NICE THING.
AndI'll stop paying my subscription if they give this to non-subscribing payers.
If you guys pay less for forever access, why shouldn't I?
Seriously. What about this being a nice incentive for people who lose their investment once they stop
paying?
You are all paying cheaper something you keep forever.
Subscribers are paying more for something temporary.
It is NOT equal.
I'm torn on this one a little bit, since I used to be a subscriber. I subscribed faithfully on PC since early access and have the tiger senche to prove it. I made the transfer to XBone and subscribed to ESO+ until January of this year. Why did I unsub? Because of the unreliability of ESO+ on consoles. Not getting my monthly Crowns, plus losing access to my in-game bonuses from time to time was not fun. Having to micromanage my subscription was a PITA.
Now, I support the game by purchasing the DLC and other Crown Store items. I believe I'm still just as LOYAL as the ESO+ members.
I understand entirely that the ESO+ membership needs to have better perks, but this is one perk that provides a decided advantage and is behind an arbitrary paywall. Why should it be something exclusive to Plus members? Why can't I, as a LOYAL player have access to this? It's not like an exclusive mount - it's a quality of life item. And it's not just convenience either, as they keep adding more and more items in-game (new alchemy re-agents and oils as well as all the new crafting style materials, e.g.), it's going to become increasingly difficult and burdensome as a non-ESO+ member.
ESO+ members say "Save up and become a plus member." I say "I am saving up and buying Crown packs for all the things I want, so I'm just as loyal." Why should I have to switch how I've chosen to be loyal to obtain such a game-changing advantage?
Yes, ESO+ members should have something nice and exclusive - many, in fact - but I don't believe this should be it.
That said, I doubt they'll change it, so I'd like to see limited versions of these for sale in the Crown Store. Something that will ease the other half of the LOYAL players' burden. These could be bags that have limited slots and take up a space in your bank. They could even separate them out into alchemy bags, provisioning bags, etc. - each taking up a bank slot. There are ways this could be handled so that LOYAL non-ESO+ players can have access to something that will ease the ever-growing inventory burden. Can we meet in the middle here?
I don't understand the thought process on how those that buy and spend crowns are not contributing to the advancement of the game.
If you buy a subscription for 6 months that is $90. If I but $90 worth of crowns during this time, how exactly have you contributed more to the company?
I don't understand the thought process on how those that buy and spend crowns are not contributing to the advancement of the game.
If you buy a subscription for 6 months that is $90. If I but $90 worth of crowns during this time, how exactly have you contributed more to the company?
Do you plan to buy $90.00 worth of crowns every 6 months as a commitment? Can ZOS depend on your money every 6 months? Just wondering.Not being snarky,but it's a point.
I don't understand the thought process on how those that buy and spend crowns are not contributing to the advancement of the game.
If you buy a subscription for 6 months that is $90. If I but $90 worth of crowns during this time, how exactly have you contributed more to the company?
Do you plan to buy $90.00 worth of crowns every 6 months as a commitment? Can ZOS depend on your money every 6 months? Just wondering.Not being snarky,but it's a point.
It's not a point. Most subs are arguing that they are the ones supporting the game. It does not matter if I spend $1 or $500 every 6 months, it is still going into their pockets.
Was not referring to ZOS perspective, rather all the QQing going on by subs on these forums about how they are the only ones that support the game.
I completely understand why ZOS would make it sub only, and I really don't have a problem with it, but if it went into the store and 10,000 people like me paid $30 for it, I don't see how that is not helping the company put out better future content.