Female armor models( Racial style poll!)

Elloa

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

I like the fact that ESO is a bit more realistic than let's say Tera or Black Desert, but it's a FANTASY world, and to have female character with pleasant outfit is part of the fun aswell!

I've no idea if this whole thing is done due to censorship or buisness manipulation (force us to get Costume in the crown store) but no matter the reason, in both case, it's ugly!

Vangy

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Elloa wrote: »

I like the fact that ESO is a bit more realistic than let's say Tera or Black Desert, but it's a FANTASY world, and to have female character with pleasant outfit is part of the fun aswell!

I've no idea if this whole thing is done due to censorship or buisness manipulation (force us to get Costume in the crown store) but no matter the reason, in both case, it's ugly!

Thank you for bringing sanity and putting this thread back on track. Here have an awesome from me.

DerpyShadowz

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Where's the perv option?

On a more serious note alot of the armor styles bother me around the neck area, they just disappear into nothing

Vangy

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

I Highlander l wrote: »

Where's the perv option?

Refer to:

Vangy wrote: »

CaptainBeerDude wrote: »

Can't vote. Where is the option for sexy time armour in a totally perv way...

I recommend the whisperweft gala costume or the sand kissed salwar. Both are extremely sexy in a totally pervy dancer/hooker girl kind of way. Yes they arent armour... but they should satisfy your needs

DerpyShadowz

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Vangy wrote: »

I Highlander l wrote: »

Where's the perv option?

Refer to:

Vangy wrote: »

CaptainBeerDude wrote: »

Can't vote. Where is the option for sexy time armour in a totally perv way...

I recommend the whisperweft gala costume or the sand kissed salwar. Both are extremely sexy in a totally pervy dancer/hooker girl kind of way. Yes they arent armour... but they should satisfy your needs

Thats another issue that bothers me, bad early access choices, horrible skin tone & tattoo, cant wear the more revealing stuff P:

Vangy

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

I Highlander l wrote: »

Vangy wrote: »

I Highlander l wrote: »

Where's the perv option?

Refer to:

Vangy wrote: »

CaptainBeerDude wrote: »

Can't vote. Where is the option for sexy time armour in a totally perv way...

I recommend the whisperweft gala costume or the sand kissed salwar. Both are extremely sexy in a totally pervy dancer/hooker girl kind of way. Yes they arent armour... but they should satisfy your needs

Thats another issue that bothers me, bad early access choices, horrible skin tone & tattoo, cant wear the more revealing stuff P:

ETA for appearance change: 2020.... Gotta wait brah. It will come soon.

Moonshadow66

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Does someone remember Update 6 (around February 2015) where they botched the Redguard light and Orc heavy armor?







Just a reminder..

CherryCake

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Let us women look like women!!!

CherryCake

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Oh cookies!!!

NewBlacksmurf

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Moonshadow66 wrote: »

Does someone remember Update 6 (around February 2015) where they botched the Redguard light and Orc heavy armor?







Just a reminder..

Yep. I'm still upset

CaptainBeerDude

Shunravi wrote: »

dday3six wrote: »

I could never get on board with realistic armor if the weapons are going to be completely lacking in practicality. Staves being magic are one thing, but most of the swords, daggers, axes and bows would have terrible function in combat. They're too heavy, oddly balanced and/or shaped, too thick, too long, and so on. From a fantasy aspect they are fine, but once injected with dose of realism they're completely impractical.

Seriously... I mean if the naysayers are so gung-hu on realism, they should be up in arms about the weapons.

just look at these terribly balanced paddles



carried on the back no less. thats a horrible place to carry a sword longer than your elbow to fingertip (which by itself isnt a great idea) let alone a greatsword.

What's the armour in the third pic?

Vangy

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

NewBlacksmurf wrote: »

Moonshadow66 wrote: »

Does someone remember Update 6 (around February 2015) where they botched the Redguard light and Orc heavy armor?







Just a reminder..

Yep. I'm still upset

As am I. Which was the reason for this thread being started. This is an upsetting trend...

CaptainBeerDude

Vangy wrote: »

CaptainBeerDude wrote: »

Can't vote. Where is the option for sexy time armour in a totally perv way...

I recommend the whisperweft gala costume or the sand kissed salwar. Both are extremely sexy in a totally pervy dancer/hooker girl kind of way. Yes they arent armour... but they should satisfy your needs

And the ladies should totally be able to put a medium armour loin cloth on their He-Man wannabe toons that they'll never admit to having...

Daraugh

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

I'm not looking for halter tops or sexy armor. I have my Dark Seducer costume for that when I want it. I just want it to fit properly! No hunchback, no monoboob, no squashing, no jamming my female characters into armor made for males!

When I wear sexy armor/costume, I want it to fit. When I wear regular armor I want it to fit. Why is this even a question?

Chelos

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

This whole thing of "fixing" the armors is so ridicculous if you take a look at the very revealing costumes sold in the shop.
There's nothing wrong with a sexy looking argonian Female that has some of her scales of exciement show.
And having a female look teasing is not sexist! Provided a female player who doesn't want her character to reveal too much detail can choose an outfit that doesn't.
I mean come on, violence, blood and gore (which is doubtlessly the worst thing in existence) is ok while style, and a very small amount of erotic detail (certainly the better part in life) is bad? This is just the wrong way of thinking.

Shunravi

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

CaptainBeerDude wrote: »

Shunravi wrote: »

dday3six wrote: »

I could never get on board with realistic armor if the weapons are going to be completely lacking in practicality. Staves being magic are one thing, but most of the swords, daggers, axes and bows would have terrible function in combat. They're too heavy, oddly balanced and/or shaped, too thick, too long, and so on. From a fantasy aspect they are fine, but once injected with dose of realism they're completely impractical.

Seriously... I mean if the naysayers are so gung-hu on realism, they should be up in arms about the weapons.

just look at these terribly balanced paddles



carried on the back no less. thats a horrible place to carry a sword longer than your elbow to fingertip (which by itself isnt a great idea) let alone a greatsword.

What's the armour in the third pic?

theher0not

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Obliterate wrote: »

No idea who finds the game sexy, that's hilarious. People need to get out more

Just because we find something online "hot" (as OP describes it) doesn't mean we arn't doing things IRL. People can like multiple things.

Ch4mpTW

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Sexy armor is absolutely fine. After all, this game IS rated "M" for mature via ESRB ratings... So in other words: Cleavage, nudity, partial nudity, profanity, revealing armor/clothes, sex scenes, etc. SHOULD be absolutely fine and within the confines of a game designed for ages 17 and up...

. . .Meanwhile the censorship is to the point that thighs can't even be portrayed, as shown by the incoming Altmer costume.

But! Street Fighter, a game rated "T" for teens can have Cammy's butt-cheeks hanging out literally (in a 1-piece suit), and portray all kinds of sexual attire. Even the Smash Bros. franchise (rated "E" for everyone) is bringing sexy back with Zero Suit Samus and newly-released Bayonetta. But, you have thighs being covered in a game rated "M" for mature, and women with their breasts being shrunken... Yeah, okay ZOS.

Moonshadow66

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

CaptainBeerDude wrote: »

Shunravi wrote: »

dday3six wrote: »

I could never get on board with realistic armor if the weapons are going to be completely lacking in practicality. Staves being magic are one thing, but most of the swords, daggers, axes and bows would have terrible function in combat. They're too heavy, oddly balanced and/or shaped, too thick, too long, and so on. From a fantasy aspect they are fine, but once injected with dose of realism they're completely impractical.

Seriously... I mean if the naysayers are so gung-hu on realism, they should be up in arms about the weapons.

just look at these terribly balanced paddles



carried on the back no less. thats a horrible place to carry a sword longer than your elbow to fingertip (which by itself isnt a great idea) let alone a greatsword.

What's the armour in the third pic?

These are "the Emperor's new clothes"...

Uriel_Nocturne

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

1) Bewbs...

2) It's fine. This is a fantasy game set in a High Fantasy atmosphere. Armor, Weapons, none of it has to reflect modern physics or actually cover much of anything. When playing a game such as this, suspension of belief is quite necessary.

3) We're running around as Elves and Orcs, the armor doesn't have to be anywhere close to similar to "real life" armor was, nor does it have to realistically cover the soft bits (on either sex) in order to afford the same amount of protection.

Shunravi

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Uriel_Nocturne wrote: »

1) Bewbs...

2) It's fine. This is a fantasy game set in a High Fantasy atmosphere. Armor, Weapons, none of it has to reflect modern physics or actually cover much of anything. When playing a game such as this, suspension of belief is quite necessary.

3) We're running around as Elves and Orcs, the armor doesn't have to be anywhere close to similar to "real life" armor was, nor does it have to realistically cover the soft bits (on either sex) in order to afford the same amount of protection.

An adendum to your last point, the game has magical warding, enchantments, glass armor (actually practical with modern glass), and physics altering projectile manipulation spells.

LadyNalcarya

KhajiitiLizard wrote: »

Where's the light and medium armor showing a bit of skin is fine... but heavy shouldn't option?

This.
But of course, even heavy models should be fitted to female characters, to avoid bloated torso issue. This doesnt mean making them skin-tight, just adjusting proportions.

Shunravi

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

KoshkaMurka wrote: »

KhajiitiLizard wrote: »

Where's the light and medium armor showing a bit of skin is fine... but heavy shouldn't option?

This.

Yup

urkonse

im not voting because every choice includes something i dont want vote...

female shall have armor designed for them , but i dont myself care what my armor looks like

Vangy

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Im still trying to figure out who these 7 people who picked option 3 are. Why all the boob hate =(

lolo_01b16_ESO

No boob plates, No skin showing. I want REAL armour that is practical.

I don't mind seeing some skin on silk or leather gear, but metall armour should for sure cover all skin, no matter weather you're male or female.

Faulgor

babylon wrote: »

How about an option to actually just HAVE female armour models.

Most armors in the game have female models. By which I mean they form-fit breasts.

MarrazzMist

No boob plates, No skin showing. I want REAL armour that is practical.

I prefer practical armour for my characters.

Though I'm mostly wearing new crime lord costume at the moment. I'm not even bothered with lack of breasts! I made them small anyway you can hardly see the difference.

Korah_Eaglecry

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

I voted for the first option even though its not exactly how I would of worded it. For me its a video game and I dont mind there being some skin showing or some questionable armor. Its far from the Japanese Anime type of Armors you might see. So for me its quite ludicrous for ZOS or anyone else to go above and beyond to cover everything up. Its a video game. Not church.

With that said. I dont mind Armor completely covering up females. What irks me is that the Armor distorts the proportions that Ive made in the Character Creation. If I look at my character and have a hard time recognizing them because visually they are distorted from what they were originally without the Armor. ZOS done ****ed up.

khele23eb17_ESO

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Ariisen wrote: »

As long as we actually have FEMALE MODELS I'm fine either way.

I like how the old armor looks on my girls but having some more realistic option isn't bad.

Its not realistic tho. Its weirdly misshapen.