Female armor models( Racial style poll!)

Vangy

With all the debate going on about how female armour looks etc, I thought Id make a poll to see where the community stands. Ill do my best to incorporate as many choices I can think off. Also do note, female characters should have female armour models and that isnt what this poll is about. Imo, female toons having female armour mesh isnt even up for debate.

Note: Option 1 falls in line with a choice. We can have realistic armor while boob plates/skin showing is fine also. (AKA choices are fine). Whereas option 2 is more along the lines of boob plates and skin showing shouldnt be in game.

babylon

How about an option to actually just HAVE female armour models.

Vangy

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

babylon wrote: »

How about an option to actually just HAVE female armour models.

^ That is something that does not require a poll IMO. Female characters SHOULD have female armour models.... I have no idea why zos is using male mesh for female toons. This poll is about the more specific things like boob plates etc. Female characters having female models shouldnt even be up for debate.... This isnt the 1900s..... But I will put that into the description so its clear.

babylon

Vangy wrote: »

babylon wrote: »

How about an option to actually just HAVE female armour models.

^ That is something that does not require a poll IMO. Female characters SHOULD have female armour models.... I have no idea why zos is using male mesh for female toons. This poll is about the more specific things like boob plates etc. Female characters having female models shouldnt even be up for debate.... This isnt the 1900s.....

Well the current situation about us not even getting female armour models needs more discussion....will worry about how it looks later.

Vangy

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

babylon wrote: »

Vangy wrote: »

babylon wrote: »

How about an option to actually just HAVE female armour models.

^ That is something that does not require a poll IMO. Female characters SHOULD have female armour models.... I have no idea why zos is using male mesh for female toons. This poll is about the more specific things like boob plates etc. Female characters having female models shouldnt even be up for debate.... This isnt the 1900s.....

Well the current situation about us not even getting female armour models needs more discussion....will worry about how it looks later.

True that. Ive put that into the description so its abundantly clear where I stand about female armour models.

KhajiitiLizard

Where's the light and medium armor showing a bit of skin is fine... but heavy shouldn't option?

Abeille

I would like to have an option like "We should have options for realistic and for non-realistic armors alike".

The "I don't care" option is not applicable because I DO CARE, I care for variety. If there is too much of any and none of the other, it is bad in my book.

I usually pick more realistic options when they are available and I don't like boob plates on MY characters, but I want the option to be there for people who like them.

Vangy

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Abeille wrote: »

I would like to have an option like "We should have options for realistic and for non-realistic armors alike".

The "I don't care" option is not applicable because I DO CARE, I care for variety. If there is too much of any and none of the other, it is bad in my book.

I usually pick more realistic options when they are available and I don't like boob plates on MY characters, but I want the option to be there for people who like them.

When i drafted up this poll, option 1 was along the lines of we can have boob plates and skin showing no problem. This also means that we dont have much to say about realistic armour. Whereas option 2 was that all boob plate armor is bad and shouldnt be allowed. So option 1 is a choice while option 2 is a flat out no. I should have made this clearer and im sorry!. Cant change the poll options now =( I did however incorporate your thoughts into the description.

KatzMainTank

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Variety is key. I'd rather have options for both "realistic" and "fantasy" variants across all armor types. As @Abeille stated, there should AND CAN BE ZoS...options for both sides.

Vangy

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

KhajiitiLizard wrote: »

Where's the light and medium armor showing a bit of skin is fine... but heavy shouldn't option?

This also falls in line with option 1. Aka a choice.

ie: Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

So some armours/styles can have boob plates or skin showing while others can have full covered up (male body type) armours.

dday3six

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

I could never get on board with realistic armor if the weapons are going to be completely lacking in practicality. Staves being magic are one thing, but most of the swords, daggers, axes and bows would have terrible function in combat. They're too heavy, oddly balanced and/or shaped, too thick, too long, and so on. From a fantasy aspect they are fine, but once injected with dose of realism they're completely impractical.

JamieAubrey

I don't really care as I'm always looking at the back

Vangy

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

JamieAubrey wrote: »

I don't really care as I'm always looking at the back

Would u like to have butt-plate armours then?

Miszou

Speaking as a lusty Argonian maid, I prefer a nice bit of tail.

Ra'Shtar

Boobs are offensive and should be destroyed at all costs. (This option is here because I noticed my breton sorc boobs became 20% smaller after IC. Im NOT wearing a tin foil hat. Obviously this is a troll option for all you trolls to pick (; )

lol i found this option hilarious.

Gidorick

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

I want my "fantasy game" set in a "fantasy world" to have "fantastical armor" for both male and female characters.

Inarre

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Boob plates are all the rage!

Well. Im down for sexy armor as long as it isnt a threat. Lets be sexy AND practical, yes?

phaneub17_ESO

Boobs are offensive and should be destroyed at all costs. (This option is here because I noticed my breton sorc boobs became 20% smaller after IC. Im NOT wearing a tin foil hat. Obviously this is a troll option for all you trolls to pick (; )

The button looked shiny... and I don't really care what they do with future armor models, its their game.

Vangy

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Im still waiting to hear arguments from the people who voted no to tell us why they feel that boob plates should be obliterated from this game.

Im fine with giving everyone a choice;

KatzMainTank wrote: »

Variety is key. I'd rather have options for both "realistic" and "fantasy" variants across all armor types. As @Abeille stated, there should AND CAN BE ZoS...options for both sides.

But I cannot fathom why we would have to restrict any kind of revealing armor completely. As long as;

Inarre wrote: »

Boob plates are all the rage!

Well. Im down for sexy armor as long as it isnt a threat. Lets be sexy AND practical, yes?

I dont want korean mmo style bikini armor but I think in a fantasy game, a little side boob or thighs showing is pretty sexy. Hell, I want some male armours that show off a little arm/midriff sexy abs etc.

MornaBaine

I actually want BOTH "smexy" armor choices AND realistic armor choices. Most of all....I want armor made FOR female characters instead of just turning them into deformed boys!

Vangy

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

MornaBaine wrote: »

I actually want BOTH "smexy" armor choices AND realistic armor choices. Most of all....I want armor made FOR female characters instead of just turning them into deformed boys!

I totally agree with this and this was the point of the poll in the first place. Not using female character mesh for female armour is just ZOS being ridiculous....

Pepsi2853_ESO

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

hey most people are on my side

Katahdin

I didnt vote because I didnt like the way the choices were worded.

I want my characters to look normal with the proper shaped anatomy.
I like variety and choice in armor, however I dont care for super skimpy armor. I do prefer practical and realistic armor. However, sexy armor that shows off the character's figure in a tasteful way is fine.

Vangy

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Katahdin wrote: »

I didnt vote because I didnt like the way the choices were worded.

I want my characters to look normal with the proper shaped anatomy.
I like variety and choice in armor, however I dont care for super skimpy armor. I do prefer practical and realistic armor. However, sexy armor that shows off the character's figure in a tasteful way is fine.

Well I cant please everyone but I still am glad that you chose to share your POV which is what's important.

NewBlacksmurf

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

babylon wrote: »

How about an option to actually just HAVE female armour models.

This with some body updates. I mean why not. As ZOS is charging $39 a pop for assistants so can we at least get some assistance on our character models?

menedhyn

While i'm not a fan of high fantasy armour (yawn) or super skimpy, oversexualised stuff, I would like the choice for more plain, functional equipment for those who prefer this look. There is scope for both types. Variety is good.

Pepsi2853_ESO

Revealing armour with boob plates/skin showing is fine. I think its sexy in a totally non-perv way.

Vangy wrote: »

JamieAubrey wrote: »

I don't really care as I'm always looking at the back

Would u like to have butt-plate armours then?

THIS.

Yinmaigao

Boobs are offensive and should be destroyed at all costs. (This option is here because I noticed my breton sorc boobs became 20% smaller after IC. Im NOT wearing a tin foil hat. Obviously this is a troll option for all you trolls to pick (; )

Well played.

Hortator Indoril Nerevar

No boob plates, No skin showing. I want REAL armour that is practical.

Vangy wrote: »

With all the debate going on about how female armour looks etc, I thought Id make a poll to see where the community stands. Ill do my best to incorporate as many choices I can think off. Also do note, female characters should have female armour models and that isnt what this poll is about. Imo, female toons having female armour mesh isnt even up for debate.

Note: Option 1 falls in line with a choice. We can have realistic armor while boob plates/skin showing is fine also. (AKA choices are fine). Whereas option 2 is more along the lines of boob plates and skin showing shouldnt be in game.

Ill stop playing if this turns into a stupid Asian art style game.. Want to perv on something go use google..

Hortator Indoril Nerevar

No boob plates, No skin showing. I want REAL armour that is practical.

Real female armor.



Want to see something else then I suggest you google it.

SirAndy

Vangy wrote: »

Female armor models( Racial style poll!)

Last time i checked, "Female" was not a race ...


PS: Also, you're missing the "I'm totally a perv" option in your poll