Magicka NB, stam NB, and magicka sorc
Magicka NB, stam NB, and magicka sorc
joshdm2001_ESO wrote: »Magicka NB, stam NB, and magicka sorc
Huh? What about Stam sorc? Isn't that what you, king Richard, and methuselah, and other popular players play? Why would you omit one of the most op builds out there? All you guys do is bolt, wb, bolt, wb, bolt, wb. Lol your so biased it hurts. I watch your stream. All you do is rage about nb ambush because it's the only class combo that can actually stop your wb bolt nonsense.
joshdm2001_ESO wrote: »I thought 1.7 was suppose to balance pvp damage. I thought everyone's damage was reduced. Why are people still bonking me on the head with an animation canceled wrecking blow for 10k while in combat. Yesterday, no kidding, the guy hit me in mid air halfway through my ambush. As I lept forward his wb took precedence over my ambush. This skill has got to be the cheesest skill in the game.
Totalitarian wrote: »Nightblades of Magicka or Stamina are considered good.
Sorcerers of Magicka or Stamina are considered good.
Stamina Dragonknights are considered really strong once they close the gap, but Magicka Dragonknights are considered a bit gimped in PVP.
Stamplars are also considered a bit weak. Also, Magicka Templars are a bit weak, but they are good healers, so that's good for AP generation.
Totalitarian wrote: »Nightblades of Magicka or Stamina are considered good.
Sorcerers of Magicka or Stamina are considered good.
Stamina Dragonknights are considered really strong once they close the gap, but Magicka Dragonknights are considered a bit gimped in PVP.
Stamplars are also considered a bit weak. Also, Magicka Templars are a bit weak, but they are good healers, so that's good for AP generation.
joshdm2001_ESO wrote: »Magicka NB, stam NB, and magicka sorc
Huh? What about Stam sorc? Isn't that what you, king Richard, and methuselah, and other popular players play? Why would you omit one of the most op builds out there? All you guys do is bolt, wb, bolt, wb, bolt, wb. Lol your so biased it hurts. I watch your stream. All you do is rage about nb ambush because it's the only class combo that can actually stop your wb bolt nonsense.
joshdm2001_ESO wrote: »Magicka NB, stam NB, and magicka sorc
Huh? What about Stam sorc? Isn't that what you, king Richard, and methuselah, and other popular players play? Why would you omit one of the most op builds out there? All you guys do is bolt, wb, bolt, wb, bolt, wb. Lol your so biased it hurts. I watch your stream. All you do is rage about nb ambush because it's the only class combo that can actually stop your wb bolt nonsense.
Stam sorc is not op. Stam is just better than Magicka because CP favors Magic defense over Physical defense.
.....And Vigor.
joshdm2001_ESO wrote: »Magicka NB, stam NB, and magicka sorc
Huh? What about Stam sorc? Isn't that what you, king Richard, and methuselah, and other popular players play? Why would you omit one of the most op builds out there? All you guys do is bolt, wb, bolt, wb, bolt, wb. Lol your so biased it hurts. I watch your stream. All you do is rage about nb ambush because it's the only class combo that can actually stop your wb bolt nonsense.
Stam sorc is not op. Stam is just better than Magicka because CP favors Magic defense over Physical defense.
.....And Vigor.
They could add 100% physical resist to CP tree and it wont impact magicka sorcs because theyre running shields. This is more relevant for other magicka users like templars, NB, and DK... magicka sorcs - not really.
Stam sorcs pro over magicka sorc is their stam pool for dealing with CCs and their mobility. Their mobility is destroyed by gap closer bugs though this patch. But that goes for everyone - it was just a leading strength of stam sorc.
Magicka sorc will still trump a stam sorc 1 on 1.
joshdm2001_ESO wrote: »Magicka NB, stam NB, and magicka sorc
Huh? What about Stam sorc? Isn't that what you, king Richard, and methuselah, and other popular players play? Why would you omit one of the most op builds out there? All you guys do is bolt, wb, bolt, wb, bolt, wb. Lol your so biased it hurts. I watch your stream. All you do is rage about nb ambush because it's the only class combo that can actually stop your wb bolt nonsense.
Stam sorc is not op. Stam is just better than Magicka because CP favors Magic defense over Physical defense.
.....And Vigor.
They could add 100% physical resist to CP tree and it wont impact magicka sorcs because theyre running shields. This is more relevant for other magicka users like templars, NB, and DK... magicka sorcs - not really.
Stam sorcs pro over magicka sorc is their stam pool for dealing with CCs and their mobility. Their mobility is destroyed by gap closer bugs though this patch. But that goes for everyone - it was just a leading strength of stam sorc.
Magicka sorc will still trump a stam sorc 1 on 1.
Well, no. what i meant was Stamina hits harder than Magicka. That's not to say Magicka loses in all aspects over Stamina, Magicka at least does not have Dodge roll, Break free and offense tied to one resource pool.
joshdm2001_ESO wrote: »Magicka NB, stam NB, and magicka sorc
Huh? What about Stam sorc? Isn't that what you, king Richard, and methuselah, and other popular players play? Why would you omit one of the most op builds out there? All you guys do is bolt, wb, bolt, wb, bolt, wb. Lol your so biased it hurts. I watch your stream. All you do is rage about nb ambush because it's the only class combo that can actually stop your wb bolt nonsense.
Joy_Division wrote: »
Stam Templars need a bit of love...