My theory is the scrolls weren't created, and that's the significance behind the scroll cylinder. Unopened, it doesn't have a real beginning or a real ending. It just circles for infinity into the past and future.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Michael Kirkbride ! :-)
No. Just no. Fan fiction isn't lore.
lordrichter wrote: »GuyNamedSean wrote: »I always assumed that, considering the scrolls do not obey time properly as everything else does
This is the key. From our perspective, the Elder Scrolls might as well have created themselves. There is no such thing as a time before the Elder Scrolls.
From their perspective, they just are. There is no time involved. They simply exist.
lordrichter wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Michael Kirkbride ! :-)
No. Just no. Fan fiction isn't lore.
Actually, this is one game world where fan fiction can be just as much a part of the lore as what appears in the games. If the fan fiction is well written as an historical or academic account, is internally consistent and thought out, and fits into existing canon lore, there is no reason to discount it. At least, not on the basis of it being fan fiction.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Actually no, there *are* scrolls within the cylinders, and they can be read - at your own risk, because they make you blind.
No he didn't, he didn't join until Morrowind and then he rage quit and left.anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Michael Kirkbride ! :-)
Doflamingo wrote: »Even though the Elder Scrolls series began since very long ago, if i am not wrong Skyrim was the first time that we saw and touched an acctual Elder Scroll and still everyone was saying that their origins are unknown and they existed forever. The only guess i can make is that Akatosh made them in case the Daedric Princes ally together and try to battle against the Divines and also because there isnt anyone higher in power than Akatosh
lordrichter wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Michael Kirkbride ! :-)
No. Just no. Fan fiction isn't lore.
Actually, this is one game world where fan fiction can be just as much a part of the lore as what appears in the games. If the fan fiction is well written as an historical or academic account, is internally consistent and thought out, and fits into existing canon lore, there is no reason to discount it. At least, not on the basis of it being fan fiction.
I don't see how. You can create theories about the lore and such, but creating some terrible fan fiction that doesn't fit the world one iota (And basically destroy's the world itself in the same breath) should not be counted as canon lore just because one guy worked on an early game before the series became popular.
Sithisvoid wrote: »The current loremaster is one of the reasons I decided to try ESO he made some awesome modules for D and D way back in the day. Michael Kirkbride is probably alright But I would say Lawrence Shick trumps him in the RPG world.
Oblivion was the first game to feature an actual Elder Scroll
When you had to steal of during the Thieves Guild questline
lordrichter wrote: »GuyNamedSean wrote: »I always assumed that, considering the scrolls do not obey time properly as everything else does
This is the key. From our perspective, the Elder Scrolls might as well have created themselves. There is no such thing as a time before the Elder Scrolls.
From their perspective, they just are. There is no time involved. They simply exist.
lordrichter wrote: »GuyNamedSean wrote: »I always assumed that, considering the scrolls do not obey time properly as everything else does
This is the key. From our perspective, the Elder Scrolls might as well have created themselves. There is no such thing as a time before the Elder Scrolls.
From their perspective, they just are. There is no time involved. They simply exist.
And of course the REALLY important question is...
Who wrote the Younger Scrolls, and where are they now?