Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
MaxwellCrystal wrote: »The title may have given you the impression that this post would be an "Thanks for all you've done ZoS" appreciation forum but unfortunately it is not.
I do appreciate things ZoS has done in the past and promises to do in the future but the things they've done bad far out weighs the good.
This post is just another typical compliant/rant forum like the many others but this compliant extends to the campaign changes in how you obtain points and leader board rankings.
The campaign on Xbox One had just reset, I have the day off from work, no college home work as I've finished it over night. I'm a morning person so I'm all set, while the reset took place I was capturing keeps,resources,killing players and NPCs alike.
Here comes the compliant.
I captured over 6 different keeps all resources (by myself but I tagged along with a group). I wasn't in a actual group just followed them around and helped them complete things I couldn't do alone. The point is that I received little to nothing for all my work, I was ranked 29 with 75 points on the leader board after 4 keeps captured with resources . At that point I was like oh ok it must be a glitch there's no way I received so little points for all my work that I put out, unfortunately that wasn't the case.
The person who is currently ranked 1 told me he was in IC the entire time, THE ENTIRE TIME. He didn't help capture keeps, resources, repair walls, kill Players guarding the keep, or help the elder scroll get back. He accomplished none of that yet he was ranked #1.
Please ZoS tell me how is this a fair way of ranking players on the leader-board; especially when it determines who will be crowned emperor if all keeps are captured. I'm a Vet 16 Stam DK who knows his rotations pretty damn well yet you reward effort with nothing.
Feel free to discuss and flame me with every reason in the book you have but this is beyond ridiculousness
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
The guy who slaughters the most enemies is always elected emperor.
Are you suggesting that he who PvDoors the map should be crowned instead?
Why reward the PvE aspect of Cyrodiil more than the PvP aspect for which it was designed. The only thing that is "False" is your understanding on what should be considered worthwhile actions in the zone.
We already have people who have farmed emperor by repairing resource towers and walls. We don't need more of those.
If you want Emperor, get out there and *kill* people.
I do think they could award bonus AP for kills that occur in keeps and resources over the freaking sewers in IC. That could help shift more PvP in the places for which it is designed.
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
The guy who slaughters the most enemies is always elected emperor.
Are you suggesting that he who PvDoors the map should be crowned instead?
Why reward the PvE aspect of Cyrodiil more than the PvP aspect for which it was designed. The only thing that is "False" is your understanding on what should be considered worthwhile actions in the zone.
We already have people who have farmed emperor by repairing resource towers and walls. We don't need more of those.
If you want Emperor, get out there and *kill* people.
I do think they could award bonus AP for kills that occur in keeps and resources over the freaking sewers in IC. That could help shift more PvP in the places for which it is designed.
MaxwellCrystal wrote: »@Ezareth
If this is the case then there is no need for Cyrodiil they might as well make IC and Cyrodiil separate or just make a separate server where IC is inaccessible and you can only do PvP in Cyrodiil.
All your statement says to me is that players who puts forth effort shouldn't get nothing while those who just sit around PvPing in a small PvE/PvP area should be awarded even though their contribution to the war is literally 0%
After said player was Ranked #1 I went in IC and spawn camped EP while AP came in droves, I went from being ranked 29 (After capturing keeps, resources, repairing walls, taking scrolls) to being ranked #3. If you can't see the horrible gap and inequality in the amount of effort put forth to the campaign that dictates that an emperor can only be crowned when all imperial keeps are taken by one alliance then by all means you miss the concept of cyrodiil at its foundation mate.
I find it funny how you also said PvDoor, first on foremost like I stated above becoming emperor is decided when your alliance controls all imperial keeps.
So you support this concept that a player who puts forth 0 effort to capturing keeps which are needed in order to become emperor, should be crowned emperor. I love that kind of logic, those who work gets nothing but a pat on the back while those who sit back and spawn kill gets all the rewards.
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
MaxwellCrystal wrote: »@Ezareth
If this is the case then there is no need for Cyrodiil they might as well make IC and Cyrodiil separate or just make a separate server where IC is inaccessible and you can only do PvP in Cyrodiil.
All your statement says to me is that players who puts forth effort shouldn't get nothing while those who just sit around PvPing in a small PvE/PvP area should be awarded even though their contribution to the war is literally 0%
After said player was Ranked #1 I went in IC and spawn camped EP while AP came in droves, I went from being ranked 29 (After capturing keeps, resources, repairing walls, taking scrolls) to being ranked #3. If you can't see the horrible gap and inequality in the amount of effort put forth to the campaign that dictates that an emperor can only be crowned when all imperial keeps are taken by one alliance then by all means you miss the concept of cyrodiil at its foundation mate.
I find it funny how you also said PvDoor, first on foremost like I stated above becoming emperor is decided when your alliance controls all imperial keeps.
So you support this concept that a player who puts forth 0 effort to capturing keeps which are needed in order to become emperor, should be crowned emperor. I love that kind of logic, those who work gets nothing but a pat on the back while those who sit back and spawn kill gets all the rewards.
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
MaxwellCrystal wrote: »@Xeven I know getting kills is where it's at but that's not all there is when it comes to becoming emperor, I'm sorry but kills alone don't get you emperorship it's the keeps. Post IC I've seen many players who became emperor and it was because they were at every battle.
I would be storming a keep, while slaughtering the opposition and see the ranked #1 person doing the same thing just in order to get that imperial keep.
At this point now IC has just undermined Cyrodiil's objective which was getting scrolls,taking keeps, and killing players.
MaxwellCrystal wrote: »@Suru If that's the case then make it so only those who contribute to the war in Cyrodiil becomes emperor. There are plenty of competent players who capture keeps and kill players outside of IC who deserve to become emperor not someone who doesn't lift a finger and spawn camps with a zerg.
Not being arrogant but I'm a decent player and I've taken on my fair share of 1 v x all the time as a declawed DK but I still followed the objective in attempts to gain the throne. Anyone can spam an AoE while a zerg of DC attacks another zerg or EP or AD, you'll still get credit for it too.
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
You have two former emperors in this thread telling you what they did. You can choose to do whatever you want, but I will tell you this. If your faction takes the ring, they will do it with or without you. If you want Emp, you get AP, and thats all you need to worry about.
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
MaxwellCrystal wrote: »
You have two former emperors in this thread telling you what they did. You can choose to do whatever you want, but I will tell you this. If your faction takes the ring, they will do it with or without you. If you want Emp, you get AP, and thats all you need to worry about.
I get your advice but I'm simply just explaining/ranting my opinion on how things should work when it comes to becoming emperor. It's not like I'm struggling to do so, I'm just stating that I feel that cyrodiil is pretty much useless. You would rely on someone to capture the keeps while you play solo and kill players in IC which aren't in Cyrodiil defending or attacking your keeps.
That to me is wrong since becoming emperor in cyrodiil has nothing to do with IC as being IC contributes 0% to what's going on in cyrodiil unless you take into account players getting annoyed with spawn killing and decide to go to cyrodiil for a change of pace as being a factor.
MaxwellCrystal wrote: »@Ezareth I don't join groups but DC spawns around me so I do get the maximum AP/ points (depending on my damage output). I'm just stating that anyone can rush into a bunch of AD/EP and drop AoE ults and spam AoEs while the zerg of your alliance who spawned behind you assists you which grants you maximum points.
I will agree with you there. They should give far more ap for seiging. Even then I dont know any hardcore PvPers that will do it unless they are trying to crown their friend.
Seiging sux. It's boring and a waste of AP.
Publius_Scipio wrote: »As emperor FENGRUSH would cut taxes 20% across the board. Bring jobs back to Glenumbra and Wayrest. Deport all Khajiit, Argonians, and Dremora and then have them immigrate back under a new system if they so choose. A focus on rebuilding outdated and crumbling infrastructure all over Cyrodiil and Imperial City. Build a new high-speed train from Craglorn to Auridon. Double-down on education (especially for wood elves). Have the OFFICIAL FENGRUSH TWITCH CHANNEL on FREE TV all over Tamriel.
Now that is effort.
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
Maybe not AP but they should incentivise it somehow. Im tired of seeing all the keeps owned by the same faction, including my own, but I'm certainly not going to bust out my trebuchet. I'll just go to IC or PvE or something else.
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell