Thrasher91604 wrote: »Wow. I guess the technology really is bad and flakey. There's no good technical reason for it. This may be my first and last MMO once I finish with the main story. Too bad.
I'd rather play reliable single player than this.
Thrasher91604 wrote: »I have to say that Witcher 3 was must less of a pain in the ass than this game. And it is MUCH newer. This game is how many years old now, and they are still having serious problems with reliability and performance?
Plus I could control which patches are applied or not. This is a mess. Hell network service outages halfway across the country broke this game. You'd think they'd bother to have redundant services after how many years?
Thrasher91604 wrote: »Just saying if it were properly designed and not buggy, this shouldn't happen.
Imagine what would happen to our financial systems if this were to happen.
Oops we lost your money. Too bad.
There would be a legal doodoo storm.
I've seen many games compared to TW3 in many different aspects, but this has got to be the most pointless one. Are you seriously saying that ESO should require less maintenance because a significantly smaller offline game doesn't need any? [snip]Thrasher91604 wrote: »I have to say that Witcher 3 was must less of a pain in the ass than this game. And it is MUCH newer. This game is how many years old now, and they are still having serious problems with reliability and performance?
Thrasher91604 wrote: »There's no excuse for poor software. [snip]
Thrasher91604 wrote: »
I sincerily hope the Creative Director has more important things to do than moderate forum posts. There's a report button in the bottom right corner of every post, feel free to use it.@ZOS_GinaBruno @ZOS_RichLambert Can one of you deal with this post please. It's getting out of hand thanks!
What MMO games have servers with no maintenance? Are they enjoyable? Is the user experience better than the ones with weekly maintenance?Thrasher91604 wrote: »[snip]