Maintenance for the week of May 18:
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – May 18, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – May 18, 8:00 UTC (4:00AM EDT) - 13:00 UTC (9:00AM EDT)
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – May 18, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – May 18, 8:00 UTC (4:00AM EDT) - 13:00 UTC (9:00AM EDT)
Should they add a non-PC player Campaign?
LoreRiley
✭✭✭✭
The amount of CPs they have is ridiculous. This doesn't mean I want a non-CP campaign.
Edited by LoreRiley on July 28, 2015 3:41PM Should they add a non-PC player Campaign? 57 votes
Yes
42%
24 votes
No
57%
33 votes
0
-
Reverb✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭If they exclude PC transfers as you suggest, you'll just get wiped by other console players who hit v14 and started grinding CP very quickly after console launch.Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you. ~Friedrich Nietzsche5 -
BBSooner✭✭✭✭✭
✭I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?2 -
Tors✭✭✭✭✭Its not CP thats beating youBetter late Than Pregnant....
The shadow cabinet, a group of people who pretend to have jobs they do not actually have
EU PC - Azura's Star
Decimation Elite - Raid Jester13 -
Stalwart385✭✭✭✭What would be the point of a campaign with only NPC's in it...
I kid. I think that is pretty harsh though. A non-CP campaign would be the best option, though I don't think that is the real issue. Console players will catch up eventually. Find a vet PC player in your alliance and get them to teach you the ins and outs.Edited by Stalwart385 on July 28, 2015 3:53PM0 -
TequilaFire✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭This is alliance vs alliance not 1 v 1 so your group will have a mix of skills to even out who you are fighting against.
Edited by TequilaFire on July 28, 2015 3:52PM1 -
TequilaFire✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭deleted double lag monster postEdited by TequilaFire on July 28, 2015 6:16PM0 -
EskimoBrother✭✭✭I think a no CP campaign would be better for this sort of thing, and yes CPs do make a huge difference.
-Clayton Bigsby
-EskimoBrother
YogurtSlingerFC1 -
LoreRiley✭✭✭✭I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?
I understand but its really hard when there is an emperor with hundreds and hundreds of CP in Resistance and Critical0 -
LoreRiley✭✭✭✭Stalwart385 wrote: »What would be the point of a campaign with only NPC's in it...
I kid. I think that is pretty harsh though. A non-CP campaign would be the best option, though I don't think that is the real issue. Console players will catch up eventually. Find a vet PC player in your alliance and get them to teach you the ins and outs.
I have a PC friend of let me use his account....and the advantage I had was insane. I was wiping out groups while my NB with only 10cps could barely kill a lvl 40 DK0 -
MCMancub✭✭✭✭I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?
I understand but its really hard when there is an emperor with hundreds and hundreds of CP in Resistance and Critical
This is an incredibly misguided thread and you should feel a little silly for making it. You've just confirmed that this is about CP, not PC transfers. So what you're saying is all PC transfers are emperors with "hundreds and hundreds" of CP?0 -
starkerealm✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?
I understand but its really hard when there is an emperor with hundreds and hundreds of CP in Resistance and Critical
Yeah... so, that's actually not possible. Because you can't put more than 100 points into a star. Seriously. They cap.
Also, you need to be CR298 before you can max a single star... at which point you're literally only buffing one thing in that entire tree. Also, that's specifically for Warriors. For Mage and Thief you need to be 299 and 300.
Also, resistance caps at +25% IIRC. So you can get a bonus that's weaker than two pieces of Gold, Nirnhoned gear... So, while that's a real modifier, it's not "ohgodwhyisheeatingmyface" range.Edited by starkerealm on July 28, 2015 4:01PM1 -
P3ZZL3✭✭✭✭✭
✭This was mentioned way before console launched and it was a tricky place for @ZOS to be in. The had promised the transfer way before the inception of the CP system. They didn't allow for the speed at which some would grind, hence the constant nerfs to areas.
I for one see absolutely no issue if there was 1 (ONE) campaign, that people COULD OR COULD NOT join, based on 30 days that did not have CP's.
I genuinely see no reason not to add it *shrugs*CP561 Redguard | Jabsy Templar | Stamina Build
CP561 Breton | Jesus Beam Templar | Magicka Build Forever!
CP561 Naked Nord | Tanky DK | Stamigicka Build
✭✭✭ Check ESO Server Status Live!: http://eso.webhub.eu/ ✭✭✭0 -
LoreRiley✭✭✭✭I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?
I understand but its really hard when there is an emperor with hundreds and hundreds of CP in Resistance and Critical
This is an incredibly misguided thread and you should feel a little silly for making it. You've just confirmed that this is about CP, not PC transfers. So what you're saying is all PC transfers are emperors with "hundreds and hundreds" of CP?
PC players had alot more time to grind cp but through further consideration I do find a non-cp eould work best.0 -
MCMancub✭✭✭✭I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?
I understand but its really hard when there is an emperor with hundreds and hundreds of CP in Resistance and Critical
This is an incredibly misguided thread and you should feel a little silly for making it. You've just confirmed that this is about CP, not PC transfers. So what you're saying is all PC transfers are emperors with "hundreds and hundreds" of CP?
PC players had alot more time to grind cp but through further consideration I do find a non-cp eould work best.
You're still not getting it. You don't have to have tons of CP, or even be veteran ranked, to have transferred to console! You could be level 3 and transfer over, and you're calling for a campaign that bars these people based on a mechanic that isn't the reason you're losing so much.
This thread is ridiculously off base.3 -
LoreRiley✭✭✭✭starkerealm wrote: »I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?
I understand but its really hard when there is an emperor with hundreds and hundreds of CP in Resistance and Critical
Yeah... so, that's actually not possible. Because you can't put more than 100 points into a star. Seriously. They cap.
Also, you need to be CR298 before you can max a single star... at which point you're literally only buffing one thing in that entire tree. Also, that's specifically for Warriors. For Mage and Thief you need to be 299 and 300.
Also, resistance caps at +25% IIRC. So you can get a bonus that's weaker than two pieces of Gold, Nirnhoned gear... So, while that's a real modifier, it's not "ohgodwhyisheeatingmyface" range.
There are different resistance perks I'm talking about about like elemental,physical,critical,spell.0 -
LoreRiley✭✭✭✭I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?
I understand but its really hard when there is an emperor with hundreds and hundreds of CP in Resistance and Critical
This is an incredibly misguided thread and you should feel a little silly for making it. You've just confirmed that this is about CP, not PC transfers. So what you're saying is all PC transfers are emperors with "hundreds and hundreds" of CP?
PC players had alot more time to grind cp but through further consideration I do find a non-cp eould work best.
You're still not getting it. You don't have to have tons of CP, or even be veteran ranked, to have transferred to console! You could be level 3 and transfer over, and you're calling for a campaign that bars these people based on a mechanic that isn't the reason you're losing so much.
This thread is ridiculously off base.
Thats why I said I thinl a Non-cp would be better0 -
MCMancub✭✭✭✭I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?
I understand but its really hard when there is an emperor with hundreds and hundreds of CP in Resistance and Critical
This is an incredibly misguided thread and you should feel a little silly for making it. You've just confirmed that this is about CP, not PC transfers. So what you're saying is all PC transfers are emperors with "hundreds and hundreds" of CP?
PC players had alot more time to grind cp but through further consideration I do find a non-cp eould work best.
You're still not getting it. You don't have to have tons of CP, or even be veteran ranked, to have transferred to console! You could be level 3 and transfer over, and you're calling for a campaign that bars these people based on a mechanic that isn't the reason you're losing so much.
This thread is ridiculously off base.
Thats why I said I thinl a Non-cp would be betterThe amount of CPs they have is ridiculous. This doesn't mean I want a non-CP campaign.
Did you just forget that I can scroll up?1 -
LoreRiley✭✭✭✭I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?
I understand but its really hard when there is an emperor with hundreds and hundreds of CP in Resistance and Critical
This is an incredibly misguided thread and you should feel a little silly for making it. You've just confirmed that this is about CP, not PC transfers. So what you're saying is all PC transfers are emperors with "hundreds and hundreds" of CP?
PC players had alot more time to grind cp but through further consideration I do find a non-cp eould work best.I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?
I understand but its really hard when there is an emperor with hundreds and hundreds of CP in Resistance and Critical
This is an incredibly misguided thread and you should feel a little silly for making it. You've just confirmed that this is about CP, not PC transfers. So what you're saying is all PC transfers are emperors with "hundreds and hundreds" of CP?
PC players had alot more time to grind cp but through further consideration I do find a non-cp eould work best.
You're still not getting it. You don't have to have tons of CP, or even be veteran ranked, to have transferred to console! You could be level 3 and transfer over, and you're calling for a campaign that bars these people based on a mechanic that isn't the reason you're losing so much.
This thread is ridiculously off base.
Thats why I said I thinl a Non-cp would be betterThe amount of CPs they have is ridiculous. This doesn't mean I want a non-CP campaign.
Did you just forget that I can scroll up?
I can scroll up too0 -
Akavir_Sentinel✭✭✭✭✭
✭Non-veteran campaigns with Champion Points disabled, and veteran campaigns with Champion Points disabled. Simple solution. Even so, you still won't be on even footing with players that have been playing for over a year and have endgame gear and skills.2 -
MCMancub✭✭✭✭I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?
I understand but its really hard when there is an emperor with hundreds and hundreds of CP in Resistance and Critical
This is an incredibly misguided thread and you should feel a little silly for making it. You've just confirmed that this is about CP, not PC transfers. So what you're saying is all PC transfers are emperors with "hundreds and hundreds" of CP?
PC players had alot more time to grind cp but through further consideration I do find a non-cp eould work best.I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?
I understand but its really hard when there is an emperor with hundreds and hundreds of CP in Resistance and Critical
This is an incredibly misguided thread and you should feel a little silly for making it. You've just confirmed that this is about CP, not PC transfers. So what you're saying is all PC transfers are emperors with "hundreds and hundreds" of CP?
PC players had alot more time to grind cp but through further consideration I do find a non-cp eould work best.
You're still not getting it. You don't have to have tons of CP, or even be veteran ranked, to have transferred to console! You could be level 3 and transfer over, and you're calling for a campaign that bars these people based on a mechanic that isn't the reason you're losing so much.
This thread is ridiculously off base.
Thats why I said I thinl a Non-cp would be betterThe amount of CPs they have is ridiculous. This doesn't mean I want a non-CP campaign.
Did you just forget that I can scroll up?
I can scroll up too
So you flipped your decision after you were called out for this being a misguided thread. Good for you.0 -
P3ZZL3✭✭✭✭✭
✭I scrolled down and found nothing
CP561 Redguard | Jabsy Templar | Stamina Build
CP561 Breton | Jesus Beam Templar | Magicka Build Forever!
CP561 Naked Nord | Tanky DK | Stamigicka Build
✭✭✭ Check ESO Server Status Live!: http://eso.webhub.eu/ ✭✭✭0 -
LoreRiley✭✭✭✭I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?
I understand but its really hard when there is an emperor with hundreds and hundreds of CP in Resistance and Critical
This is an incredibly misguided thread and you should feel a little silly for making it. You've just confirmed that this is about CP, not PC transfers. So what you're saying is all PC transfers are emperors with "hundreds and hundreds" of CP?
PC players had alot more time to grind cp but through further consideration I do find a non-cp eould work best.I had to re-read your post a few times, I'm guessing you want a campaign on the console servers that don't allow PC transfers to play in them because some may have high CP counts?
I disagree. It's all one population now. How would it benefit ZOS to segregate their population when it is already likely to be the vast minority?
I understand but its really hard when there is an emperor with hundreds and hundreds of CP in Resistance and Critical
This is an incredibly misguided thread and you should feel a little silly for making it. You've just confirmed that this is about CP, not PC transfers. So what you're saying is all PC transfers are emperors with "hundreds and hundreds" of CP?
PC players had alot more time to grind cp but through further consideration I do find a non-cp eould work best.
You're still not getting it. You don't have to have tons of CP, or even be veteran ranked, to have transferred to console! You could be level 3 and transfer over, and you're calling for a campaign that bars these people based on a mechanic that isn't the reason you're losing so much.
This thread is ridiculously off base.
Thats why I said I thinl a Non-cp would be betterThe amount of CPs they have is ridiculous. This doesn't mean I want a non-CP campaign.
Did you just forget that I can scroll up?
I can scroll up too
So you flipped your decision after you were called out for this being a misguided thread. Good for you.
I admit I didn't fully think it through. It was more towards those high VRs with tons of CP0 -
dafox187✭✭✭i try to restrain myself from calling people peasants don't make it harder for me please
don't get mad at my spelling, autocorrect doesn't cover fantasy.
Why couldn't the Khajiit go to the party? She had to be Elsweyr.2 -
TequilaFire✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭These threads do nothing but stir up trouble.
Just invite the PC players to your group - problem solved.0 -
LoreRiley✭✭✭✭i try to restrain myself from calling people peasants don't make it harder for me please
Call me a peasant? For not wanting to sit in front of a computer in a secluded area by myself for hours a day? Yeah Im a peasant because I actually have friends who come over and would like to game with me aswell.0 -
Enodoc✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭What you want is a no CP campaign, not a no PC campaign.UESP: The Unofficial Elder Scrolls Pages - A collaborative source for all knowledge on the Elder Scrolls series since 1995
Join us on Discord - discord.gg/uesp2 -
Thymos✭✭✭✭✭So you don't want PC players to have a certain campaign? What the heck does that matter?The Older Gamers Recruitment Thread
Always accepting new members for NA and EU server. PvP PvE RP all welcome. Must be 25+ yo to join.
http://www.theoldergamers.com/1
