Have you seriously not seen the explanation of everyone being the Vestige @Yinmaigao?
Doesn't mean I like our appreciate it for "my immersion".
Anyways, this is getting a little off topic. Just want to say that immersion is cool, but not at others expense.
Have you seriously not seen the explanation of everyone being the Vestige @Yinmaigao?
Doesn't mean I like our appreciate it for "my immersion".
Anyways, this is getting a little off topic. Just want to say that immersion is cool, but not at others expense.
How would this be at anyone's expense. You wouldn't even know if someone had this toggled.
I find myself dreading the impending addition of the frost horse. I wanted to make a post imploring ZOS not to aff the horse, to maintain the integrity of the atmosphere, but I knew that plea would be in vain. ZOS stands to make money from these Mystical Mounts, so suggesting they not be released is entirely unrealistic. Instead, I'm suggesting something different.
I will more than likely never buy any of the mystical mounts that ZOS will releases. I have no interest in fire, ice, skelton, lava, wood, lightning, or whatever type of mystical or elemental mounts they come up with. I do, however, have an active interest in not seeing these mounts. To me they are almost as bad add if we had glitter unicorns with trailing rainbows. Not quite as bad, but close.
The point is? As silly as this sounds, they directly negatively impact my playing experience. So, I would like a purchasable Mystical Mounts Ignore toggle so that "cool" mounts like the Nightmare Courser and Frostmare appear as "Normal" mounts to me.
So the fire horse would go from this:
[.img]http://www.indebtedgamers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Nightmare-Courser-2500.jpg[/img]
To this:
[.img]http://i1148.photobucket.com/albums/o575/luscombe1516b/Andala_On_Black_Horse_zps791565cc.png[/img]
This should change everyone's mount but my own, and only in my perspective. If I have a fire mount, and I'm riding it around and also have this toggle turned on, my fire mount is the only fire mount I'll see. This could be accomplished with a toggle in the gameplay options menu or a trophy type item I could activate.
I would pay the same amount as one of these "cool" mounts for this option: 2500 Crowns. I would probably pay more. I really do dislike these mounts being so commonplace.
This concept can also possibly extend to costumes so players can ignore costumes others have on and see their real armor. I could see PVPers liking that option.
It's also important to note that no player would be able to tell if another player has this option turned on. It will in no way impact any other player's experience.
Part of the appeal of over-the-top mounts to some is that they're over-the-top. The thought is that if I buy a peacock mount, I probably want everyone to see it. Such a toggle would then make me less inclined to buy one of these mounts.
I don't know. I quite like some ridiculous things (not so much the nightmare horse but I love GW2's infamous unicorn bow for example), but for me the enjoyment comes from me having it and being able to see it. I couldn't care less who else can or can't see it or what they think.
I probably wouldn't buy this option myself, but I can see how it would be very appealing to some people. And it would actually give ZOS more flexibility to add these types of mounts in future without fear of alienating other players.
lore appropriate
That bugs the hell outta me. NONE of this game is really "lore appropriate".
If you are going to pick and choose what breaks your immersion, why not worry about stuff like EVERYONE fighting for their souls from Molag Bal and the wonkiness of Cadwell's super-fun-adventure-time-happy-grind?
Seems to me these are greater immersion breaks than being inconveniencedone by seeing a horse that is "not rare enough".
Have you seriously not seen the explanation of everyone being the Vestige @Yinmaigao?
Doesn't mean I like our appreciate it for "my immersion".
Anyways, this is getting a little off topic. Just want to say that immersion is cool, but not at others expense.
How would this be at anyone's expense. You wouldn't even know if someone had this toggled.
Attorneyatlawl wrote: »Have you seriously not seen the explanation of everyone being the Vestige @Yinmaigao?
Doesn't mean I like our appreciate it for "my immersion".
Anyways, this is getting a little off topic. Just want to say that immersion is cool, but not at others expense.
How would this be at anyone's expense. You wouldn't even know if someone had this toggled.
Because, people using it would never even know that we had an awesome mount, either, which we earned in-game for some of them (what next, "Disable custom mounts" so even my Golden Senche Tiger looks like a basic brown horse?) or paid crowns for. No comments about "Neat, where did that come from?", or conversation or random interactions in town like people joking about how "Shouldn't his hooves have stopped burning after he went through that stream?", just random Skyrim players milling about.
By taking away time/resources/developers from content that have a greater audience.
As @Attorneyatlawl and I said, there are many more pressing issues that need to be addressed, which impact a larger population of the player base.
By taking away time/resources/developers from content that have a greater audience.
As @Attorneyatlawl and I said, there are many more pressing issues that need to be addressed, which impact a larger population of the player base.
I am so incredibly exhausted by this excuse.
By taking away time/resources/developers from content that have a greater audience.
As @Attorneyatlawl and I said, there are many more pressing issues that need to be addressed, which impact a larger population of the player base.
I am so incredibly exhausted by this excuse.
By taking away time/resources/developers from content that have a greater audience.
As @Attorneyatlawl and I said, there are many more pressing issues that need to be addressed, which impact a larger population of the player base.
I am so incredibly exhausted by this excuse.
By taking away time/resources/developers from content that have a greater audience.
As @Attorneyatlawl and I said, there are many more pressing issues that need to be addressed, which impact a larger population of the player base.
I am so incredibly exhausted by this excuse.
It's getting old ...
There will always be more pressing issues in an mmo
With more content comes new features and Gidorick is just showing another feature that could be considered.
I swear some people think that the person recommending the idea want that idea to become the main focus and nothing else........
By taking away time/resources/developers from content that have a greater audience.
As @Attorneyatlawl and I said, there are many more pressing issues that need to be addressed, which impact a larger population of the player base.
I am so incredibly exhausted by this excuse.By taking away time/resources/developers from content that have a greater audience.
As @Attorneyatlawl and I said, there are many more pressing issues that need to be addressed, which impact a larger population of the player base.
I am so incredibly exhausted by this excuse.
It's getting old ...
There will always be more pressing issues in an mmo
With more content comes new features and Gidorick is just showing another feature that could be considered.
I swear some people think that the person recommending the idea want that idea to become the main focus and nothing else........
Except its true. This game really does have a ton of more important things that are MUCH MORE desirable and have been on the back burner MUCH LONGER. Nothing wrong with suggesting this stuff but jeez, acting like it is important...
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood." - Emerson
TLDR - ZeniMax should just tell the lore-huggers to *** off.
A wonderful quote. Very much the profound and thought-provoking statement.
You do realise that it has nothing to do with the current conversation though, right?
@Yinmaigao if you honestly don't like zombies and wish them to be khajiit, by all means make a thread suggesting a way for that to be accomplished.
But that is not an apt comparison to what I'm suggesting. There is NO narrative reason for flaming horses and ice horses. If there were a quest that rewarded the fire horse, I wouldn't be suggesting this.