newtinmpls wrote: »Because I want to be a kitty.
KhajitFurTrader wrote: »Now I wanna be your dog.
Come on!
MornaBaine wrote: »I think we should get to keep the ability to turn into anything we've been turned into during a quest. It should be part of the end quest reward as a polymorph costume. Any such non-human-shaped form should simply break upon entering combat, just as disguises do in order to avoid animation problems. Though I gotta say a monkey wielding a two-hander would be something to see! LOL
Would be funny i would say though mmm
Easy idea to reproduce as a crown store potion
Wack 200 crowns on a stack of 10
Booom
But would love a permanent item for it i loved things like this in wow
SeñorCinco wrote: »the other night it seemed fitting for my mule, Imamule Cos Enchantingsux, to be a goblin.
... and it frees up an inventory slot.
Robotmafia wrote: »would look kinda weird/stupid if there just monkeys running around everywhere...
newtinmpls wrote: »SeñorCinco wrote: »be one small animal. A cat. Which is odd since I really don't care to play a Khajiit (or at least I've not had one last so far).
i hate it when someone on the forums completely misunderstands the question
newtinmpls wrote: »be one small animal. A cat. Which is odd since I really don't care to play a Khajiit (or at least I've not had one last so far).
i hate it when someone on the forums completely misunderstands the question
newtinmpls wrote: »To clarify; I was the person who voted "no" to being a monkey because of wanting to be a kitty.
I do recall that quest.
I do like the idea of shape-changing into a small critter as a trophy item.
I even like the idea of having a quest reward that allows me to do the shape-changing in ESO.
No, I don't want to be a monkey. That particular potential shapechange has no appeal for me. If there was a shapechange to a critter option - I would want it to be a kitty. The Dev's can now totally feel free to add a new quest and item/trophy just for me
/tongue-in-cheek
That was not the question it was do you think its a good idea to add more trophy ( my example was being a monkey) not do you want to be a monkeySeñorCinco wrote: »newtinmpls wrote: »be one small animal. A cat. Which is odd since I really don't care to play a Khajiit (or at least I've not had one last so far).
i hate it when someone on the forums completely misunderstands the question
I believe this is how you intended your post to be structured.
That was not the question it was do you think its a good idea to add more trophy ( my example was being a monkey) not do you want to be a monkey
That was not the question it was do you think its a good idea to add more trophy ( my example was being a monkey) not do you want to be a monkey
MornaBaine wrote: »I think we should get to keep the ability to turn into anything we've been turned into during a quest. It should be part of the end quest reward as a polymorph costume. Any such non-human-shaped form should simply break upon entering combat, just as disguises do in order to avoid animation problems. Though I gotta say a monkey wielding a two-hander would be something to see! LOL
yeah but i think it should not break becuse then u wont get it again it should just be put awayWould be funny i would say though mmm
Well yeah as a quest reward item it should definitely not "go away" like the disguises do. When I say "break" I merely mean that it is removed when you enter combat. Because I think it'd be impossible for the animations to work properly otherwise.
newtinmpls wrote: »The quoting seems to be acting weird in this post string, so I hope I got the attribution correct.That was not the question it was do you think its a good idea to add more trophy ( my example was being a monkey) not do you want to be a monkey
Interesting.
The wording of the original question was to offer the example of having been (temporarily) a monkey and wanting that option again.
My answer was meant to point out that I like the shapechange option, but I just don't like that shape.
So if what you meant was 'add more shapechange trophies in general' then we are totally on the same page.
SeñorCinco wrote: »
you did not correct me though?
you did not correct me though?