If they make all items BoP instead of BoE it will help the economy then they could just adjust the drop rate.
If the poll goes in your point of view (let the bop system) you would have said exactly the opposite.
If the poll goes in your point of view (let the bop system) you would have said exactly the opposite.
Actually ... not. And I haven't even said what my stance is... so epic fail on your part. I just hate statistical fallacies.
If the poll goes in your point of view (let the bop system) you would have said exactly the opposite.
Actually ... not. And I haven't even said what my stance is... so epic fail on your part. I just hate statistical fallacies.
you clearly let appeared your opinion..
90want to change bop system
Vs
52want to let bop system
If the poll goes in your point of view (let the bop system) you would have said exactly the opposite.
Actually ... not. And I haven't even said what my stance is... so epic fail on your part. I just hate statistical fallacies.
you clearly let appeared your opinion..
90want to change bop system
Vs
52want to let bop system
I... have no idea what this says nor means. I didn't vote in the biased poll. I also haven't said what my opinion is, other than I think that depending on the RNG is the larger problem. Any other inferences are your own.
byrom101b16_ESO wrote: »
If the poll goes in your point of view (let the bop system) you would have said exactly the opposite.
Actually ... not. And I haven't even said what my stance is... so epic fail on your part. I just hate statistical fallacies.
you clearly let appeared your opinion..
90want to change bop system
Vs
52want to let bop system
I... have no idea what this says nor means. I didn't vote in the biased poll. I also haven't said what my opinion is, other than I think that depending on the RNG is the larger problem. Any other inferences are your own.
I think that claiming that such a clear and straight forward pole is somehow biased shows that you have ulterior motives, that is what he is getting at.
If the poll goes in your point of view (let the bop system) you would have said exactly the opposite.
Actually ... not. And I haven't even said what my stance is... so epic fail on your part. I just hate statistical fallacies.
you clearly let appeared your opinion..
90want to change bop system
Vs
52want to let bop system
I... have no idea what this says nor means. I didn't vote in the biased poll. I also haven't said what my opinion is, other than I think that depending on the RNG is the larger problem. Any other inferences are your own.
I think that claiming that such a clear and straight forward pole is somehow biased shows that you have ulterior motives, that is what he is getting at.
But it's not. From the way that the options are presented to the way that they are ordered, to the manner in which the questions are stated to the way that the original question is even stated, there are biases built in. The polls are made for entertainment purposes, and are in no way scientific.
But hey, don't let statistics get in the way of your statistics.
If the poll goes in your point of view (let the bop system) you would have said exactly the opposite.
Actually ... not. And I haven't even said what my stance is... so epic fail on your part. I just hate statistical fallacies.
you clearly let appeared your opinion..
90want to change bop system
Vs
52want to let bop system
If the poll goes in your point of view (let the bop system) you would have said exactly the opposite.
Actually ... not. And I haven't even said what my stance is... so epic fail on your part. I just hate statistical fallacies.
you clearly let appeared your opinion..
90want to change bop system
Vs
52want to let bop system
Sigh.
You have 149 votes on the (somewhat biased) poll, 36% voting "we want free stuff".
That is with a 7.7% margin of error, so it could be 28.3% or it could be 43.3% of the population with this mentality. Not even a majority.
I don't know why you keep bringing up "statistics", they are actually against the point you are trying to make.
All it proves is that 64% (+-7.7%) would like to see changes to the RNG system (me being one of them), not that people want BOP gone
If the poll goes in your point of view (let the bop system) you would have said exactly the opposite.
Actually ... not. And I haven't even said what my stance is... so epic fail on your part. I just hate statistical fallacies.
you clearly let appeared your opinion..
90want to change bop system
Vs
52want to let bop system
Sigh.
You have 149 votes on the (somewhat biased) poll, 36% voting "we want free stuff".
That is with a 7.7% margin of error, so it could be 28.3% or it could be 43.3% of the population with this mentality. Not even a majority.
I don't know why you keep bringing up "statistics", they are actually against the point you are trying to make.
All it proves is that 64% (+-7.7%) would like to see changes to the RNG system (me being one of them), not that people want BOP gone
I noticed from the other thread that you want to keep the BoP system because you don't want others being able to have what you have even if they have hard earned gold to get it.
I am seeing a trend here of people claiming this poll is biased simply because they don't agree with it.
You both also try to downplay that the majority agree that BoP should go away.
If the poll goes in your point of view (let the bop system) you would have said exactly the opposite.
Actually ... not. And I haven't even said what my stance is... so epic fail on your part. I just hate statistical fallacies.
you clearly let appeared your opinion..
90want to change bop system
Vs
52want to let bop system
I... have no idea what this says nor means. I didn't vote in the biased poll. I also haven't said what my opinion is, other than I think that depending on the RNG is the larger problem. Any other inferences are your own.
I think that claiming that such a clear and straight forward pole is somehow biased shows that you have ulterior motives, that is what he is getting at.
But it's not. From the way that the options are presented to the way that they are ordered, to the manner in which the questions are stated to the way that the original question is even stated, there are biases built in. The polls are made for entertainment purposes, and are in no way scientific.
But hey, don't let statistics get in the way of your statistics.
I think the only bias coming through here is from you. No one questions the impartiality of the poll here but you and it doesn't make sense.
kelly.medleyb14_ESO wrote: »Emma_Eunjung wrote: »
I don't think you understand economy very well.
Wow, so much hate for a super biased thread. Biased for good reasons, the RNG in the game is silly and stupid. Period. Biased all the same though.
Without tracking the bad luck streaks of people and the times they've finally gotten xyz with a completely junk trait on top of the junk RNG it just makes bad luck, worse.
Simple way of fixing this problem, is sadly, almost a worse problem..... a rep or token system.
We all know Rep systems suck. It's grind on top of grind.
The only viable, not cheap or cheaty, way of fixing the BOP, BOE, BOA problem is via a gear token system for those items of BOP gear. Run something 60 times or whatever, turn in your 60 tokens for a piece of gear with the trait you want on it out of the ones that would normally drop.
This system is the easiest to implement and is the fairest system. You have to put forth the effort and complete the content to earn a token. The tokens bind to the character that earns them to ward off the system abusing players. Gear earned would bind like normal.
There, problem solved and everyone's happy. Economy isn't in ruins, players can finally get the gear they want, win win.
The gear is supposed to be a reward for the player accomplishing an achievement that is why it's special and can't be crafted, sold , or traded. If it weren't for BoP then everyone with enough gold could have high level gear without earning it.
BoP is a perfect solution to prevent the saturation of high level gear in the game's economy.