Lava_Croft wrote: »So every game without a subscription model is F2P?
Lava_Croft wrote: »So every game without a subscription model is F2P?
"I can't think of an argument, but this guy is displaying a negative attitude towards Zenimax, better correct him on his wording"
Yes yes yes, conspiracy nut and all that.
Really though, they have obviously been planning the switch to F2P a long time.
Thoughts?
Anecdote to illustrate how bizarre I find this claim:
Let's say I bought a new TV. Around the same time I made the statement, "I have no plans to buy a new house" and someone paraphrased it as "jrkhan says he's not going to buy a new house". Lets say I then got a raise and/or another kid.
I then announce "I'm planning on buying a new house"
The obvious conclusion is that I lied! And my purchase of the TV 6 months ago was actually planned for the new living room!
Maidenname wrote: »I can see Zenemax can make tons of money selling forward camps in store
Probably . I just wish everyone would stop fanboi'in around here . You can be a fan of the game with out white knighting all the crappy company policies and decisions being made . Same people that went on an on about how this place would never go a different business model feel the need now to defend that business model . It's like Stockholm syndrome . Give me a break ...
Lava_Croft wrote: »So every game without a subscription model is F2P?
Anecdote to illustrate how bizarre I find this claim:
Let's say I bought a new TV. Around the same time I made the statement, "I have no plans to buy a new house" and someone paraphrased it as "jrkhan says he's not going to buy a new house". Lets say I then got a raise and/or another kid.
I then announce "I'm planning on buying a new house"
The obvious conclusion is that I lied! And my purchase of the TV 6 months ago was actually planned for the new living room!