Steroids are an advantage in sports but I don't expect that someone will use them. I expect them to behave in a sportsman like manner. If they are just a bunch of crooks and thieves what would be the value of the trophy or the game itself?
Then why is there testing for steroids? Why are so many players in sports trying to use them or something like them to gain as advantage? You can't have that expectation that no one is going to use PEDs as the reality says otherwise. As I said, it's going to happen. You fixed the issue yourself by killing them over and over again until you took their fun away and they quit.
I said it ain't cricket to do this, but it is going to happen in a competitive environment. The fact that someone else exploits a broken game mechanic does not make them crooks and thieves. If they stole the items that gave them this exploit, or modded the game so that they had something that no one else could get would make them crooks and thieves.
Either you adapt and stay within your principals or you don't. You adapted, you overcame and took their advantage away and you stuck to your principals. You showed you are a better player of the game than they are because you beat them despite the exploit they were using. Hold your head high and wait for ZOS to fix this, which they will in about 65 hours.
There is testing for steroids because people have used steroids, but that does not mean that I should expect that all players are using steroids. There are many reasons a player may use illegal steroids, but none of those reasons are acceptable reasons to use them.
The term Crook in the legal sense comes from it's shape, not straight. Straight meaning, in that context, parallel to right behavior or the law. In that sense crook is applicable to one who exploits.
I think that a principle that is derived internally is meaningless and certainly arbitrary. Either it exists externally and objective or it is mere subjective illusion. I think most people would agree that there is a real right and wrong. It may not always be clear but as far as the existence of right and wrong I would think most agree on it.
Now because principles and virtues are so compellingly real, prescriptive even, I do have an expectation that people should adhere to them. Do not steal, do not murder etc. In the probabilistic sense I expect people and myself to fail to be virtuous, but I don't expect them in the obligatory sense to fail to be virtuous. We are not obliged to behave poorly, on the contrary we are seemingly obliged to behave rightly by a deep mystery.
Rune_Relic wrote: »
Steroids are an advantage in sports but I don't expect that someone will use them. I expect them to behave in a sportsman like manner. If they are just a bunch of crooks and thieves what would be the value of the trophy or the game itself?
Then why is there testing for steroids? Why are so many players in sports trying to use them or something like them to gain as advantage? You can't have that expectation that no one is going to use PEDs as the reality says otherwise. As I said, it's going to happen. You fixed the issue yourself by killing them over and over again until you took their fun away and they quit.
I said it ain't cricket to do this, but it is going to happen in a competitive environment. The fact that someone else exploits a broken game mechanic does not make them crooks and thieves. If they stole the items that gave them this exploit, or modded the game so that they had something that no one else could get would make them crooks and thieves.
Either you adapt and stay within your principals or you don't. You adapted, you overcame and took their advantage away and you stuck to your principals. You showed you are a better player of the game than they are because you beat them despite the exploit they were using. Hold your head high and wait for ZOS to fix this, which they will in about 65 hours.
There is testing for steroids because people have used steroids, but that does not mean that I should expect that all players are using steroids. There are many reasons a player may use illegal steroids, but none of those reasons are acceptable reasons to use them.
The term Crook in the legal sense comes from it's shape, not straight. Straight meaning, in that context, parallel to right behavior or the law. In that sense crook is applicable to one who exploits.
I think that a principle that is derived internally is meaningless and certainly arbitrary. Either it exists externally and objective or it is mere subjective illusion. I think most people would agree that there is a real right and wrong. It may not always be clear but as far as the existence of right and wrong I would think most agree on it.
Now because principles and virtues are so compellingly real, prescriptive even, I do have an expectation that people should adhere to them. Do not steal, do not murder etc. In the probabilistic sense I expect people and myself to fail to be virtuous, but I don't expect them in the obligatory sense to fail to be virtuous. We are not obliged to behave poorly, on the contrary we are seemingly obliged to behave rightly by a deep mystery.
To me there is no deep mystery. There is group preservation and self preservation. Most see the need for the group to flourish because when the group flourishes so does the individual (ie a conscience). Others do not see beyond their own needs (ego). Few put group preservation before personal preservation. Some see the group as a threat to their personal preservation.
Group preservation requires equality. Hence noble concepts like a round table.
What drives both mentalities at the end of the day is freedom to choose their own destiny and shape their life as they see fit. When everyones desires align there is harmony and all is well. When peoples desire conflict....well....civilisation (the group) implodes.
That conflict develops when the individual gets greedy and feels more entitled than everyone else. Be it wealth, power or any other synonym that leads to survivability and freedom of will.
Some things were specifically designed to create this divide between people to make them easier to control. Drugs...money....social position... physical force...
..you are all addicts to the drug that is power over others. You just dont know it.
michaelb14a_ESO2 wrote: »FluffiestOne wrote: »Andra and I have been using twin sisters before it was cool (hipster status) and people start hopping on the band wagon.
Let me fix that for you "champ":Andra and I have been using exploiting twin sisters before it was cool (hipster status) made public and people start hopping on the band wagon.
I stopped using silver shards when it was bugged. the honorable thing to do would be to stop using the 5th piece of the set until it's fixed
Lava_Croft wrote: »TL;DR lamer will be lamers
Tintinabula wrote: »I got the set BECAUSE I was being killed with twin sisters a lot. I didn't know it was "bugged'. But it made sense to me that being able to carry around an extra 800 DPS simply for blocking and passing that on to whoever used melee on me made good PvP sense.
I don't know what this "stacking" issue is (I'm guessing that if a player like a nightblade hit me more than once it would apply the DOT multiple times?)
I don't apologize for using the set cause Ive died to it multiple times however Ive stopped using it simply because i think I should be able to get more dps via another set and actually "doing" something besides holding down block.(In reality if your burst dps is what it should be in order to break through a shield you should be able to deal enough damage to the enemy before that 800 kills you with something else besides mellee)
Tintinabula wrote: »so people say its bugged because if 4 ppl are wearing it and you mellee those four ppl simultaneously you're screwed?..So they want an immunity built into the armor?
I realize the caltrops thing was super lame and dumb but I don't see much else broke with the set IMHO.
Tintinabula wrote: »As it stands Deathswind knocks back and incapacitates whoever charges you or hits you first for 15+ seconds. Is wearing that set considered an exploit as well?
For what it's worth, Galalin was out there reaping a fresh harvest of AP at KC mill tonight, probably still is as I write this. I felt I'd made sufficient contributions to him and bowed out of the fight, though I did get a couple of kills and a fair bit of damage into him myself.I didn't run out and buy this set because i found out it was broken i already had it. if any of you would like to spend the1.25 million ap for me to buy another PvP set as an alternative until 1.5 speak up! Because i sure as hell dont have that much ap to waste until then. Im pretty sure if one of your sets gave you more than it should and you spent tons on it and couldn't afford somethong else, every fricking one of you would use it.
Rune_Relic wrote: »Tintinabula wrote: »As it stands Deathswind knocks back and incapacitates whoever charges you or hits you first for 15+ seconds. Is wearing that set considered an exploit as well?
It 4s seconds not 15. The idea being f you are being ganged up on by lots of melee fighters (yes melee) and they are within area....and you drop below 35% health they get a knockback (wind of death).
IMHO its a situational armour that offers nothing against magicka or ranged attacks. So I don't see it as OP. It offers nothing bow morphs dont offer except a 35% trigger and not as powerful.
For what it's worth, Galalin was out there reaping a fresh harvest of AP at KC mill tonight, probably still is as I write this. I felt I'd made sufficient contributions to him and bowed out of the fight, though I did get a couple of kills and a fair bit of damage into him myself.I didn't run out and buy this set because i found out it was broken i already had it. if any of you would like to spend the1.25 million ap for me to buy another PvP set as an alternative until 1.5 speak up! Because i sure as hell dont have that much ap to waste until then. Im pretty sure if one of your sets gave you more than it should and you spent tons on it and couldn't afford somethong else, every fricking one of you would use it.
It is a tough situation when you invest so much in something that's about to change drastically and has that negative stigma. Personally I get tired of seeing it on my kill recap, but some of them were legitimate reflects and I don't feel like the ones that weren't would have led to my survival in those fights.
Mainly I should stop throwing myself against brick walls (DKs).
Imo this set isn't really this powerful. It is broken, true. As some people seem to not understand how it is broken, let me quickly explain it. The DoT itself doesn't stack but on some skills but you still get the initial hit. Moreover on some skills (for example crushing shock), the set will always proc. Crushing Shock consists of 3 hits making Twin Sisters proc 3 times. You will have just 1 DoT on you after it, but you take 3 times the initial hit. So with every Crushing Shock you useagainst someone wearing this set, you get hit for 450 damage, which is probably more than what the blocking target takes as damage.
This is a powerful effect of course, but it makes you wear medium armor, so your spell penetration will be a lot lower and your spells cost a lot more unless you go for spell cost reduction enchants, lowering your damage even more.
I didnt try it too much as it was already announced to be going to fixed when I bought the set for testing and I felt a lot weaker with it. Maybe if you do enough testing, it becomes viable and maybe even stronger than your normal setup but it is not like it was the total uber godmode set, as some people try to make it sound like.
Perhaps the reason why it didnt help me too much, is because as a DK most of the ranged attacks possibly hitting me get reflected anyway and it is stronger for other classes.
Tintinabula wrote: »Well its supposed to be fixed tomorrow.Ive been wondering if I should keep this set or upgrade it to gold and I got a gold jack of twin sisters as reward in our campaign so...guess Ill wait and see.