smeeprocketnub19_ESO wrote: »umm why is there no both option, because the teams working on them are not the same.
I just haven't had many bugs, other than quest bugs that I'd just put to the side until the next patch would fix them. So voted for content
*sighs* .....every week a new post like this and every week we have to explain they are 2 different departments, both working on separate things.....not the same department sharing work desks...... *sigh*
Only one game-stopping bug encountered in 5 months and I found a workaround very quickly on the CS forums. Naturally I would opt for more content please.
slopezgamesub17_ESO1 wrote: »I just haven't had many bugs, other than quest bugs that I'd just put to the side until the next patch would fix them. So voted for content
Thats np thats what the poll is for. Depending on what you do in the game will greatly determine the out come of this poll.
If I were still questing and thats all I had an interest in I would probably agree with your decision as the quest bugs have gotten better.
slopezgamesub17_ESO1 wrote: »I just haven't had many bugs, other than quest bugs that I'd just put to the side until the next patch would fix them. So voted for content
Thats np thats what the poll is for. Depending on what you do in the game will greatly determine the out come of this poll.
If I were still questing and thats all I had an interest in I would probably agree with your decision as the quest bugs have gotten better.
A poll is how it relates to the person making the vote, so you can't tell me that isn't how the poll was intended. A person should always vote what is best for himself/herself not what that person thinks is best of everyone else. If everyone votes for what is best for themselves then what is best for the majority will naturally rise to the top.
So, because I don't see bugs, I can only vote for content as it would be a waste of time fixing bugs that don't exist in my world.
and you got butt hurt when I didn't vote your way and told me that I read the poll wrong. For ME, I prefer new content. I'm sure most would say otherwise, but I'm still allowed to have my voice.
Well if they had to do one OR the other fixing the bugs is a much bigger priority. Maybe they'll figure something out that will stop future bugs from being released in new content.
slopezgamesub17_ESO1 wrote: »Only one game-stopping bug encountered in 5 months and I found a workaround very quickly on the CS forums. Naturally I would opt for more content please.
I do both PVE and PVP, while doing both I have found that the PVE content to be less buggy. However, while doing pvp I have found the game to be very buggy and full of class specific exploits that are very frustrating while playing.
If I were just a pve player I would probably vote for more content but I'm not I do both and until Zos can fix the foundation of the game adding more content just seems to add more bugs and exploits. Imo fix the game to about 90% functionality and then add more content.
Not a matter of what I 'prefer' BOTH should be a high priority for Zenimax !
slopezgamesub17_ESO1 wrote: »smeeprocketnub19_ESO wrote: »umm why is there no both option, because the teams working on them are not the same.
While this is true it's because imo they need to prioritize their funding to the proper dept for what the players want.
Their current approach imo is not working which is why I created this poll.
DenverRalphy wrote: »slopezgamesub17_ESO1 wrote: »smeeprocketnub19_ESO wrote: »umm why is there no both option, because the teams working on them are not the same.
While this is true it's because imo they need to prioritize their funding to the proper dept for what the players want.
Their current approach imo is not working which is why I created this poll.
Prioritize how exactly? The content developers are employees that need to be paid. If they're not developing content, they're still drawing a paycheck. Having them sit on their hands accomplishes nothing. They're not coders, they're artists that write material, design and create 3D models, build terrain etc...
The only way you could possibly "prioritize funding", would be to stop paying them. Lay them off, and you'd have a dickens of a time trying to re-hire those positions when needed later because few qualified in the industry would work for a company that performed in that manner.
It is generally not an either or situation. For the most part, the staff that fixes bugs is not he same people who create new content.
driosketch wrote: »There are going to be bugs either way. I say bring on the new content.
JessieColt wrote: »OP, you seem not to understand how a game company works.