An interesting read, thanks for linking. I'm not sure how I feel about Skyrim being described as "somewhat" inclusive to female players - I can't think of many games more inclusive than TES - but okay. I see the author's point. The part about women in position of power made me cringe though. The conclusions are not wrong, but the preceding factual errors... Anyhow, this subject deserves its own article.IrishGirlGamer wrote: »(BTW, Skyrim has not gone unnoticed by women writing on gender roles in modern media: http://womeningamestudies.com/exploring-the-virtual-dollhouse-ludic-play-in-skyrim/ ).
Not all games. My characters had lovers leave them and friends become estranged because of their choices. It's not as much about male dominance as the player's dominance - the world revolving around us.IrishGirlGamer wrote: »A video game allows you to be as completely selfish as you want to be and still get what you want out of the "relationship."
Male players playing female characters has one extremely useful fact that you can't avoid. Females tend to get WAY more free stuff. Friend of mine got the primal motif for free, just because they were a "good person."
I can't even get free worms.
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »ganja.mullarwb17_ESO wrote: »Im really glad you are enjoying the game and playing it like the dev's would want all their customers to. However checking out walk animations on a female character while being female yourself prompts a like of another kind xD.
Really? Does it? Why? Are you a guy who plays as a girl? Do you then think all women want to play as men? Why? So we can watch a toon's butt move across the screen?
Snarcasm aside, I don't really understand the male fascination with playing as women. If men had to experience all of womanhood when they played women in video games, there'd be a lot less 16 year old schoolgirl heroes running around Tamriel.
Male players playing female characters has one extremely useful fact that you can't avoid. Females tend to get WAY more free stuff. Friend of mine got the primal motif for free, just because they were a "good person." I can't even get free worms.
I give him/her a weekers101284b14_ESO wrote: »SHHHHHH!!!!! Haters are gonna hear you and much like my Ex Gf's they will smell your happiness and set out to destroy it.
@IrishGirlGamer - Hah, thank you!
If you're ever looking for some RP or someone who is sort of slow and not all about the numbers, feel free to find me in game.
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »I see nothing here worthy of a response so I am responding that it is not an actual response. Enjoy your female walk animation OP.
I will and thank you.
With your ability to perform complicated logic and obvious superior intellectual development, you are indeed a rarity. Do take care of yourself, Dr. Manhattan.
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »@IrishGirlGamer - Hah, thank you!
If you're ever looking for some RP or someone who is sort of slow and not all about the numbers, feel free to find me in game.
@ThePonzzz,
So here's the thing: I was fresh out of worms. So I just sent you some crap I found tonight on the beach in Khenarthi's Roost.
Enjoy. (P.S. And now you're like a girl who gets things for free.).
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »@IrishGirlGamer - Hah, thank you!
If you're ever looking for some RP or someone who is sort of slow and not all about the numbers, feel free to find me in game.
@ThePonzzz,
So here's the thing: I was fresh out of worms. So I just sent you some crap I found tonight on the beach in Khenarthi's Roost.
Enjoy. (P.S. And now you're like a girl who gets things for free.).
I shall catch a glorious fish in your honor!
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »I see nothing here worthy of a response so I am responding that it is not an actual response. Enjoy your female walk animation OP.
I will and thank you.
With your ability to perform complicated logic and obvious superior intellectual development, you are indeed a rarity. Do take care of yourself, Dr. Manhattan.
I will take this as a compliment since you reference one of the greatest graphic novels to have ever been penned.
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »@ThePonzzz: Hmmm ... I've been in the game a few days but I still haven't got any free stuff, either. Maybe I'm not using the right ... approach.
But don't worry - I send you some worms next time I'm online.Trust me, I got a bunch.
@Rosveen: I'm not "hating" anything. To hate something - as the word is defined - I'd have to feel a strong, passionate and emotional dislike. Witcher amuses me more than offends me. If I don't have to see it - and I don't - then it's not really bothering me, is it?
We could have a fascinating discussion about how woman are depicted (or reflected) in video games. Think about your comment about the magically changing dresses in Skyrim (which was another HUGE frustration of mine - what, I can't wear pants? Really?). And now consider that the Bethesda Skyrim team had a number of women on it. Did it not occur to them? And if it did, why did they not say anything? If you go through the published images of the female members of the team, none of them are wearing dresses.
(BTW, Skyrim has not gone unnoticed by women writing on gender roles in modern media: http://womeningamestudies.com/exploring-the-virtual-dollhouse-ludic-play-in-skyrim/ ).
This fall I'm beginning my Ph.D work and unless something changes dramatically, I'll be researching and writing on the artistic interpretation of gender in video games. Not just obvious stuff like Skyrim, Mass Effect, Uncharted and so on, but also Zelda, a number indie games, and now TESO.
For years the video game industry has been dominated by males. Men played video games, women did ... whatever. Video games reflected that male dominance and played on male desires. In much the same way that stereotypes existed in what is called men's fiction or film, video games created a stereotype the strong dominant male in control of his world - the perfect escape for the man who felt his power and status in the real world were diminishing, along with his ability to control that world.
Witcher is a perfect example. Maybe the player can't get a date with the woman he wants but he can play this video game where that type of woman HAS TO like him - and his power is them reflected in their sexual surrender to him. How cool is that? And as @Singular points out: there's none of the "ugliness" of humanity: physical or emotional. A video game allows you to be as completely selfish as you want to be and still get what you want out of the "relationship." It's a psychological win/win, where the player gets what he wants and the studio gets his money.
What games like TESO and Skyrim have done is advance girls and women into the gaming industry via a major studio - not just as players, but as designers, artists and developers. I don't think it's unintentional that female roles in the TES series have equalized over the last few releases. Clearly there are a number of talented female artists working for Bethesda and TESO and their finding their voices - which is a great thing.
I look forward to the day in the not too distant future when the museum I work for features an exhibit about art in video games - and I'm not having to see a man's name by almost every exhibit.
Edit: And isn't it interesting now that in TESO, men are forced to wear robes - which are referred to on this forum as dresses ...
ThreeEyedCrow wrote: »Interesting point. While I believe the recent estimates from market research are that 47-48% of all gamers are now female, the design studios themselves might be very male dominated still. Since the market is basically half female, it would certainly be in company's interests to start hiring more females and getting their input on design and gameplay aspects.
I was just complaing that i have nothing sexy to wear XD
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »Men sometimes assume women don't want to look attractive in video games, when really we just don't want to look ridiculous.
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »Men sometimes assume women don't want to look attractive in video games, when really we just don't want to look ridiculous.
This is my main complaint when it comes to female characters in video games, walking around in metal bikinis and the like is absurd. I'm not against female characters looking "attractive" I'm just against ludicrous "armor' designs that wouldn't actually serve as real armor. TBH this is why I'm such a big fan of Brienne in GoT, they held closer to the books and dressed her up in actual functional armor. Anyway, hoping this thread doesn't turn into another "skimpy armors thread' that place was horrid. lol.
robynheraty_ESO wrote: »I'm also happy that the female armor isn't embarrassingly skimpy, either.
Pfffft this game needs a lot more cleavage in the outfits
I think the opposite is true. Male developers rationalize skimpy armor thinking that "women like to look pretty," so with both sides in favor of it (because all men enjoy skimpy armor...), why not have metal thongs and boob window plate armor?IrishGirlGamer wrote: »I was just complaing that i have nothing sexy to wear XD
Funny thing about that. When I was getting an MFA in the U.S., one of my colleagues conducted a study involving IIR aboiut 100+ female gamers. They were mostly undergraduates at the university. To participate, they had to have at least three years experience playing in MMOs.
The women were shown several series of images of women from MMOs like Second Life and other games. In each of the series of images, the women's clothing/armor ranged from conservative to really skimpy. The women picked, on the range from 1 to 5, what clothing/armor they would be comfortable wearing in the game. They were also asked to comment on their choice. IIR, there were three or four series of images, but one was definitely an armor set.
Over 30% (IIR about 32%) of the verified women in the study chose within the 3 to 4 range (1 being the most conservative coverage). At least 10% chose the 4 to 5 range. And the most common reason for not choosing the more revealing armors was factual and rational (protection) as opposed to gender issues or modesty.
Men sometimes assume women don't want to look attractive in video games, when really we just don't want to look ridiculous.
ers101284b14_ESO wrote: »So you mean this shouldn't be the best female armor in the game?
http://marvellousmoandme.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/bandaid2.jpg
seriously though I agree, sexy does not always mean skimpy.
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »We could have a fascinating discussion about how woman are depicted (or reflected) in video games. Think about your comment about the magically changing dresses in Skyrim (which was another HUGE frustration of mine - what, I can't wear pants? Really?). And now consider that the Bethesda Skyrim team had a number of women on it. Did it not occur to them? And if it did, why did they not say anything? If you go through the published images of the female members of the team, none of them are wearing dresses.
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »This fall I'm beginning my Ph.D work and unless something changes dramatically, I'll be researching and writing on the artistic interpretation of gender in video games. Not just obvious stuff like Skyrim, Mass Effect, Uncharted and so on, but also Zelda, a number indie games, and now TESO.
I don't think you'll pass muster for that Ph.D, sorry. Well unless it's a degree like something from psychology or sociology or women's studies, something useless in the real world. The requirements for those areas are so lax you could write about anything and get a Ph.D.(BTW, Skyrim has not gone unnoticed by women writing on gender roles in modern media: http://womeningamestudies.com/exploring-the-virtual-dollhouse-ludic-play-in-skyrim/ ).
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »For years the video game industry has been dominated by males. Men played video games, women did ... whatever. Video games reflected that male dominance and played on male desires. In much the same way that stereotypes existed in what is called men's fiction or film, video games created a stereotype the strong dominant male in control of his world - the perfect escape for the man who felt his power and status in the real world were diminishing, along with his ability to control that world.
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »Witcher is a perfect example. Maybe the player can't get a date with the woman he wants but he can play this video game where that type of woman HAS TO like him - and his power is them reflected in their sexual surrender to him. How cool is that? And as @Singular points out: there's none of the "ugliness" of humanity: physical or emotional. A video game allows you to be as completely selfish as you want to be and still get what you want out of the "relationship." It's a psychological win/win, where the player gets what he wants and the studio gets his money.
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »What games like TESO and Skyrim have done is advance girls and women into the gaming industry via a major studio - not just as players, but as designers, artists and developers. I don't think it's unintentional that female roles in the TES series have equalized over the last few releases. Clearly there are a number of talented female artists working for Bethesda and TESO and their finding their voices - which is a great thing.
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »I look forward to the day in the not too distant future when the museum I work for features an exhibit about art in video games - and I'm not having to see a man's name by almost every exhibit.
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »Edit: And isn't it interesting now that in TESO, men are forced to wear robes - which are referred to on this forum as dresses ...
cigarsmoker wrote: »This has nothing to do with game design and everything to do with HISTORICAL fact.
cigarsmoker wrote: »If it is as short sighted and prejudiced as this link you posted:
...
I don't think you'll pass muster for that Ph.D, sorry.
cigarsmoker wrote: »Men's power and status in the real world IS diminishing. His home is no longer his castle, and his only area of control might be his Garage or Yard.
*Sniff* *Sniff*
What the hell is that.. it smells like.. Happiness..
I HATE HAPPINESS
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »cigarsmoker wrote: »This has nothing to do with game design and everything to do with HISTORICAL fact.
You know what I absolutely love about this statement? Apart from it's obvious historical inaccuracy, it's how men can argue, with a straight face, that women have to wear a dress because it's historical reality and at the same time insist she should run around in latex lingerie because TES is fantasy game.cigarsmoker wrote: »If it is as short sighted and prejudiced as this link you posted:
...
I don't think you'll pass muster for that Ph.D, sorry.
How fortunate for me the trustees and faculty of the Department of Art History at Georgetown University get to make that decision - and not you.cigarsmoker wrote: »Men's power and status in the real world IS diminishing. His home is no longer his castle, and his only area of control might be his Garage or Yard.
And I think we have a winner here ...
IrishGirlGamer wrote: »I was just complaing that i have nothing sexy to wear XD
Funny thing about that. When I was getting an MFA in the U.S., one of my colleagues conducted a study involving IIR aboiut 100+ female gamers. They were mostly undergraduates at the university. To participate, they had to have at least three years experience playing in MMOs.
The women were shown several series of images of women from MMOs like Second Life and other games. In each of the series of images, the women's clothing/armor ranged from conservative to really skimpy. The women picked, on the range from 1 to 5, what clothing/armor they would be comfortable wearing in the game. They were also asked to comment on their choice. IIR, there were three or four series of images, but one was definitely an armor set.
Over 30% (IIR about 32%) of the verified women in the study chose within the 3 to 4 range (1 being the most conservative coverage). At least 10% chose the 4 to 5 range. And the most common reason for not choosing the more revealing armors was factual and rational (protection) as opposed to gender issues or modesty.
Men sometimes assume women don't want to look attractive in video games, when really we just don't want to look ridiculous.
cigarsmoker wrote: »If you don't see how men are slowly being knocked down in status in the real world I don't know what to tell you. Maybe watch any sitcom for a few episodes? See how it's always the 'goofy and idiot father figure' and the 'intelligent and in control mother figure' portrayed. But hey what do I know it's only TV, the most influential device in history.