My girlfriend wants to play this and is interested in healing.
Can I get some information on how healing works in ESO(PvP and PvE specific if possible), and the differences in healing on each class.
If it helps she was a big fan of disc priest and resto druid healing in WoW. I'm not expecting too many similarities in this game though.
Thanks in advance.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Templars do more dps than DK's.
No. Only Templar can heal challenging fights. Of course "challenging" is subjective. But if you have a group and a tank that's shaky, in comparison to the encounter, than you must have a Templar.
Restoration Staff is good for back-up group healing and building Ultimate. Offers nice hybridizations and comes with a few good skills. But lacks any form of powerful spot heals and burst heals. Also lacks the ability to help the tank regain stamina, another perk of Templar.
Point is, If you want good healing or main healing, than you have to play Templar. Sadly, I might add. Because their dps or tanking isn't competitive, so no flexibility as far as roles goes. But than again 3/4 classes lacks competitive healing. That's not flexible or fair either.
Really wish Eso would stay true to their "play what you want" philosophy
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Templars do more dps than DK's.
plymale.jonathanb14_ESO wrote: »Above post is absolutely 100% wrong. Templars only advantage healing is the healing ultimate, which is totally a non factor with a crit surge healing springs spamming sorc with barrier.
Source: V12 trial healing templar that only goes out of guild pity. It is not ideal or overall efficient to even bring 1 templar.
Edit for Clarity: templars are the best healers, However you never need the best healers in the game... for anything. You need someone that can get the job done and dps when you are not experiencing an oh-**** phase change in a boss encounter. A crit surge healing springs spam sorc is way more than enough to get the job done and can also pull 200-400% of the templar's dps during down time.
Edit for Clarity: templars are the best healers, However you never need the best healers in the game... for anything. You need someone that can get the job done and dps when you are not experiencing an oh-**** phase change in a boss encounter.
A crit surge healing springs spam sorc is way more than enough to get the job done and can also pull 200-400% of the templar's dps during down time.
One of the biggest differences between ESO and WoW healing is that you can't just spam heals all the time. You need to be doing something else, which for a healer, means contantly using your restoration staff heavy attack to regenerate magicka.
If she has played a disc priest and is used to atonement healing, then this would be the most similar to ESO healing. And it case it's not obvious, there is no click-healing. It's all directional, ground aoe, or smart heals.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Templars do more dps than DK's.
If you think you can heal all content with healing springs,you are a bit wrong.
Sure,when group is stacked,it works but there are a lot of situations that the group is spread.
Also when the tank gets hit for a lot of burst dmg,then you need an instant heal to get him back to full hp,ony templars have that.
Basically,the post of eliisra,above you is completely right and describes the good and bad things of templar.
One of the biggest differences between ESO and WoW healing is that you can't just spam heals all the time. You need to be doing something else, which for a healer, means contantly using your restoration staff heavy attack to regenerate magicka.
If she has played a disc priest and is used to atonement healing, then this would be the most similar to ESO healing. And it case it's not obvious, there is no click-healing. It's all directional, ground aoe, or smart heals.
In WoW you tend to watch bars go up and down and many times "miss" whats really going on. I think this smart healing makes you more aware of the game rather than focusing on addons.
One of the biggest differences between ESO and WoW healing is that you can't just spam heals all the time. You need to be doing something else, which for a healer, means contantly using your restoration staff heavy attack to regenerate magicka.
If she has played a disc priest and is used to atonement healing, then this would be the most similar to ESO healing. And it case it's not obvious, there is no click-healing. It's all directional, ground aoe, or smart heals.
In WoW you tend to watch bars go up and down and many times "miss" whats really going on. I think this smart healing makes you more aware of the game rather than focusing on addons.
plymale.jonathanb14_ESO wrote: »
If you think you can heal all content with healing springs,you are a bit wrong.
Sure,when group is stacked,it works but there are a lot of situations that the group is spread.
Also when the tank gets hit for a lot of burst dmg,then you need an instant heal to get him back to full hp,ony templars have that.
Basically,the post of eliisra,above you is completely right and describes the good and bad things of templar.
I don't want my disagreement to come off as a personal attack, or to insinuate that your experiences with the game are somehow wrong. With that being said, It seems like you have never played with a non-templar healer running the alliance war support ultimate "Barrier". This skill trivializes those big hits you are referring to. When used in conjunction with other class ultimate and the siege shield, it allows raids to completely ignore encounter mechanics and run straight dps on bosses (specifically in trials). This is the easiest and most efficient way of doing end-game content, and if gaming/mmo history has taught us anything, its that players will Always collectively gravitate to the fastest/easiest route to end game gearing and raiding.
If you can accept the above premise, then it stands to reason that templars inevitably have and will continue to be marginalized for raiding / dungeon runs until class balance is addressed. A lot of the rage you will see on these forums, perhaps rightly so, is because there has not been a single ZOS acknowledgement of how down and out templars feel in the "meta" right now.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Templars do more dps than DK's.
f0rgiv3n27b14_ESO wrote: »One of the biggest differences between ESO and WoW healing is that you can't just spam heals all the time. You need to be doing something else, which for a healer, means contantly using your restoration staff heavy attack to regenerate magicka.
If she has played a disc priest and is used to atonement healing, then this would be the most similar to ESO healing. And it case it's not obvious, there is no click-healing. It's all directional, ground aoe, or smart heals.
In WoW you tend to watch bars go up and down and many times "miss" whats really going on. I think this smart healing makes you more aware of the game rather than focusing on addons.
I healed in WoW, Rift, WAR, Tera, and now ESO. I can say without a doubt that Tera had the most fun healing I have ever played... You had to be aware of the bosses positions, your position, the bosses telegraphs, and all of these where you had a target recticle like ESO in the center of your screen where you actually had to target the player to you wanted to heal with a ST heal...
Later on you could add a "morph" to the skill that let you target and lock on to multiple targets then cast the heal when needed.
I had a blast healing in Tera, I am sure that game made me a better healer... in WoW, for the most part all I did was play Whack-a-mole with bars, didn't have to pay attention to anything else.
Having played Tera it really made me a better pvp healer in WAR, now ESO, where you must always be aware of the battlefield and your positioning.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Templars do more dps than DK's.
I think there are pluses and minuses to both systems. I agree that ESO encourages you to be more "in the action." However, since I'm not a fan of atonement healing in WoW, I'm not really digging the resto staff heavy attack requirement in ESO.
Irks me a wee bit - or maybe I got the wrong impression - that a non templar with a healing staff seems to be doing as good a job if not better than a templar with healing staff and running the class healing tree. If i ever have the nerve to make an alt I'll try it out myself.plymale.jonathanb14_ESO wrote: »
If you think you can heal all content with healing springs,you are a bit wrong.
Sure,when group is stacked,it works but there are a lot of situations that the group is spread.
Also when the tank gets hit for a lot of burst dmg,then you need an instant heal to get him back to full hp,ony templars have that.
Basically,the post of eliisra,above you is completely right and describes the good and bad things of templar.
I don't want my disagreement to come off as a personal attack, or to insinuate that your experiences with the game are somehow wrong. With that being said, It seems like you have never played with a non-templar healer running the alliance war support ultimate "Barrier". This skill trivializes those big hits you are referring to. When used in conjunction with other class ultimate and the siege shield, it allows raids to completely ignore encounter mechanics and run straight dps on bosses (specifically in trials). This is the easiest and most efficient way of doing end-game content, and if gaming/mmo history has taught us anything, its that players will Always collectively gravitate to the fastest/easiest route to end game gearing and raiding.
If you can accept the above premise, then it stands to reason that templars inevitably have and will continue to be marginalized for raiding / dungeon runs until class balance is addressed. A lot of the rage you will see on these forums, perhaps rightly so, is because there has not been a single ZOS acknowledgement of how down and out templars feel in the "meta" right now.
@dakhon
This.
I was about to answer you but I felt we would get off topic. Post above pretty much sums it up.
Irks me a wee bit - or maybe I got the wrong impression - that a non templar with a healing staff seems to be doing as good as a job if not better than a templar with healing staff and running the class healing tree. If i ever have the nerve to make an alt I'll try it out myself.plymale.jonathanb14_ESO wrote: »
If you think you can heal all content with healing springs,you are a bit wrong.
Sure,when group is stacked,it works but there are a lot of situations that the group is spread.
Also when the tank gets hit for a lot of burst dmg,then you need an instant heal to get him back to full hp,ony templars have that.
Basically,the post of eliisra,above you is completely right and describes the good and bad things of templar.
I don't want my disagreement to come off as a personal attack, or to insinuate that your experiences with the game are somehow wrong. With that being said, It seems like you have never played with a non-templar healer running the alliance war support ultimate "Barrier". This skill trivializes those big hits you are referring to. When used in conjunction with other class ultimate and the siege shield, it allows raids to completely ignore encounter mechanics and run straight dps on bosses (specifically in trials). This is the easiest and most efficient way of doing end-game content, and if gaming/mmo history has taught us anything, its that players will Always collectively gravitate to the fastest/easiest route to end game gearing and raiding.
If you can accept the above premise, then it stands to reason that templars inevitably have and will continue to be marginalized for raiding / dungeon runs until class balance is addressed. A lot of the rage you will see on these forums, perhaps rightly so, is because there has not been a single ZOS acknowledgement of how down and out templars feel in the "meta" right now.
@dakhon
This.
I was about to answer you but I felt we would get off topic. Post above pretty much sums it up.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Templars do more dps than DK's.