No, OP really is right, once both sides know what to do, starts, synergies, counters and counter counters etc, it all boils down to who is favored by rng this time.
SilverBride wrote: »Winning isn't as dependent on getting good cards as much as learning what to do with the ones you are dealt.
POV: you are blessed with first move
POV: you are blessed with first move
I'd rather pick the hlaalu card (6 gold in a combo) and use the treasury instead - those 4 power are not a problem, but a quick coin gain from the very start will enable me to buy other higher value cards more quickly. Choosing the armory is not the best move here. And because I will have more coin more quickly, I might pick up the Rally later on, which is of more use in a combo deck.
No, OP really is right, once both sides know what to do, starts, synergies, counters and counter counters etc, it all boils down to who is favored by rng this time.
POV: you are blessed with first move
I'd rather pick the hlaalu card (6 gold in a combo) and use the treasury instead - those 4 power are not a problem, but a quick coin gain from the very start will enable me to buy other higher value cards more quickly. Choosing the armory is not the best move here. And because I will have more coin more quickly, I might pick up the Rally later on, which is of more use in a combo deck.
These are all contract non-agent cards which you won't keep, by buying Hlaalu card you just lose 1 gold and reveal next card (for your opponent more likely than yourself), that card is Combo 3 and on first turn you can't do that since you can only possibly have one.
SeaGtGruff wrote: »No, OP really is right, once both sides know what to do, starts, synergies, counters and counter counters etc, it all boils down to who is favored by rng this time.
If that were true, I should be losing a lot more than I am. Granted, I've only played against NPCs so far, so there's also the question of how "skilled" the AI that's controlling the NPCs' moves is. But if it's all primarily just RNG, then it shouldn't matter whether I'm playing against an intelligent AI, an unintelligent AI, or an actual player, because everyone's win-to-lose ratio should be roughly 50-50.
SeaGtGruff wrote: »No, OP really is right, once both sides know what to do, starts, synergies, counters and counter counters etc, it all boils down to who is favored by rng this time.
If that were true, I should be losing a lot more than I am. Granted, I've only played against NPCs so far, so there's also the question of how "skilled" the AI that's controlling the NPCs' moves is. But if it's all primarily just RNG, then it shouldn't matter whether I'm playing against an intelligent AI, an unintelligent AI, or an actual player, because everyone's win-to-lose ratio should be roughly 50-50.
Necrotech_Master wrote: »SeaGtGruff wrote: »No, OP really is right, once both sides know what to do, starts, synergies, counters and counter counters etc, it all boils down to who is favored by rng this time.
If that were true, I should be losing a lot more than I am. Granted, I've only played against NPCs so far, so there's also the question of how "skilled" the AI that's controlling the NPCs' moves is. But if it's all primarily just RNG, then it shouldn't matter whether I'm playing against an intelligent AI, an unintelligent AI, or an actual player, because everyone's win-to-lose ratio should be roughly 50-50.
it is a combination of intelligence and luck
as for the NPCs, their AI does not always make fully optimized moves and generally its very easy to win against them
if i had to guess ive probably played around 40 matches total against npcs, and ive only lost a handful (maybe 5, some of which were due to making poor choices of buying from tavern and then bad RNG by the next card drawn to tavern being something good for the opponent)