Snowhawk is major city in Arena. It was a rival of Solitude in terms of size and wealth but by 4e200, all that remains is ruins.
Did ZoS just forgot about that city?
Yeah I think this is quite likely. And then by 4E 201, it's destroyed, possibly by the Oblivion crisis.Maybe the city hasn't been founded yet? 800 years is more than enough time for one to spring up, and AFAIK there isn't any lore confirming its existence before the events of Arena, much less during the Second Era.
The_Drop_Bear wrote: »Snowhawk is major city in Arena. It was a rival of Solitude in terms of size and wealth but by 4e200, all that remains is ruins.
Did ZoS just forgot about that city?
Snowhawk was likely retconned out if existence. It doesn't exist and there is no trace of it in Skyrim or ESO.
Arena was the first game and lots in it is no longer canon. For example in arena you go into red mountain and don't have any issues with the ghost fence, or corpus or Dagoth despite the fact they were around.
The_Drop_Bear wrote: »Snowhawk is major city in Arena. It was a rival of Solitude in terms of size and wealth but by 4e200, all that remains is ruins.
Did ZoS just forgot about that city?
Snowhawk was likely retconned out if existence. It doesn't exist and there is no trace of it in Skyrim or ESO.
Arena was the first game and lots in it is no longer canon. For example in arena you go into red mountain and don't have any issues with the ghost fence, or corpus or Dagoth despite the fact they were around.
Cygemai_Hlervu wrote: »The_Drop_Bear wrote: »Snowhawk is major city in Arena. It was a rival of Solitude in terms of size and wealth but by 4e200, all that remains is ruins.
Did ZoS just forgot about that city?
Snowhawk was likely retconned out if existence. It doesn't exist and there is no trace of it in Skyrim or ESO.
Arena was the first game and lots in it is no longer canon. For example in arena you go into red mountain and don't have any issues with the ghost fence, or corpus or Dagoth despite the fact they were around.
It does exist in both in the Skyrim and ESO - why are you so confident it doesn't? If it doesn't, then what was the battefield's name of the Battle for Fort Snowhawk? Here's the picture of the Snowhawk ruins of 4E 201:
Moreover, Snowhawk is mentioned in the Snowhawk Mage Style's name in ESO and this city exists there, though as a regional town, called Karthwatch. If you look at the ESO map of the place, you'll see that the town is located exactly at the place of the future Snowhawk. It just hasn't changed it's name yet.
Regarding the Ghostfence. The events of the First Elder Scroll take place in Tamriel of the 3E 389 - 3E 399. The Intermittent Tribunal campaigns to assault Red Mountain are performed in 2E 882-3E 417 until the Tribunes lose the Tools. According to the Ancestors and the Dunmer, the Great Ghost Fence was created by the Tribunal to hold back the Blight - this reason was first mentioned as a serious trouble by the year of 3E 400 in this document. Since the real reason to build the fence happened in 3E 400 and since there is no Great Ghostfence in 3E 389 - 3E 399, then the logic tells us, that the wall was constructed some time between 3E 400 and 3E 417 (when it is mentioned as an already maintained facility). The same way you can understand how was that even possible we haven't met Dagoth Ur in TES I and etc. It is a mistake to think that lots of things shown in TES I are no more canon.
We are primarily talking about Snowhawk the city, not the Imperial fort that was named after it. There is no trace of the city in either Skyrim or ESO.Cygemai_Hlervu wrote: »The_Drop_Bear wrote: »Snowhawk is major city in Arena. It was a rival of Solitude in terms of size and wealth but by 4e200, all that remains is ruins.
Did ZoS just forgot about that city?
Snowhawk was likely retconned out if existence. It doesn't exist and there is no trace of it in Skyrim or ESO.
Arena was the first game and lots in it is no longer canon. For example in arena you go into red mountain and don't have any issues with the ghost fence, or corpus or Dagoth despite the fact they were around.
It does exist in both in the Skyrim and ESO - why are you so confident it doesn't? If it doesn't, then what was the battefield's name of the Battle for Fort Snowhawk? Here's the picture of the Snowhawk ruins of 4E 201:
There is no trace of the city in either Skyrim or ESO.
Cygemai_Hlervu wrote: »
Cygemai_Hlervu wrote: »There is no trace of the city in either Skyrim or ESO.
Once again regarding ESO:Cygemai_Hlervu wrote: »
Regarding TES V: Fort Snowhawk of the Fourth Era is located at the same point the city was in 3E 389 - 3E 399 - this is all what is left of that city.
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/elderscrolls/images/8/88/FortSnowhawkMap.jpg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/360?cb=20120304203611
Please witness above image for those saying Snowhawk exists in ESO. It doesn't.
At least, not as a full-fledged settlement, or fort. In ESO, Snowhawk should be located where Havil's Farmhouse is currently. As to why Snowhawk was removed... God knows? I certainly don't.
I'm telling you guys, Snowhawk was and will be Morthal.
Here's the map of Skyrim for Arena:
Morthal is missing on that map, but yet somehow exists in ESO. And Snowhawk is almost where it should be, if you assume Karthwasten Hall is Karthwasten in Skyrim, which is across the river from Broken Tower Redoubt/ESO's Karthwatch.
It seems to me that Morthal was either renamed to or absorbed by Snowhawk sometime between ESO and Arena, only for it to go back to Morthal by Skyrim.
My guess for reverting back was that Snowhawk was all but destroyed on the Oblivion Crisis, and only the part that was once Morthal was resettled afterwards.
As for the lack of ruins, I figure there is a twofold explanation; first is that if resettlement occured almost immediately, any buildings that were standing were likely torn down for their materials. The second is that, for a city to be built where Fort Snowhawk/Morthal is, there would have to be a major levee and dam system to push back the marsh and dry out the land. If that was broken during the Oblivion Crisis, with marsh water flooding back in, then pretty much anything made out of stone would start sinking, and two centuries *might* be just long enough for much of it to be below the surface or waterline, especially if there was nothing left but foundations.
I'm telling you guys, Snowhawk was and will be Morthal.
Here's the map of Skyrim for Arena:
Morthal is missing on that map, but yet somehow exists in ESO. And Snowhawk is almost where it should be, if you assume Karthwasten Hall is Karthwasten in Skyrim, which is across the river from Broken Tower Redoubt/ESO's Karthwatch.
It seems to me that Morthal was either renamed to or absorbed by Snowhawk sometime between ESO and Arena, only for it to go back to Morthal by Skyrim.
My guess for reverting back was that Snowhawk was all but destroyed on the Oblivion Crisis, and only the part that was once Morthal was resettled afterwards.
As for the lack of ruins, I figure there is a twofold explanation; first is that if resettlement occured almost immediately, any buildings that were standing were likely torn down for their materials. The second is that, for a city to be built where Fort Snowhawk/Morthal is, there would have to be a major levee and dam system to push back the marsh and dry out the land. If that was broken during the Oblivion Crisis, with marsh water flooding back in, then pretty much anything made out of stone would start sinking, and two centuries *might* be just long enough for much of it to be below the surface or waterline, especially if there was nothing left but foundations.
OtarTheMad wrote: »EDIT- As Endoc mentioned Snowhawk, by Skyrim's time, could have easily been destroyed in the Oblivion Crisis and abandoned leaving only the fort. However, the fort we see in Skyrim could have just been named after the fallen town.