Four templars?
Furiano
Soul Shriven
For you, is it normal to fight vs 4 templars and 4 nightblades in a bg?
Don't you think it's appropiate to set limits?
Don't you think it's appropiate to set limits?
0
-
FurianoSoul ShrivenYes, it's just what I'm talking about. Four players with the same class should not be able to play together in a bg group.0
-
brandonv516✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭Yes, it's just what I'm talking about. Four players with the same class should not be able to play together in a bg group.
What if one is a Magplar healer, 2 are Magplar DPS, and 1 is a Stamplar DPS?
How well does a queue go through with matchmaking this stringent? It would be ridiculous.0 -
Solariken✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Wait till you have to fight 8 sorcs and 2 pets, all running antronarch Ulta with shadowrend monster sets ... Then come back to me
Haha yep! I've been in several games against more pets than players. What a circus that is.0 -
GreenHere✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭I can't see any immediate problem with a single-class team in BG (or elsewhere). In fact, I'd like to be a part of such matches, just to check it out!
DKs vs NBs vs Wardens!
NBs vs Templars vs Sorcs
SORCS vs SORCS vs SORCS !!
Sounds like it might be fun, honestly. I'd like to actually see how it plays before recommending implementing yet more restrictions into the game.1 -
GreenHere✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Oooh, oooh! NIGHTBLADE ONLY BGs!!
Hide and go Kill
Sign me up, just for the lols1 -
Minno✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭This is now a pet party!Minno - DC - Forum-plar Extraordinaire
- Guild-lead for MV
- Filthy Casual0 -
FurianoSoul ShrivenMatchmaking is already ridiculous, it sucks anyway.
And 4 sorcs with 8 pets are even more ridiculous.
0
