Four templars?

Furiano

For you, is it normal to fight vs 4 templars and 4 nightblades in a bg?
Don't you think it's appropiate to set limits?

DeadlyRecluse

TEMPLARMY!

Furiano wrote: »

Don't you think it's appropiate to set limits?

No, not really.

SugaComa

Wait till you have to fight 8 sorcs and 2 pets, all running antronarch Ulta with shadowrend monster sets ... Then come back to me

Furiano

Yes, it's just what I'm talking about. Four players with the same class should not be able to play together in a bg group.

brandonv516

Furiano wrote: »

Yes, it's just what I'm talking about. Four players with the same class should not be able to play together in a bg group.

What if one is a Magplar healer, 2 are Magplar DPS, and 1 is a Stamplar DPS?

How well does a queue go through with matchmaking this stringent? It would be ridiculous.

Solariken

SugaComa wrote: »

Wait till you have to fight 8 sorcs and 2 pets, all running antronarch Ulta with shadowrend monster sets ... Then come back to me

Haha yep! I've been in several games against more pets than players. What a circus that is.

Baconlad

Omg...12 Sorcs. Four pets each...

48 pets....
O. M. G

GreenHere

I can't see any immediate problem with a single-class team in BG (or elsewhere). In fact, I'd like to be a part of such matches, just to check it out!

DKs vs NBs vs Wardens!
NBs vs Templars vs Sorcs

SORCS vs SORCS vs SORCS !!


Sounds like it might be fun, honestly. I'd like to actually see how it plays before recommending implementing yet more restrictions into the game.

GreenHere

Oooh, oooh! NIGHTBLADE ONLY BGs!!

Hide and go Kill

Sign me up, just for the lols

Minno

This is now a pet party!

Furiano

Matchmaking is already ridiculous, it sucks anyway.
And 4 sorcs with 8 pets are even more ridiculous.

Aeslief

Furiano wrote: »

Yes, it's just what I'm talking about. Four players with the same class should not be able to play together in a bg group.

Why not?