RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »First DLC and expansions is excluded. If not WOW is among the worst P2W games out there,RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »Lets have a common sense and logical discussion shall we:
1. What is Pay to Win?"In some multiplayer free-to-play games, players who are willing to pay for special items or downloadable content may be able to gain a significant advantage over those playing for free. Critics of such games call them "pay-to-win" (p2w) games. A common suggestion for avoiding pay-to-win is that payments should only be used to broaden the experience without affecting gameplay."
- Wikipedia
We have this already with Orsinium, either you have the Orsinium DLC or the BIS weapons for most PVP and many PVE setups (VMA weapons) are locked behind a paywall.
With the Maw of Lorkhaj Trial added in the Thieves Guild DLC, the absolute BIS gear, Jewelry, etc for trials and PVE DPS is again hidden behind a paywall....if you want the absolute BIS items you have to have those two DLC's(Pay a Sub or Buy them) and if you PVP against people who access to these weapons(because they bought the content) you are at a significant disadvantage. This = P2W no matter how many of you ZOS apologists want to try and spin it....the Definition is as clear as Crystal Water.
Introducing BIS gear locked behind paywalls called DLC or expansions are just P2W philosophies people have accepted, it doesn't make them any less P2W....they are just accepted forms of P2W."Pay To Win. When you are paying for advantage which normal players don't have access to unless they either pay too or will have to grind very long (weeks and months)."
- Urban Dictionary
The Horse feeding Crown Store items is flat out a blatant example of this. It would take 180 days to max out Speed, Carry Capacity, and Stamina on a horse if you only feed your horse once a day with in-game gold. That's nearly 6 months....a person with subs crowns can reduce this significantly, and a person who is willing to spend the money can avoid the horse feeding grinding completely. As insignificant as many will come on here and claim this is, your playing right into the hand ZOS wants. Crown Store Horse feeding may be an insignificant P2W mechanic, but its P2W nontheless. Simply because it allows you to bypass the 180 days it would take to normally max out a horse, thus your paying money to avoid a grind an otherwise non-paying player would have to grind.
Its the same with the XP bonus Subs get, and the increased XP bonus of Crown Scrolls over the makeable EX Buff potions, the Craft Bag...again it may be an insignificant P2W mechanic, but its still P2W nontheless.
The only questions left is:
Can you live or accept these P2W elements?
Do these P2W elements effect your game play personally
There is no right or wrong answer to the two questions above. Everyone has to be their own man or woman and make their own decisions.
I personally no longer sub and only play on and off to PVP with friends and even that is less and less these days. However, that's just my personal preference, and everyone needs to do what they enjoy.
Im just not a big fan of those brushing off clear P2W mechanics that fit the definition of P2W just because its insignificant them...that's what they do in Washington.... its called kicking the can down the curb....what might not be important to you may be important to someone else, so please try to have a little bit of understanding.
Why?
If you don't buy the expansion you don't get access to the new levels and new gear, you will do 1/10 of the damage of other and take 10x as much damage.
You can still do the old stuff but all endgame moves to the new.
Yes, WOW is one of the worst P2W offenders because they duped their player base into accepting it.
AGAIN, expansions are NOT exempt, they are simply P2W things large player bases have been duped into accepting. Solid marketing strategies and talking about how insignificant it is in return for content sold it hook, line, and sinker.
PT Barnum said it best:
"there is a sucker born every minute"
MMO's are a prime example of the truth behind this statement.
Just because a P2W mechanic(Expansions) no matter how insignificant they are, are accepted doesn't make them any less P2W.....
Folks are really just arguing over semantics now
VMA and Maw = BIS slot weapons for PVP and PVE
If you don't buy that content and complete them, then you are at a disadvantage. Even if its a insignificant advantage, its still an advantage that you have to pay for which is P2W no matter how insignificant is.
Again, im done arguing...the definitions are clear to anyone who wants to look them up. There is always going to be those who defend the compnay line no matter what, and those who will bash the compnay line no matter what.
I sit firmly in the middle...i have cackled ZOS on stuff that I don't agree with, and have praised them on stuff they do well. I do my best to remain objective. The game still has some fun elements to it, and hasn't pushed the P2W envelope far enough for me personally to care, but to say P2W elements don't exist already in the game is simply being disingenuous.
Eh, semantics will always be semantics.
To me, the only way to win is to first have a competition.
In PvE, there is no true competition. You may have a higher "deeps" than me. You may have more costumes than me or a bigger house. You may have even leveled to CP cap faster than me. It doesn't matter because I don't care, there is no competition. You cannot "win" against yourself.
PvP is the only place in this game where you can win. You are actually competing against other players. I personally don't PvP in this game except for the occasional duel, so I can't really say if the "BiS" weapons and gear behind the Wrothgar and other DLC pay walls give you an advantage.
With that being said, 90% of ESO's game content is PvE and can't be P2W, IMO. If you are only here to play 10% of the game and PvP, you are doing it all wrong. That's not how MMORPGs work.
Idk, maybe try Battlefield, For Honor, something else PvP centric?
I think the OP continues to make these threads is because he is doing the exact definition of INSANITY, "Doing the same thing over and over hoping for a different result." He is hoping more people come in and agree with him, so by creating different threads he's hoping to attract different people... which of course goes back to the definition of insanity, because the exact same people are still here... which means, same thing, same results.
THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »I think the OP continues to make these threads is because he is doing the exact definition of INSANITY, "Doing the same thing over and over hoping for a different result." He is hoping more people come in and agree with him, so by creating different threads he's hoping to attract different people... which of course goes back to the definition of insanity, because the exact same people are still here... which means, same thing, same results.
Ironically that is not the actual definition of insanity. Insanity literally means "the state of being mentally ill".
But since the OP doesn't believe in literal definitions, good point!
Oh trust me.. you're not the only one. My eyes are bleeding from some of the things he said.The shear ridiculousness of this comment has triggered me
RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »
THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »I think the OP continues to make these threads is because he is doing the exact definition of INSANITY, "Doing the same thing over and over hoping for a different result." He is hoping more people come in and agree with him, so by creating different threads he's hoping to attract different people... which of course goes back to the definition of insanity, because the exact same people are still here... which means, same thing, same results.
Ironically that is not the actual definition of insanity. Insanity literally means "the state of being mentally ill".
But since the OP doesn't believe in literal definitions, good point!
That depends on if you take the psychologists definition or Albert Einstein's.