Maintenance for the week of January 5:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – January 5
• NA megaservers for maintenance – January 7, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 10:00AM EST (15:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for maintenance – January 7, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 10:00AM EST (15:00 UTC)

No more crown crates

  • Brunoad
    Brunoad
    ✭✭✭
    davey1107 wrote: »
    But playing RNG with people's real money, and especially with kids' real money, utterly, utterly sucks.

    I so agree. This is one of the most shameful things I have seen Zenimax do so far.
  • xboxone1Q
    xboxone1Q
    ✭✭✭
    No more nightblades
  • necronomniconb14_ESO
    Brunoad wrote: »
    davey1107 wrote: »
    But playing RNG with people's real money, and especially with kids' real money, utterly, utterly sucks.

    I so agree. This is one of the most shameful things I have seen Zenimax do so far.

    Careful, the Zyngamax can hack into your stagecoach and run you into a wayshrine.
  • DaveMoeDee
    DaveMoeDee
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    Darkstorne wrote: »
    EvilCroc wrote: »
    No! More crown crates!
    It is fun.

    Just to clarify, you prefer handing over more money for the chance at getting a mount you want, rather than handing over less money for exactly the mount you want?

    You've got to differentiate here.
    - If people buy crates in the hope to get some particular specific item "cheap", then they're seeing it wrong and get scammed. We should warn them and explain again and again.
    - If people are buying crates for the thrill of opening them, then they're purchasing exactly what is offered and it's their choice and freedom, we've got no right to tell them what they should or shouldn't spend their money on.

    Agreed. So no one buying crates should waste our time with posts complaining about getting crap. Because that is what they are. I am fine with people going to Vegas for a thrill or buying scratch tickets for fun. But I am against the government running lotteries and advertising them. The government shouldn't be in the business of taking advantage of people's gambling problems. I'm fine with ZOS doing it though. I am fine with feeding the whales to keep the game healthy while I spend minimally on the game.
  • ThePonzzz
    ThePonzzz
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    61674384.jpg
  • DaveMoeDee
    DaveMoeDee
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    Hanokihs wrote: »
    davey1107 wrote: »
    @Hanokihs I don't understand the screwing yourself out of a wolf. If you'd gone in and bought more gems...whatever...could you have kept drawing? Or did running out in the middle erase that draw?

    I thought I was done opening crates, but when I started buying things with gems, I noticed I had too many crowns left. I had intended to use 75 crates , just in case of lucky draws, but only used 60. Naturally it's cheaper to just pull the mount you want instead of getting it the alternate way, and when I started on my last set of 15, the first mount I pulled was the wolf I had just bought. Even though I got two other things I would have purchased with gems, that wolf card was a waste of 400.

    I don't understand. How could you have too many crowns left? You are saying you bought 60 (not "used") instead of 75? And then you still bought 15 more despite already buying wolf? If you just failed to use them all, that would not affect your crown balance.
  • Hanokihs
    Hanokihs
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    DaveMoeDee wrote: »
    Hanokihs wrote: »
    davey1107 wrote: »
    @Hanokihs I don't understand the screwing yourself out of a wolf. If you'd gone in and bought more gems...whatever...could you have kept drawing? Or did running out in the middle erase that draw?

    I thought I was done opening crates, but when I started buying things with gems, I noticed I had too many crowns left. I had intended to use 75 crates , just in case of lucky draws, but only used 60. Naturally it's cheaper to just pull the mount you want instead of getting it the alternate way, and when I started on my last set of 15, the first mount I pulled was the wolf I had just bought. Even though I got two other things I would have purchased with gems, that wolf card was a waste of 400.

    I don't understand. How could you have too many crowns left? You are saying you bought 60 (not "used") instead of 75? And then you still bought 15 more despite already buying wolf? If you just failed to use them all, that would not affect your crown balance.

    I'm just peculiar about my budget; every season, I'm allowing myself 75. Buying X Crates and using them all increases my chances of pulling the items I want without exchanging gems for them; getting lucky is the cheaper value, which is why it's a gamble in the first place.

    I bought the wolf before realizing that I hadn't bought/opened all the Crates I allow myself, and there were other items I'd been about to spend the gems for. Opening 15 more crates prevented me from having to exchange gems for another mount, two pets, and a Hircine statue, which was great for me, because I now have a few hundred gems left over for the next season (instead of the almost-none I would've had otherwise). It would've been even better had I noticed sooner and not spent 400 gems on the wild hunt wolf, because I pulled that card as well; but it's whatever. I'll just be more careful and double-check my budgeted money, next time.

    That's the thing about these crates. If you're looking to pull specific things, you may well be pulling forever. But if you limit the number you purchase/open, and then buy what you weren't lucky enough to obtain, there's a better chance you'll come out ahead of the curve. Relatively speaking, I guess. I'm sure it's still a ripoff, but I didn't spend nearly as many crowns as I otherwise probably would have on buying each item individually.
    "I haven't really played much yet, but lemme tell you all about how the game should include X and be a lot more like Y!" - Half the posters on this forum.
    "I've been here for years, and lemme tell you all about how they should never change or evolve Z, because then the game would be ruined forever." - The other half of posters on this forum.
  • Molydeus
    Molydeus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    JWKe wrote: »
    Oh and here is a link to the legal gambling age in the U.S. The consensus seem to be 18+, and 21+ in the gambling capital of Nevada.

    https://www.casino.org/us/guide/

    This means nothing. Crown crates do not reward real money, therefore they aren't considered real gambling by anyone important. They are fluff gambling for pixels, and nobody who's anybody cares about that. It may be a fine line but that's how it is.
  • STEVIL
    STEVIL
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    so let me get this straight...

    pay real money + enbgage in activity + random chance at value of reward = gambling.
    17+ rating means children of 17 may be playing.
    there fore, letting 17+ YO buy crown crates pay for a sub and use their game time to run VMA or VDSA and get the seriously problematic RNG reward at the end is bad bad bad business practice evil or whatever marketing nasty.

    Right?

    this is all about protecting 17+ YO children from the evils of being allowed to do crown crates VMA/VDSA?

    Struck thru crown crates when i recalled they were just for fun cosmetic stuff not like the actual boon to competitive play the RNG for the arenas is.

    I could maybe get behind banning those at age 17 from doing any of the RNG rewards stuff until they turn 18 but not if its just the fluffy cosmetic RNG stuff.
    Proudly skooma free while talks-when-drunk is in mandatory public housing.
    YFMV Your Fun May Vary.

    First Law of Nerf-o-Dynamics
    "The good way I used to get good kills *with good skill* was good but the way others kill me now is bad."

  • Aelthwyn
    Aelthwyn
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I totally agree that it's a very 'low' system and it's sad to see them use something that for some people can become a serious problem - whether those people are minors or not. It just seems in poor taste. It's disappointing to see them putting such great design work into something that is clearly a cash grab and which many players are opposed to or will not have the luck to enjoy. Sure they need money to keep creating the game, but the crate system seems to reach new lows of bad value for the money spent, and over time the less you feel it's worthwhile the less you're going to spend (unless you have the compulsion to gamble, which.... this is kind of like praying on people with an illness. And yes I know some people gamble responsibly. still... it's just not a very respectable business model if you ask me).

    I admit that I know nothing about marketing and financing and all that, but it seems to me that while the few with money to burn on crates may make up for all those who won't spend money on things without a fixed price, there is another loss they perhaps haven't taken into account - the loss of many player's sense of satisfaction with the game and crown store. The psychology of the whole system sews a lot more negatives than positives. It makes players frustrated, and while that frustration may compel some of them to keep trying to 'win', even once they have if it took a lot of crates to reach that they're likely to feel a bit bitter. It makes players jealous of others who 'get lucky' (even if that apex mount wasn't one they actually wanted), and this doesn't foster a positive community. A few people might feel like they got a great deal, but I doubt that's the majority. While plenty of people would likely still be a bit bitter if they sold these new items for a straight high price, it seems to me the overall feeling would tend more towards the positive, focusing more around how excited people are about the great new designs minus the feeling of being taunted and slapped in the face by RNG. The more disenchanted you make your players the more they're going to look elsewhere or invest even less in the game...

    Up till now I pretty much bought everything I really wanted from the crown store, though there wasn't always much that interested me. Now, there are a lot of things I would definitely have bought straight out in the last crate season and this one, but now I'm getting used to going without because I'm not going to support this sleazy system. I think the whole thing is really sad
  • Kesstryl
    Kesstryl
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    My main gripe with them is really cool things that I might have bought from the cash shop are now locked behind a gambling wall, and I will not waste money trying to get lucky for something I may or may not get. I don't have that kind of cash to spend just to get lucky. I would rather buy something directly from the cash shop. Also these crown crates have driven up direct cash shop purchase prices. Special mounts used to be in the 2k range, now they are in the 4k range? WTH? These changes to using the crown store have really left me feeling raw.
    HEARTHLIGHT - A guild for housing enthusiasts! Contact @Kesstryl in-game to join.
  • Malborn66
    Malborn66
    ✭✭✭
    My response to this is that while I can feel that this is a sad gambling style strategy from ZOS, there is nothing that makes me buy crates. I have not and will not play the ZOS Crates gambling game.

    I will find a use for my Crowns and it will not be purchasing crates.

    8 Characters, All Alliances, Lvl 50 301 CP
    PC-EU
  • ProfesseurFreder
    ProfesseurFreder
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would rather pay a somewhat high price for something that I know I want than spend any amount on a "grab bag" or crown crate. Why? Because I learned when I was a little kid that I never get anything I want out of those things.

    Give me the opportunity to buy what I want OUTRIGHT, and you've got a customer. Make me buy "Mystery Boxes" and you will not get ONE SINGLE PENNY out of me. Sorry.
    "Nothing by which all human passion and hope and folly can be mirrored and then proved ever was just a game."
    -- William Faulkner.
  • Banana
    Banana
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    There's no stopping them now. To many mugs buy them
  • SupaSane
    SupaSane
    ✭✭✭
    Disagree, no one is forcing you to buy these cosmetic items. I'd like to see this game add more expansions and what not and I have no problem giving them money to support a game I enjoy. Also I do not see how this is gambling for minors, you need a credit/debit card to buy these items and I doubt any minor is rocking a credit/debit.
    SupaSane - PC / NA
    Canthion - Bosmer Stamina Nightblade [DC]
    Saviör - Orc Stamina Dragonknight [DC]
    So-No-Head - Argonian Magicka Templar [DC]
    Lord Savioro - Nord Stamina Necromancer [DC]

    "So do all who live to see such times but that is not for them to decide, All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you." -Gandalf
  • Stopnaggin
    Stopnaggin
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Bottom line, imho. Children have no bearing on this argument. Parents decide what their children do. Gambling laws do not apply, you are not gambling with real money and not recieving real money. You are not directly purchasing crates with money, you buy crowns with real money, you can then gamble that virtual currency on crates. Gambling yes, illegal no. Multitudes of casino games on phones and facebook. No outrage.

    Chinese laws do not apply, I personally don't care what the Chinese do. Those laws are not in place to protect their citizens, and if you believe otherwise you are sadly mistaken. Those laws are in place to keep their money in their country. Bringing in a communist governments policy is a far stretch to anything here. That government does not respect it's citizens, they are slave labor. So I would rather have the choice of gambling or not, compared to having no rights at all. BUT by all means feel free to move there if you think it's a better society.
  • Thealteregoroman
    Thealteregoroman
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Me when new crown crates are released.......


    giphy.gif
    ****Master Healer...****
  • necronomniconb14_ESO
    Stopnaggin wrote: »
    Bottom line, imho. Children have no bearing on this argument. Parents decide what their children do. Gambling laws do not apply, you are not gambling with real money and not recieving real money. You are not directly purchasing crates with money, you buy crowns with real money, you can then gamble that virtual currency on crates. Gambling yes, illegal no. Multitudes of casino games on phones and facebook. No outrage.

    Chinese laws do not apply, I personally don't care what the Chinese do. Those laws are not in place to protect their citizens, and if you believe otherwise you are sadly mistaken. Those laws are in place to keep their money in their country. Bringing in a communist governments policy is a far stretch to anything here. That government does not respect it's citizens, they are slave labor. So I would rather have the choice of gambling or not, compared to having no rights at all. BUT by all means feel free to move there if you think it's a better society.

    Their governmental structure doesn't matter, the law is one that is still beneficial for the gamers. Plain and simple. I will check those values, assume the odds have been made a tad better for Chinese gamers because of the law, and then decide flatout whether to play games or not based on the assumption. I thank the Chinese Government for this law, they have been much more consumer-friendly than my own government in recent years ironicly. On a personal level, anyways. They may save myself a lot of time and money both come May and moving forward. Good Guy China xoxo

    P.S. Threads look much more clean once I ignore the shills and snobs on the board lol
    Edited by necronomniconb14_ESO on 15 March 2017 20:03
  • MadLarkin
    MadLarkin
    ✭✭✭✭
    Its not the job of game developers/movie makers/musicians to protect children from harmful material. That is what parents are for. I am, however, 100% against gambling crates because I think game developers should simply treat their customers with more respect than that.
  • SydneyGrey
    SydneyGrey
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    DaveMoeDee wrote: »
    So no one buying crates should waste our time with posts complaining about getting crap.
    Yet if everyone who bought crates said only 100% positive things about them, someone here would whine that they're being "fanboys" or "ESO shills," or some other nonsense. I think people can enjoy the crates for what they are, and still have a healthy discussion about it that isn't 100% positive fanboying/fangirling.

  • davey1107
    davey1107
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    @Molydeus You're correct that one legal argument in favor of a scheme like this is that the rewards have no real value, therefore it's not gambling. The courts have sided with this on occasion. However, the counter argument would be that the definition of "having value" is whether people are willing to exchange real money for something. Because there is a thriving market for the same items given as crate rewards, it can be shown that they do have value. Beside which, a game designer would NEVER go to court with the argument that digital programming doesn't have value...duh. "We all just copied the game code and distributed it...because ZOS testified it doesn't have value."

    @Aelthwyn I think your point brings the conversation back to center. I wanted a cloud leopard senche in the previous crate campaign. (I didn't participate at all due to the system). I was willing to spend $25 on this mount...barely...but only on this particular item. If I'd spent and drawn a camel...or a bunch of idiotic hats...I would have felt ripped off and pissed every single time I saw those in my collections. I still feel a little ripped off because I wasn't afforded the opportunity to buy the mount without risking the loss. This is why I've personally decided to stop all crown purchases until,the crates are gone.

    @MadLarkin Your argument ignores the distinction between game developers having a freedom of speech, and of game developers to have the freedom to conduct specific activities in their business practices. The courts have ruled that games are protected as an art and cultural expression of speech. So developers don't have to protect kids from violent imagery. But the manner they take payment and distribute products isn't protected by the same laws, and that argument doesn't apply.
  • SydneyGrey
    SydneyGrey
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    davey1107 wrote: »
    ...So developers don't have to protect kids from violent imagery.
    In my country they do, but only in the form of a game ratings system. (ESO is rated "M" for "mature," as we know) But then it's up to the parent to keep their kids away from anything too violent.
    It's also up to the parents to not give their kids a credit card, so they can't charge a huge amount of money on things like crown crates.

  • davey1107
    davey1107
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    @SydneyGrey In the U.S. the courts ruled the ratings system voluntary, but game companies are pretty compliant since it gets parents to mostly shut up and doesn't affect sales, lol. (Often it bolsters them).

    People often use credit cards as an argument to say that children are protected, but those people are woefully uninformed, and we'd hope none are business owners. Because the courts have rejected this argument for decades. Companies cannot use the fact that a credit card number is used for purchase as age verification, because minors have access to credit card numbers from a variety of sources. Any ATM card will also be a credit card payment method, and you can walk into any grocery store in America and buy a gift card with cash that will have a visa or MasterCard number. Or a PSN card, which would allow the purchase of crowns without any credit card number involved at all.

    Companies actually have to be very careful in doing business with minors. The argument "it's up to the parents" never flies in court, and minors are not bound by contracts like an adult is. Often it's not that minors need protection from companies, but that companies need protection from minors...who in many cases could consume a good or service then get out of any contractual obligations associated with it.

  • Stopnaggin
    Stopnaggin
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Stopnaggin wrote: »
    Bottom line, imho. Children have no bearing on this argument. Parents decide what their children do. Gambling laws do not apply, you are not gambling with real money and not recieving real money. You are not directly purchasing crates with money, you buy crowns with real money, you can then gamble that virtual currency on crates. Gambling yes, illegal no. Multitudes of casino games on phones and facebook. No outrage.

    Chinese laws do not apply, I personally don't care what the Chinese do. Those laws are not in place to protect their citizens, and if you believe otherwise you are sadly mistaken. Those laws are in place to keep their money in their country. Bringing in a communist governments policy is a far stretch to anything here. That government does not respect it's citizens, they are slave labor. So I would rather have the choice of gambling or not, compared to having no rights at all. BUT by all means feel free to move there if you think it's a better society.

    Their governmental structure doesn't matter, the law is one that is still beneficial for the gamers. Plain and simple. I will check those values, assume the odds have been made a tad better for Chinese gamers because of the law, and then decide flatout whether to play games or not based on the assumption. I thank the Chinese Government for this law, they have been much more consumer-friendly than my own government in recent years ironicly. On a personal level, anyways. They may save myself a lot of time and money both come May and moving forward. Good Guy China xoxo

    P.S. Threads look much more clean once I ignore the shills and snobs on the board lol

    @Good Guy China

    Is eso even allowed in China? My understanding was that in order to even get outside access to the internet, you had to use illegal methods. As I do not live there myself I can not say for sure, but they seem to be a very closed society. Well maybe Hong Kong being an exception as is still seems very westernized. I have met a few Chinese people in my time and most tell bad stories, with regard to living and working conditions. Censorship out of control, but this has been years ago so it may have changed some.
  • Eirikir
    Eirikir
    ✭✭✭✭
    I love the gambling angle, as if some random kids on a videogame know more then a large company's legal department.

    You guys know by law its only gambling if you can convert your winnings into the same medium as the seed right? Its only gambling in the eyes of the law if I can trade that riding lesson in for $10 bucks.
    Server: PS4-NA
    PSN: Eirikir
    Name: Eirikir "Erik" Kololf
    Alliance: Ebonheart Pact
    Race: Nord (Lycanthrope)
    Class: Dragonknight (Range DPS)
    Playstyle: Crafter, PVE, PVP, Roleplayer
  • Heroeric1337
    Heroeric1337
    ✭✭✭
    The biggest arguement seems centered around minors spending money

    Personally, money management is something that needs to be learned at a young age. Either through your family, or through hardships in life. If a kid decides to spend his/her money on a video game to obtain somthing through gambling, and they dont get what they want, they learn the hard way the consequences of gambling. It sucks, but their gonna learn at some point in their life, might as well start at a time where they are most succeptible to learn.
  • Stewart1874
    Stewart1874
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't have a problem with them. As mentioned the 'whales' keep things ticking over and allows ZOS to keep going.

    My complaint is the shite stuff in the crownstore. I have 6,400 crowns (stopped playing but cba'd cancelling my sub) but none of the stuff is worth buying (IMO). Lets get some decent outfits and polymorphs released.
    PS4 - Europe - Aldmeri Dominion
  • SydneyGrey
    SydneyGrey
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    davey1107 wrote: »
    ...and you can walk into any grocery store in America and buy a gift card with cash that will have a visa or MasterCard number. Or a PSN card, which would allow the purchase of crowns without any credit card number involved at all.
    True. You have a good point, there.

  • Valkesh
    Valkesh
    Soul Shriven
    So I don't come to the forums typically, but this has been bugging me, so I'm going to say my piece, leave, and probably not check back. Throwing it here because making yet another thread about this would be more self indulgent than this is already going to be.

    Let me preface this with a few things. I understand that, not a word printed here is going to mean a damn thing in this matter and I'm not here to change peoples minds. Minds are made up. Official forums are basically a very nicely designed place for people to vent and feel like they actually did something about whatever it is they're complaining about. I also understand that the people turning the screws are not the same people putting blood and sweat into the game. Business aside, I'm sure the people actually putting the work in just care about the game.

    That said: I hate crown crates. I really do. Playing MMOs from their early inception, these kind of RNG box systems were something once associated with poorly translated F2P grinders shipped in from the Korean cafe environment. Sadly, over time and with the rise of f2p supplanting subscriptions in the MMO market (mostly due to over-saturation and dramatically increased competition), this system has not only found it's way into the mainstream western MMO market but also AAA gaming in general (but that's another story). It's a consumer unfriendly system at best and a deeply predatory one at worst; preying on people with low impulse control, gambling addictions, and catering to those with high levels of disposable income on the slightly more ethical end.

    The common response is always the same. Every time. "But it's OPTIONAL! They're COSMETIC! You don't HAVE to buy it so it's fine!" I can understand why this comes up. I can understand why someone who only cares for stats would see something like cosmetics as something ineffectual. That people who play games extremely casually would not understand the impact these kind of business decisions have on overall game design and market direction. I can understand it, even if they are categorically wrong in every respect. The easiest things to point to are shifts in design from rewarding players for in-game achievements to rewarding them for "spending" and shifts away from more static/one-time payment models to ongoing/perpetual payment models with no upper limit. Those are the obvious ones, but the changes go deeper than that, and they will vary from company to company, implementation to implementation. But at the end of the day, to many people, going from being able to quietly enjoy your time and play the game to playing the game with an ever present open hand waiting expectantly next to you is not a welcome one.

    For all of this though, I can say one thing with certainty. Crown crates are not going away. As much as any number of us may want them to, they are here to stay so long as they are legally permissible. The fact of the matter is that because of the outrageous returns they pull in, as a nominal amount of effort can result in a potentially unlimited amount of return, no amount of boycotting will be effective. A single whale, a single addict, a single Youtube/Twitch channel doing a "LETS UNBOX 25 CROWN CRATES" video (which pays for itself in ad revenue), will more than justify their existence. Even if EVERYONE stopped buying a single box today, there are two known seasons upcoming which I'm certain are already in development, which means we would see, bare minimum, 6 more months of pushing them AFTER this existing season. I'm not saying "give up, go buy some crowns and boxes I guess!", I'm saying that it takes so little action to justify them, that no amount of inaction will stop them. At best, you can continue to express your disappointment and preference for fixed/subscription payment methods, but it will likely always be in tandem with these boxes, and there will always be a disparity of items that are available. It is still worth mentioning however, as silence and acceptance is what brought these things as norms in the industry to begin with. Who knows, maybe the system might at least improve. Maybe it keeps things from getting worse.

    Maybe it just gets it off your chest.
  • klowdy1
    klowdy1
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just throwing this out there, highest level is a 43 more stamplar. Out of 5 crates (only ones I've ever bought) I got the wild hunt bear mount, wild hunt tiger mount, banekin let, Brazil retriever pet, forester' s hood, antler face tattoo, and east skyrim scout outfit, along with a few other random things I traded for crown gems, or saved for later use ( like exp scrolls and mimic stones). Sometimes gambling pays off. Also, not sure if it was part of an achievement or if I won this too, but I have a bright lime green costume dye.
Sign In or Register to comment.