Move it to Romania. We have great internet here.

I would like the EU Megaserver moved to the fabled and mystical `Lag Free Megaserver` land of what was spoke of in the misty ancient past of 2013.

They say all legends have a grain of truth, no matter how fantastical, but in this case of lag free megaserver tech, its 99.99% unlikely

Its not the problem where the server stands, the server is the problem...

You really think frankfurt is a bad place for internet? you should check some facts before asking such questions

I_killed_Vivec wrote: »

Why do you think Great Britain has a better internet service?

The location is almost irrelevant. It's the service that needs to be improved - the resilience of the EU server, the capability for technicians to get it back up in a timely manner, and the ability of customer service representatives to keep us informed.

And make us think that we aren't waiting on US tech staff to get out of bed.

Well I think they still have a lot of folks from Great Briton that play this. Plus Before Brexit the us would go through Great Briton so it might have been easier for them to have moved the servers there. I imagine they would have more advanced equipment more compatible with Us technology. Plus I imagine there would be faster results if the server was located there since a lot of those that play this basically speak mostly english. I don't know how things are in the eu but I know they do things differently most likely which makes it harder for them.

Move it to Sweden. Sweden have very good internet, servers and technicians.

Lava_Croft wrote: »

Moving the server to a third world country like Great Britain doesn't seem like a smart idea.

Maybe Pluto would be better, hell, I doubt it would be worse than it already is...

If any BF players are here, you could connect to US servers on a full 64 player Conquest map, with tons of more stuff going on than in any intense battle in ESO and the latency would way less.

Lag free Megaserver, lol, just lol

Move the eu megaserver to a place with better internet.



http://imgur.com/a/uJIcp

It matters also the configuration and other hardware connected to the server . They need some "Blades" ..or maybe something better ...

To Sweden, Finland or Romania.

SHADOW2KK wrote: »

If any BF players are here, you could connect to US servers on a full 64 player Conquest map, with tons of more stuff going on than in any intense battle in ESO and the latency would way less.

uuumm.....no

I just want it to work

But hey, if they want to put the EU server in Barcelona next to the Camp Nou I'm in xD

Any country is not better than USA in server management technologies.USA is the number one in this business.Mega server management is a serious business . I think Germany has not enough resources for management Zos's mega server.

SHADOW2KK wrote: »

smokey13a wrote: »

SHADOW2KK wrote: »

If any BF players are here, you could connect to US servers on a full 64 player Conquest map, with tons of more stuff going on than in any intense battle in ESO and the latency would way less.

uuumm.....no

Um yeah you could and still can, on PC, dont know what platform your on.

Could go on and really explain it, but I really cba.

Point remains, on that game, a lot more stuff happens on screen, so ESO has no excuse.

you do realize that the ESO servers have to deal with like a thousand times the data, im sorry and don't want to offend you but if you don't understand why you cant even compare Bf to ESO then you clearly have no understanding of how games are made.

smokey13a wrote: »

SHADOW2KK wrote: »

smokey13a wrote: »

SHADOW2KK wrote: »

If any BF players are here, you could connect to US servers on a full 64 player Conquest map, with tons of more stuff going on than in any intense battle in ESO and the latency would way less.

uuumm.....no

Um yeah you could and still can, on PC, dont know what platform your on.

Could go on and really explain it, but I really cba.

Point remains, on that game, a lot more stuff happens on screen, so ESO has no excuse.

you do realize that the ESO servers have to deal with like a thousand times the data, im sorry and don't want to offend you but if you don't understand why you cant even compare Bf to ESO then you clearly have no understanding of how games are made.

LOL, dedi servers on the BF games deal with a lot more data, constant warfare, with game tech that will always be in advance of ESO, which can barely handle a few players on screen at once,

ESO has server farms, with a strongly marketed lag free megaserver, which to be polite, has been problematic, so their tech should have been way more advanced to put other games, other genres to shame, they cant, and they never will unless they put in the millions needed to finally materialise the crap they came out with to make many people buy it in the first place.

Its called misinformation and lying in some circles

And lets look at some issues, the transitus shrines in keeps, have superfluous menders and other magickal users just casting constantly, all that puts a drain on the systems, when there is no need for it, back a long time ago, they got rid of deer from Cyro, thinking it would make a difference.

Now lets look at BF, and thousands of bullets and shells and full war going on, buildings getting blow to smithereens, masses of decals and particle effects, now lets look at a typical battle in Cyro now, massive difference,

I am fully aware that the ESO servers have to deal with a lot of complex series of packet flows, but it cant handle it, then the latency goes up, cos of a lot of superflous crap like the healers I mentioned at the transitus shrines in keeps, thus why they want you to spread out, so the servers can deal with the load, it should anyways.