danno816_ESO wrote: »It has been tested. By me personally not just 2 weeks ago.
In human form you get the stamina regeneration and none of the poison weakness.
There is currently only one reason to not be a WW in human form, and that is if you want to be a vampire.
danno816_ESO wrote: »It has been tested. By me personally not just 2 weeks ago.
In human form you get the stamina regeneration and none of the poison weakness.
There is currently only one reason to not be a WW in human form, and that is if you want to be a vampire.
Pretty sure there is more than one reason.
danno816_ESO wrote: »It has been tested. By me personally not just 2 weeks ago.
In human form you get the stamina regeneration and none of the poison weakness.
There is currently only one reason to not be a WW in human form, and that is if you want to be a vampire.
Pretty sure there is more than one reason.
danno816_ESO wrote: »It has been tested. By me personally not just 2 weeks ago.
In human form you get the stamina regeneration and none of the poison weakness.
There is currently only one reason to not be a WW in human form, and that is if you want to be a vampire.
joshisanonymous wrote: »danno816_ESO wrote: »It has been tested. By me personally not just 2 weeks ago.
In human form you get the stamina regeneration and none of the poison weakness.
There is currently only one reason to not be a WW in human form, and that is if you want to be a vampire.
Ok, but you skipped the part where I asked if there was any kind of video proof or anything so that it's not just an issue with how you tested this or something like that. I've heard people say, "I've tested it I know," and then go on to describe something different than what someone else who also claimed to test it describes.
At the very least, could you explain how you tested this?
joshisanonymous wrote: »danno816_ESO wrote: »It has been tested. By me personally not just 2 weeks ago.
In human form you get the stamina regeneration and none of the poison weakness.
There is currently only one reason to not be a WW in human form, and that is if you want to be a vampire.
Ok, but you skipped the part where I asked if there was any kind of video proof or anything so that it's not just an issue with how you tested this or something like that. I've heard people say, "I've tested it I know," and then go on to describe something different than what someone else who also claimed to test it describes.
At the very least, could you explain how you tested this?
Davadin wrote:HOWEVER, FG skill... somehow i get critted with that damn evil hunter more often than now. not tested (probably its just me getting hit too many times in general) but sure feels that way.
The 9% damage increase doesn't hit Werewolves in human form. Tested and confirmed based on tooltip versus actual damage. For vampires the actual damage is higher than the tooltip.
As far as Silver Bolts and Evil hunter, I can only think of two times I've seen evil hunter in my death recap(it now has a chance to hit everyone) and I've never seen Dawnbreaker or Silver bolts in a death recap. I PvP enough that I'm 99.9% certain that none of them can hit a werewolf, especially given their high proc rates.
I think it is safe to assume that in this case the people who know, actually know. I test everything.
poison only in WW form. yes it's true. take it. too many of us tested this already.
HOWEVER, FG skill... somehow i get critted with that damn evil hunter more often than now. not tested (probably its just me getting hit too many times in general) but sure feels that way.
kendellking_chaosb14_ESO wrote: »No it's a 4% chance but that's with every hit and DoT tick so dropping two DoTs for me porcs it on just about everyone two DoTs downs and front loaded burst four to hit damage ticks and hits a second and camouflage Hunter with hit eventually