Maintenance for the week of November 18:
• [COMPLETE] ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – November 19, 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC) - 6:00PM EST (23:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: EU megaserver for maintenance – November 19, 23:00 UTC (6:00PM EST) - November 20, 17:00 UTC (12:00PM EST)
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/668861

Celarus AD and EP Emperor Farming

cjmarsh725b14_ESO
cjmarsh725b14_ESO
✭✭✭✭
Currently on this server both of these factions are actively working together (by whispering each other's leaders while in Cyrodiil) to take the inner ring of keeps so that each faction can crown new emperors quickly and repeatedly. For example, say it is EP's "turn". AD will take every keep owned by DC and then just leave the keeps they own for EP to take in their wake. They do this by zerging all the way around through DC, and when EP wipes all the npcs in the keep's AD owns, they'll have all the keeps to crown their emperor. And then the cycle reverses and continues.

This seems like an outright abuse of game mechanics and should be stopped immediately, in my opinion. It not only dilutes the achievement of emperor but turns off new pvpers who are looking for the real pvp experience that RvR is supposed to bring.

Is this something that is alright with you, or do you disagree with this practice?
  • Tintinabula
    Tintinabula
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes it bothers me..and I will be able to recognize these "faux emperors" easily when we pvp them. The usual way to get emp has been a long drawn out battle with a huge quantity of amassed AP not directly related to but having to do a little i think with pvp experience.(not this "drive through would you like fries with that crown?" bullcrap)

    Initially I was concerned about the influx of all these "emperor buffed" players but frankly the player makes the title..the title doesn't make the player.

    If they got their emperorship easily..it'll be fun to watch them drop like flies when they come up against truly seasoned players. ;)
    Edited by Tintinabula on 8 June 2014 07:13
  • TRIP233
    TRIP233
    ✭✭✭
    And you know they are whispering each other how?

    Maybe DC is mostly in a different campaign and they are under populated and EP and AD have more people in the campaign. It also depends on time zones.
  • cjmarsh725b14_ESO
    cjmarsh725b14_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭
    TRIP233 wrote: »
    And you know they are whispering each other how?

    Maybe DC is mostly in a different campaign and they are under populated and EP and AD have more people in the campaign. It also depends on time zones.
    I know they are whispering each other because I was doing well in a fight and the opposing leader whispered me thinking I was in charge and asking to let them have the keep so they could farm. It has nothing to do with time zones, the people in zone chat are openly coordinating the cycling of keeps to get emperor, it's not a secret in any way, shape, or form.
  • dafraorb16_ESO
    dafraorb16_ESO
    ✭✭✭
    time to fix/remove the former emperor passive
  • bruceb14_ESO5
    bruceb14_ESO5
    ✭✭✭
    Take out Celarus experiment and revise it. It is taking away from the other servers and is primarily a Farm. Zone Chat = LFG AP Farm have TS. When XP and AP are consequently lowered then everyone who did not abuse the system will QQ and those who abused it will make fun of them. We see this too often.
  • Satiar
    Satiar
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    As someone who PvPs on Celarus, I can tell you it's not any sort of collaboration.

    There is a certain AD guild who will remain nameless that tends to serverhop in order to get the Former Emp title for their players. Typically, when they are not online or on another server, EP on Celarus will take most of the map and crown an emperor. Than, the AD guild will come back and pretty much roll over the map, running two full groups of fairly coordinated players. They take Emp, farm for a bit, leave. And so the cycle goes.

    I have seen no evidence of collaborating, or players or guilds cooperating to change emperor. It's a matter of one Guild having a good bunch of players capable or running over the map (when the good EP guilds are not on or are not communicating well), and EP subsequently taking it back that guild is gone or the better EP guilds come on.

    Vehemence -- Commander and Raid Lead -- Tri-faction PvP
    Knights Paravant -- Co-GM and Raid Lead -- AD Greyhost



  • Tintinabula
    Tintinabula
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    just make it so your'e only former emperor on the campaign you got it..wanna be king of fools of a foolish campaign?..have at it.
  • TheGrandAlliance
    TheGrandAlliance
    ✭✭✭✭
    ..................
    Edited by TheGrandAlliance on 10 June 2014 16:51
    Indeed it is so...
  • Dleatherus
    Dleatherus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Satiar wrote: »
    As someone who PvPs on Celarus, I can tell you it's not any sort of collaboration.

    There is a certain AD guild who will remain nameless that tends to serverhop in order to get the Former Emp title for their players. Typically, when they are not online or on another server, EP on Celarus will take most of the map and crown an emperor. Than, the AD guild will come back and pretty much roll over the map, running two full groups of fairly coordinated players. They take Emp, farm for a bit, leave. And so the cycle goes.

    I have seen no evidence of collaborating, or players or guilds cooperating to change emperor. It's a matter of one Guild having a good bunch of players capable or running over the map (when the good EP guilds are not on or are not communicating well), and EP subsequently taking it back that guild is gone or the better EP guilds come on.

    you sir are mistaken - since we cannot name and shame here suffice it to say that it has been stated by the emperor farmers, in zone chat no less so plenty of folks witnessed it, that the AD emperor farmers have an arrangement with the EP emperor farmers also in on this 'game'

    the fact that when we have defended our AD keeps against EP and gotten /whispers of 'wtf you doing? you guys are supposed to let us take 'em right back' confirms this on so many levels

    those of us defending have been told NOT to pvp to allow the EP to retake the keeps

    oh and they 'server hop' as you put it SPECIFICALLY to let EP retake the keeps with little to no resistance - not even bothering to repair walls or doors, and once EP retakes them they conveniently 'server hop' back

    sugar coat the exploiting all ya will, those of you involved with it stink

    (the above comment not directed at you Satiar)

    D.
    Edited by Dleatherus on 8 June 2014 23:14
    Stands in Puddles VR12 NB
    Dleatherus VR10 Templar

    Emperor Farmers, cheaters and exploiters - just like cockroaches in real life, Tamriel will never be rid of them
  • The_Drexill
    The_Drexill
    ✭✭✭✭
    I'm DC, but I will say things on Celarus are weird. Generally when I go over there... I notice an EP keep on fire, and AD inside it... just standing there, they all look afk. They'll never take the keep, they all just stand there with the doors open.

    There's obviously something going on.
    Brandizzle - NB
    Drexill The Unbreakable - Sorc

    For teh covenant.
  • Tintinabula
    Tintinabula
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sorry,but they need to take away all those emperorships and rework that..500k ap to get emp is laughable.
  • Dleatherus
    Dleatherus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm DC, but I will say things on Celarus are weird. Generally when I go over there... I notice an EP keep on fire, and AD inside it... just standing there, they all look afk. They'll never take the keep, they all just stand there with the doors open.

    There's obviously something going on.

    this is so that our 'noble' emperor farmers can gain the AP reward for 'defending' the keep - it's usually the AD keep on fire and them standing there doing nothing

    D.
    Edited by Dleatherus on 8 June 2014 23:22
    Stands in Puddles VR12 NB
    Dleatherus VR10 Templar

    Emperor Farmers, cheaters and exploiters - just like cockroaches in real life, Tamriel will never be rid of them
  • Recap
    Recap
    Soul Shriven
    Neglecting home campaign for a title. Sweeeeeeeettttttt.
  • Jaxom
    Jaxom
    ✭✭✭✭
    Why not have 1 emperor and 2 former emperor (one per faction) that can have active passives at any given time. Once your faction crowns an emperor, the former emperor retains the title but loses the passives. Make the passives a buff that shows up in the character screen and doesn't require skill points to make this easier.

    this now balances the flipping and makes sense lorewise. Each faction will revel for their former emperor until dethroned. Old emperors are remembers aka titles but their effectiveness has fadded, ie no more buffs.
  • Recap
    Recap
    Soul Shriven
    On a side note, I hope they remove their Emperor titles since they're *** anyways. We didn't need the titles to gain our lead on Wabba, and we don't need them to maintain it. It's all for personal gain.
  • TheGrandAlliance
    TheGrandAlliance
    ✭✭✭✭
    Recap wrote: »
    On a side note, I hope they remove their Emperor titles since they're *** anyways. We didn't need the titles to gain our lead on Wabba, and we don't need them to maintain it. It's all for personal gain.

    Emperor Title Should Be Changed...

    Indeed it is so...
  • Malvokian
    Malvokian
    ✭✭
    Divine Reapers
  • leewells
    leewells
    ✭✭✭
    Malvokian wrote: »
    Divine Reapers

    Yes, I must admit, as the GM of Divine Reapers, we do conspire with AD to give us Emp, though we've only crowned a grand total of 5 while the faction has crowned somewhere in the range of 12, it was all us. We even psychically convinced DC not to join in the fight at all, and then we convinced the game Devs to give us the title without actually being crowned.

    Seriously dude, how about you take your personal grudges to tells? (Seriously, if you knew the dynamic between DR and Alacrity, you wouldn't have just gone full ***)

    No, Alacrity GM's have me on ignore; we trolled the hell out of them -- every time they would come to Bloodthorn to farm points, we'd go to Hopesfire to remove their scroll and home keep bonuses causing them to have to return to keep farming #communityjustice.
    Edited by leewells on 9 June 2014 16:44
  • cjmarsh725b14_ESO
    cjmarsh725b14_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭
    leewells wrote: »
    Malvokian wrote: »
    Divine Reapers

    Yes, I must admit, as the GM of Divine Reapers, we do conspire with AD to give us Emp, though we've only crowned a grand total of 5 while the faction has crowned somewhere in the range of 12, it was all us. We even psychically convinced DC not to join in the fight at all, and then we convinced the game Devs to give us the title without actually being crowned.

    Seriously dude, how about you take your personal grudges to tells? (Seriously, if you knew the dynamic between DR and Alacrity, you wouldn't have just gone full ***)

    No, Alacrity GM's have me on ignore; we trolled the hell out of them -- every time they would come to Bloodthorn to farm points, we'd go to Hopesfire to remove their scroll and home keep bonuses causing them to have to return to keep farming #communityjustice.
    So you're the leader of a guild who is farming emperors? Just because you didn't manage to get all of them within your guild doesn't make you less responsible for perpetuating the practice or encouraging it in the first place. You and your guild are no doubt a large part of the reason this is going on and I have no idea how you can even defend your actions, let alone do it so righteously.
  • leewells
    leewells
    ✭✭✭
    leewells wrote: »
    Malvokian wrote: »
    Divine Reapers

    Yes, I must admit, as the GM of Divine Reapers, we do conspire with AD to give us Emp, though we've only crowned a grand total of 5 while the faction has crowned somewhere in the range of 12, it was all us. We even psychically convinced DC not to join in the fight at all, and then we convinced the game Devs to give us the title without actually being crowned.

    Seriously dude, how about you take your personal grudges to tells? (Seriously, if you knew the dynamic between DR and Alacrity, you wouldn't have just gone full ***)

    No, Alacrity GM's have me on ignore; we trolled the hell out of them -- every time they would come to Bloodthorn to farm points, we'd go to Hopesfire to remove their scroll and home keep bonuses causing them to have to return to keep farming #communityjustice.
    So you're the leader of a guild who is farming emperors? Just because you didn't manage to get all of them within your guild doesn't make you less responsible for perpetuating the practice or encouraging it in the first place. You and your guild are no doubt a large part of the reason this is going on and I have no idea how you can even defend your actions, let alone do it so righteously.

    Let me clarify, our guild left another server for Celarus because of the drama on the previous server. That guild is mentioning our guild over and over again. Did we come here to farm emp? Technically, yes -- when we evaluated our options it came down to Wabbajack and Celarus: One was just starting meaning it was easier to secure the top of the boards, so we went to Celarus. Do we talk to the other side and arrange to yield keeps? No. While we log off when we secure emp, to speed up the process, we can't talk to AD on the other side because most of us are on their ignores lol (because our guild trolled them hard on their home server when they would come to our old server to farm us with full emp/keep/etc buffs as soon as we lost them), in fact I'm surprised they haven't put up a bigger resistance when we do log on and take emp.

    Did we cause this? I don't think so, but then again, with what we're doing -- pushing emp and then logging off (as its out of our raid times), I don't see a problem with it. I also don't see a problem with others doing the same thing; this is what Zenimax designed and intended to happen. The problem is, as time passes and smaller campaigns have more emps, people get but-hurt and start crying wolf hoping that zenimax will make them "special" and make what they have gained harder to earn. MMO's don't do this, they generally make things incredibly easier. While I disagree with carebearing the whole game, If they can't tolerate this or cope with it, then they should consider playing another genre of games. Skyrim is still playable.
    Edited by leewells on 9 June 2014 23:07
  • bruceb14_ESO5
    bruceb14_ESO5
    ✭✭✭
    Not sure who is involved, but doesn't matter. I've seen a large group sit on the outer walls of a keep, let a faction take over the keep. The keep turns gets emperor, other faction leaves without repairing and then the group comes in and takes back the keep. Hear in zone chat don't repair, don't hit the other group, don't defend...we all know the picture. Naming and shaming isn't necessary, it is about the abuses of the system in place and the rewards for those abuses.

    That is something ZOS can change.
  • the.dzeneralb16_ESO
    Thats fine, let them get emperor and wear their 'dunce' caps and hold their pitch forks on their 'throne'. The real men will be fighting a war on Wabba.

    Shoutout to all fighting on Wabba (even you DC and AD scum. <3 fun server)

    BLOOD FOR THE PACT
  • Observant
    Observant
    ✭✭✭✭
    The only thing that the Divine Reapers are guilty of, is being better at the game than yourselves. In all honesty, come in TS and see how an organized guild works, and how we earn that emp. You don't gain AP by standing around with your finger in your arse. We strategically move as a whole, and when this happens, the points roll in and we dominate the leader board. There's nothing wrong with being smart, nor is there anything wrong with wanting the strongest possible guild.

    P.S Divine Reapers recruiting VR6+, must have TeamSpeak and be able to follow orders.
    Vehemence
  • Observant
    Observant
    ✭✭✭✭

    I know they are whispering each other because I was doing well in a fight and the opposing leader whispered me thinking I was in charge and asking to let them have the keep so they could farm. It has nothing to do with time zones, the people in zone chat are openly coordinating the cycling of keeps to get emperor, it's not a secret in any way, shape, or form.

    Good proof bud. Really nailed down that argument. (*) Gold sticker for you.

    Back on topic... I think it's a great strategy. If people have their knickers in that much of a knot then please, humor me, what do we do that you do not? Other than having the top 10 on lock-down.

    Vehemence
  • tylarthb16_ESO
    tylarthb16_ESO
    ✭✭✭
    Emperor Farming should have been clamped down on as soon as it reared its ugly head. To me the title now tells me a player is a cheat and exploiter, which is a shame for the few who earned it on busy 90 day campaigns.

    Solution is simply to deactivate the former emperor passives, just have it as an emperor or nothing line/buff.
  • SilverWF
    SilverWF
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    This is EU Celarus?
    • PC EU. Ebonheart Pact. CP 1k+
    • YouTube: All ESO disguises (2014)
    • EU players are humans too! We want our maintenances in the least pop time (at deep night) and not lasted for several hours!
    • Animation canceR - is true PvP cancer! When you can't see which actions your opponent do - you can't react properly on them!
Sign In or Register to comment.