By all legal definitions, that would not satisfy compensation.
By all legal definitions, that would not satisfy compensation.
They don't have a legal or contractual obligation to compensate you. It's in the terms and conditions of both the game itself and ESO+.
By all legal definitions, that would not satisfy compensation.
They don't have a legal or contractual obligation to compensate you. It's in the terms and conditions of both the game itself and ESO+.
I doubt any form of ToS would supercede consumer's right to redress
By all legal definitions, that would not satisfy compensation.
They don't have a legal or contractual obligation to compensate you. It's in the terms and conditions of both the game itself and ESO+.
I doubt any form of ToS would supercede consumer's right to redress
Why do we need compensation for something beyond ZOS' control
imaslowlearner wrote: »
By all legal definitions, that would not satisfy compensation.
They don't have a legal or contractual obligation to compensate you. It's in the terms and conditions of both the game itself and ESO+.
I doubt any form of ToS would supercede consumer's right to redress
Z'en's Redress > consumer's right to redress
your move Mavloc
By all legal definitions, that would not satisfy compensation.
They don't have a legal or contractual obligation to compensate you. It's in the terms and conditions of both the game itself and ESO+.
I doubt any form of ToS would supercede consumer's right to redress
Why do we need compensation for something beyond ZOS' control