SilverBride wrote: »
People don’t have to use the latin alphabet, and it’s unlikely the filter system supports censoring more than few common languages’ character sets. Also, one can just resign uncensored words that are not commonly used to be “code” for the censored word it’s done all the time.
Inari Telvanni wrote: »TOS says,
" Content Moderation
To the extent that ZeniMax performs any content moderation of UGC to ensure its compatibility with these Terms of Service (including the Code of Conduct or any relevant EULA), such content moderation may be carried out via human review as well as through the use of AI-powered proactive and reactive moderation methods including without limitation, software that uses algorithmic decision making.
ZeniMax's proactive content moderation includes without limitation using tools to block and filter UGC that is illegal and/or incompatible with these Terms of Service.
Reactive content moderation methods include without limitation user reporting features which allow You to inform ZeniMax of the behavior or Content of other users that You have encountered which you believe is illegal and/or incompatible with these Terms of Service (including the Code of Conduct) and any such behaviour or Content can be reported to ZeniMax by contacting ZeniMax Customer Support at help.bethesda.net or help.elderscrollsonline.com. If You are in-Game, You can report an issue using an in-Game help feature where applicable. Where ZeniMax is required to do so by virtue of the Statutory Obligations (as defined in Section 1), ZeniMax shall advise You of remedial steps action taken against another user as a result of Your report including details of what steps ZeniMax has taken to investigate your report, if ZeniMax has removed Content that You have reported or if any other restrictions have been applied to the Content or the other user. "
This is an enormous red flag.
No it is not..
Zos, as a company that can be held liable for conversations that might happen through the use of their platform, have a responsibility to make sure that they can monitor illegal things being done in their game. Even if those things are done in private chats. If you are using their tools to do illegal things, they are legally put in a spot to intervene or face severe legal repurcussions if they do not.
'Illegal things.'
The whole game is about doing things illegal irl. Talking about the game would in that case be a bannable offence. They will need to be more sophisticated than key words.
This the only thing they might monitor in personal chat is scams and real money deals.tyran404_ESO wrote: »The problem lies in two things. This just doesn't effect RP. Below are two instances I've already had brought forward.
One Instance was a Private unreported PM that compared the far grave bubbles to something else. If neither consenting party in this pm was hurt why the disciplinary action? It is also an M rated game.
Another instance: Player tells a maelstrom arena boss to **** off in spacial chat, no one is around cause its maelstrom arena. They got flagged by the same automod. We wouldn't want the npcs feelings to get hurt i guess?
Secondly if it is a Bot doing? A Bot cannot understand or comprehend context. Which especially effects roleplayers.
Lets do an example of a roleplay scene, it is a combat between heroes and cultists: "Player A watches their friends suffer grievous wounds, they charge the menacing cultists and yell. "**** you!" as they charge with their sword out to end the cultists."
The bot could flag it and issue a automod warning if the example 2 is evidence.
Inari Telvanni wrote: »TOS says,
" Content Moderation
To the extent that ZeniMax performs any content moderation of UGC to ensure its compatibility with these Terms of Service (including the Code of Conduct or any relevant EULA), such content moderation may be carried out via human review as well as through the use of AI-powered proactive and reactive moderation methods including without limitation, software that uses algorithmic decision making.
ZeniMax's proactive content moderation includes without limitation using tools to block and filter UGC that is illegal and/or incompatible with these Terms of Service.
Reactive content moderation methods include without limitation user reporting features which allow You to inform ZeniMax of the behavior or Content of other users that You have encountered which you believe is illegal and/or incompatible with these Terms of Service (including the Code of Conduct) and any such behaviour or Content can be reported to ZeniMax by contacting ZeniMax Customer Support at help.bethesda.net or help.elderscrollsonline.com. If You are in-Game, You can report an issue using an in-Game help feature where applicable. Where ZeniMax is required to do so by virtue of the Statutory Obligations (as defined in Section 1), ZeniMax shall advise You of remedial steps action taken against another user as a result of Your report including details of what steps ZeniMax has taken to investigate your report, if ZeniMax has removed Content that You have reported or if any other restrictions have been applied to the Content or the other user. "
This is an enormous red flag.
No it is not..
Zos, as a company that can be held liable for conversations that might happen through the use of their platform, have a responsibility to make sure that they can monitor illegal things being done in their game. Even if those things are done in private chats. If you are using their tools to do illegal things, they are legally put in a spot to intervene or face severe legal repurcussions if they do not.
'Illegal things.'
The whole game is about doing things illegal irl. Talking about the game would in that case be a bannable offence. They will need to be more sophisticated than key words.
I mean, yes. Just like any chat or social media service is potentially liable for the planning or conducting of actual illegal activity with their service Zos is also beholden to that. If a group of people use whispers or group chat to plan a real crime, and Zos did not do everything within their power to prevent their service from being used for that manner, then they could be held liable for allowing that conduct. An entire platform recently is under fire for exactly this in Europe.
On PS/NA, several guilds use PSN voice chat instead of the ESO in game voice chat during trials. And I belong to a guild that sometimes uses PSN text chat instead of the ESO in game text chat.
On PC platforms, I have heard of guilds using Discord for voice chat during trials. And Discord has text chat.
Perhaps an alternate for your guild RP chat may help with your issue?
We shouldn't have to take RP out of game though, and again, it's not just RP this affects. It's any time someone says a ""naughty word"" or something. You can't even joke around with friends without risking getting banned or something.On PS/NA, several guilds use PSN voice chat instead of the ESO in game voice chat during trials. And I belong to a guild that sometimes uses PSN text chat instead of the ESO in game text chat.
On PC platforms, I have heard of guilds using Discord for voice chat during trials. And Discord has text chat.
Perhaps an alternate for your guild RP chat may help with your issue?
No voice chat on PC all used discord.On PS/NA, several guilds use PSN voice chat instead of the ESO in game voice chat during trials. And I belong to a guild that sometimes uses PSN text chat instead of the ESO in game text chat.
On PC platforms, I have heard of guilds using Discord for voice chat during trials. And Discord has text chat.
Perhaps an alternate for your guild RP chat may help with your issue?
Hi all, just wanted to chime in here. We’re looking into some of the questions in the thread and checking in with the team for feedback. Since it’s pretty late in the day on a Friday, we probably won’t have any feedback until earlier next week. But wanted to acknowledge that we’ve seen this and are investigating.
For now, anyone with ban issues, please make sure to put in an appeal and share your ticket number. Happy to pass those along.
Hi all, just wanted to chime in here. We’re looking into some of the questions in the thread and checking in with the team for feedback. Since it’s pretty late in the day on a Friday, we probably won’t have any feedback until earlier next week. But wanted to acknowledge that we’ve seen this and are investigating.
For now, anyone with ban issues, please make sure to put in an appeal and share your ticket number. Happy to pass those along.
Hi all, just wanted to chime in here. We’re looking into some of the questions in the thread and checking in with the team for feedback. Since it’s pretty late in the day on a Friday, we probably won’t have any feedback until earlier next week. But wanted to acknowledge that we’ve seen this and are investigating.
For now, anyone with ban issues, please make sure to put in an appeal and share your ticket number. Happy to pass those along.
tsaescishoeshiner wrote: »If you get an unreasonable automod ban, appeal it with a support ticket, and make a forum post with your ticket asking for help. A screenshot of what the specific phrase they say you're banned for could help.
If it starts to cost more staff time to correct these errors, the program might be adjusted, reduced, or sidelined.
So appeal, and encourage your friends to do the same.
(Sometimes, game news sites look at popular subreddit posts.)
The problem is, the screenshot going around is from an appeal apparently, and it says that the suspension is going to stay in place because it was correctly handed out. So like...obviously I don't know what the context for that appeal was but it worries me that people getting warned, suspended, or banned might stay as such even if everyone involved in any given chat was okay with it.
We really just need to not be Big Brother'd to death. People can report offensive language, so why take action against literally everything if 90% of it isn't being reported because it's either RP or just people bantering or joking around with each other?
Like CS is going to waste a lot more time reviewing appeals for people unjustly caught by a bot than they would reviewing reports made by actual people.
tsaescishoeshiner wrote: »tsaescishoeshiner wrote: »If you get an unreasonable automod ban, appeal it with a support ticket, and make a forum post with your ticket asking for help. A screenshot of what the specific phrase they say you're banned for could help.
If it starts to cost more staff time to correct these errors, the program might be adjusted, reduced, or sidelined.
So appeal, and encourage your friends to do the same.
(Sometimes, game news sites look at popular subreddit posts.)
The problem is, the screenshot going around is from an appeal apparently, and it says that the suspension is going to stay in place because it was correctly handed out. So like...obviously I don't know what the context for that appeal was but it worries me that people getting warned, suspended, or banned might stay as such even if everyone involved in any given chat was okay with it.
We really just need to not be Big Brother'd to death. People can report offensive language, so why take action against literally everything if 90% of it isn't being reported because it's either RP or just people bantering or joking around with each other?
Like CS is going to waste a lot more time reviewing appeals for people unjustly caught by a bot than they would reviewing reports made by actual people.
Exactly! That's why appealing it and keeping tickets open, and publicly posting to get ticket help, is important and can help everyone.
We'll see what they say next week, and how many appeals have to be made.
As long as you reply to a response you have received (even if that response is to "close" the ticket, you shouldn't be returned to the "back of the queue".
Zos shouldn't ban words or phrases in game, or ban those using them.
Because context is everything, and bots can't judge context, they shouldn't be used to judge language.
Zos shouldn't ban words or phrases in game, or ban those using them.
Because context is everything, and bots can't judge context, they shouldn't be used to judge language.