RaddlemanNumber7 wrote: »So, what I'm seeing here is that someone pulled this totally baseless concept of an Aurbic Phoenix out of their back pocket for TESV in 4E 201. And that is now serving as some sort of inverted precedent for 2E 582, a year in which schools of magic are barely more than a proposal being pitched by Gabrielle Benele.
Long, long ago, before there were any people at all; even before the gods, Tamriel was chosen as a battleground by two -- things. It is difficult to find words that fit them well. I call them the Light and the Dark. Others use different names. Good and Evil, Bird and Serpent, Order and Chaos. None of these names really apply. It suffices that they are opposites, and totally antithetical. Neither is really good or evil, as we know the words. They are immortal since they do not really live, but they do exist. Even the gods and their daedric enemies are pale reflections of the eternal conflict between them. It's as though their struggle creates energies that distort their surroundings, and those energies are so powerful that life can appear, like an eddy in a stream."
Konstant_Tel_Necris wrote: »Perhaps answer is there https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:The_Light_and_the_Dark
Long, long ago, before there were any people at all; even before the gods, Tamriel was chosen as a battleground by two -- things. It is difficult to find words that fit them well. I call them the Light and the Dark. Others use different names. Good and Evil, Bird and Serpent, Order and Chaos. None of these names really apply. It suffices that they are opposites, and totally antithetical. Neither is really good or evil, as we know the words. They are immortal since they do not really live, but they do exist. Even the gods and their daedric enemies are pale reflections of the eternal conflict between them. It's as though their struggle creates energies that distort their surroundings, and those energies are so powerful that life can appear, like an eddy in a stream."
colossalvoids wrote: »It's just one of the magic school tapestries, no need to assign any more deeper significance to the motif at hand, it's not some new cosmology but a fancy name for a symbol.
RaddlemanNumber7 wrote: »So, what I'm seeing here is that someone pulled this totally baseless concept of an Aurbic Phoenix out of their back pocket for TESV in 4E 201. And that is now serving as some sort of inverted precedent for 2E 582, a year in which schools of magic are barely more than a proposal being pitched by Gabrielle Benele.
That's a good point, taking the chronology in mind. It would be a good question for the Loremaster, but I don't think they are in the forums.
Supreme_Atromancer wrote: »colossalvoids wrote: »It's just one of the magic school tapestries, no need to assign any more deeper significance to the motif at hand, it's not some new cosmology but a fancy name for a symbol.
Its Elder Scrolls lore. Assigning more deeper significance to literally everything is what we do.