Note that for an Argonian "Fart loudly" is pretty lore friendly.It's not cool to call out players like this, and it certainly isn't helping the eso "community". I'm surprised this thread isn't closed yet.
Following your logic the thread about gold sellers should also be closed, because they are calling out on gold sellers.
Those names are very often a violation of the terms of use everyone agreed on. Just like gold selling.
Which is entirely subjective, but in my experience what I said earlier is the usual case.elfindreams wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Only those the enjoy ruining others play experiences report names.Stonebreath wrote: »For those names that do violate the TOS is there a way to report the person in game?
Only those who enjoy ruining others play experiences use names that need reporting.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Which is entirely subjective, but in my experience what I said earlier is the usual case.elfindreams wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Only those the enjoy ruining others play experiences report names.Stonebreath wrote: »For those names that do violate the TOS is there a way to report the person in game?
Only those who enjoy ruining others play experiences use names that need reporting.
elfindreams wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Which is entirely subjective, but in my experience what I said earlier is the usual case.elfindreams wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Only those the enjoy ruining others play experiences report names.Stonebreath wrote: »For those names that do violate the TOS is there a way to report the person in game?
Only those who enjoy ruining others play experiences use names that need reporting.
My point is everything involving an online game is subjective. Activity you might consider "no big deal" can disrupt the playability for another. That is why game designers put in limits in gameplay and why game publishers put out code of conducts and EULAs. Regrettably EULAs have become so... legalease... that ignoring them and not reading them has become habitual but ultimately parts of them are there to keep everyone happy or at least as many as can be.
To your specific point, it has been my experience that people that report names do so out of frustration after seeing yet another expletive filled or lore breaking or just plain unreadable name after another. It has nothing to do with ruining anyone else's play because the worst that ever happens is they are forced to rename their character... it is about having their own play ruined.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »elfindreams wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Which is entirely subjective, but in my experience what I said earlier is the usual case.elfindreams wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Only those the enjoy ruining others play experiences report names.Stonebreath wrote: »For those names that do violate the TOS is there a way to report the person in game?
Only those who enjoy ruining others play experiences use names that need reporting.
My point is everything involving an online game is subjective. Activity you might consider "no big deal" can disrupt the playability for another. That is why game designers put in limits in gameplay and why game publishers put out code of conducts and EULAs. Regrettably EULAs have become so... legalease... that ignoring them and not reading them has become habitual but ultimately parts of them are there to keep everyone happy or at least as many as can be.
To your specific point, it has been my experience that people that report names do so out of frustration after seeing yet another expletive filled or lore breaking or just plain unreadable name after another. It has nothing to do with ruining anyone else's play because the worst that ever happens is they are forced to rename their character... it is about having their own play ruined.
But does it even matter? You cant see names unless you are actively looking at said person, and if a name you cant see somehow offends you because its another Legolas, just unclick the focus and voila no name to see.
elfindreams wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »elfindreams wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Which is entirely subjective, but in my experience what I said earlier is the usual case.elfindreams wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Only those the enjoy ruining others play experiences report names.Stonebreath wrote: »For those names that do violate the TOS is there a way to report the person in game?
Only those who enjoy ruining others play experiences use names that need reporting.
My point is everything involving an online game is subjective. Activity you might consider "no big deal" can disrupt the playability for another. That is why game designers put in limits in gameplay and why game publishers put out code of conducts and EULAs. Regrettably EULAs have become so... legalease... that ignoring them and not reading them has become habitual but ultimately parts of them are there to keep everyone happy or at least as many as can be.
To your specific point, it has been my experience that people that report names do so out of frustration after seeing yet another expletive filled or lore breaking or just plain unreadable name after another. It has nothing to do with ruining anyone else's play because the worst that ever happens is they are forced to rename their character... it is about having their own play ruined.
But does it even matter? You cant see names unless you are actively looking at said person, and if a name you cant see somehow offends you because its another Legolas, just unclick the focus and voila no name to see.
Oh agreed, that is why not having nameplates is a good thing, it is also why I haven't bothered reporting any names in this game. I am only expanding on my opinions on the subject because there is still active discussion about enabling nameplates and setting the boundaries and expectations now will save a lot of people a lot of problems if they do.
I was thinking more along the lines of offensive names in the chat not in the game world.Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »But does it even matter? You cant see names unless you are actively looking at said person, and if a name you cant see somehow offends you because its another Legolas, just unclick the focus and voila no name to see.
I saw a Fippy Darkpaw but that was me. It may ring a bell to some of the oldest here
DrPopkorne wrote: »I saw a Khajit in the typical style of naming called.. Dies-very-often. Although I believe without dashes. Brought a smirk to my face anyway.
Only those who don't care about the game would use those names in the first place.Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Only those the enjoy ruining others play experiences report names.Stonebreath wrote: »For those names that do violate the TOS is there a way to report the person in game?
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Only those the enjoy ruining others play experiences report names.Stonebreath wrote: »For those names that do violate the TOS is there a way to report the person in game?
gstewart0413b14_ESO wrote: »DrPopkorne wrote: »I saw a Khajit in the typical style of naming called.. Dies-very-often. Although I believe without dashes. Brought a smirk to my face anyway.
Love the name but, that is the Argonian<sp> naming style. Khajit would be DiesVery'often
I am assuming you know of the book? Many argonian players seem to like to use The Lusty Argonian Maid as a reference for their name.I giggled last night when I saw a female Argonian near the stables named "A-Lusty-Maid", if IIRC in the betas there was an Argonian named "Desirable-Housekeeper" too.. wonder if it's the same player.