thankyourat wrote: »Lol so many sorc threads
brandishsteel wrote: »exactly what I am talking about
paulsimonps wrote: »We really don't, if anything we need to buff the classes that are under performing to get them up to speed.
paulsimonps wrote: »We really don't, if anything we need to buff the classes that are under performing to get them up to speed.
D0ntevenL1ft wrote: »I noticed how everyone who disagreed had "sorc" in their profile. Whats annoying is when sorcs just sit there with shields standing in mines while empowering every attack with entropy.
As a wise man once said: "I'm more about putting down areas of protection and I want to stand in these, and like this is, this is sort of like my house and if you come into my house it's gonna be bad for you".
Who knew Wrobel was actually talking about sorcs?
Judas Helviaryn wrote: »Don't incorporate bugs into your builds, and you won't have [an] issue.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »the real problem is that the developers do not actively and daily play eso.
you might see them play for 1 video or a short presentation but they are not playing daily like we are.
so they really do not know what we see and what we are meaning when we request nerfs or buffs.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »the real problem is that the developers do not actively and daily play eso.
you might see them play for 1 video or a short presentation but they are not playing daily like we are.
so they really do not know what we see and what we are meaning when we request nerfs or buffs.
No we can't keep buffing classes. Every time they buffed classes they have gone to far. All classes need a damage nerfs and slight buffs not any more needless buff that Wrobel didn't test.paulsimonps wrote: »We really don't, if anything we need to buff the classes that are under performing to get them up to speed.