Jprip88b16_ESO wrote: »What was that timberlake song again?!
Jprip88b16_ESO wrote: »What was that timberlake song again?!
*** in a box
StihlReign wrote: »The NB class is hampered by the dev's decision to give one of it's base skills to everyone via potions. (invis & detect pots)
There should also be potions available to each class with a core skill from the other classes.
Emma_Eunjung wrote: »StihlReign wrote: »The NB class is hampered by the dev's decision to give one of it's base skills to everyone via potions. (invis & detect pots)
There should also be potions available to each class with a core skill from the other classes.
One thing I know FOR SURE about the devs is that they have in no way, shape or form "hampered" Nightblades.
Sheesh.
Wait, just thought of something. Tri-pots give resource regen, but green dragon blood gives those too, guessing ZOS could remove those so that dk's can reign supreme with that unique trait of regenerating resources over time. Honestly, invisibility has always been available from reagents and illusion spells, and if cloak is the only thing you think nightblades have...
StihlReign wrote: »Wait, just thought of something. Tri-pots give resource regen, but green dragon blood gives those too, guessing ZOS could remove those so that dk's can reign supreme with that unique trait of regenerating resources over time. Honestly, invisibility has always been available from reagents and illusion spells, and if cloak is the only thing you think nightblades have...
This makes no sense. No potion functions the way green dragon's blood does.
You're being silly. Don't be silly.
"and if cloak is the only thing you think"...lol
Did you read the OP? Perhaps you were responding to someone else....
StihlReign wrote: »Wait, just thought of something. Tri-pots give resource regen, but green dragon blood gives those too, guessing ZOS could remove those so that dk's can reign supreme with that unique trait of regenerating resources over time. Honestly, invisibility has always been available from reagents and illusion spells, and if cloak is the only thing you think nightblades have...
This makes no sense. No potion functions the way green dragon's blood does.
You're being silly. Don't be silly.
"and if cloak is the only thing you think"...lol
Did you read the OP? Perhaps you were responding to someone else....
Yes, and thinking nightblades should 'own' invisibility when in the elder scrolls universe it is available from potions and skills is just as silly as saying dragonknights should have a monopoly on major regen buffs and any potion that provides those deprives the class of their uniqueness.
StihlReign wrote: »StihlReign wrote: »Wait, just thought of something. Tri-pots give resource regen, but green dragon blood gives those too, guessing ZOS could remove those so that dk's can reign supreme with that unique trait of regenerating resources over time. Honestly, invisibility has always been available from reagents and illusion spells, and if cloak is the only thing you think nightblades have...
This makes no sense. No potion functions the way green dragon's blood does.
You're being silly. Don't be silly.
"and if cloak is the only thing you think"...lol
Did you read the OP? Perhaps you were responding to someone else....
Yes, and thinking nightblades should 'own' invisibility when in the elder scrolls universe it is available from potions and skills is just as silly as saying dragonknights should have a monopoly on major regen buffs and any potion that provides those deprives the class of their uniqueness.
Your argument is a logical fallacy and cannot be taken seriously. Please address the topic directly rather than use strawman arguments that make little sense in their comparisons.
StihlReign wrote: »Wait, just thought of something. Tri-pots give resource regen, but green dragon blood gives those too, guessing ZOS could remove those so that dk's can reign supreme with that unique trait of regenerating resources over time. Honestly, invisibility has always been available from reagents and illusion spells, and if cloak is the only thing you think nightblades have...
This makes no sense. No potion functions the way green dragon's blood does.
You're being silly. Don't be silly.
"and if cloak is the only thing you think"...lol
Did you read the OP? Perhaps you were responding to someone else....
Wait, just thought of something. Tri-pots give resource regen, but green dragon blood gives those too, guessing ZOS could remove those so that dk's can reign supreme with that unique trait of regenerating resources over time. Honestly, invisibility has always been available from reagents and illusion spells, and if cloak is the only thing you think nightblades have...
radiant. f*ing. aura.
StihlReign wrote: »StihlReign wrote: »Wait, just thought of something. Tri-pots give resource regen, but green dragon blood gives those too, guessing ZOS could remove those so that dk's can reign supreme with that unique trait of regenerating resources over time. Honestly, invisibility has always been available from reagents and illusion spells, and if cloak is the only thing you think nightblades have...
This makes no sense. No potion functions the way green dragon's blood does.
You're being silly. Don't be silly.
"and if cloak is the only thing you think"...lol
Did you read the OP? Perhaps you were responding to someone else....
Yes, and thinking nightblades should 'own' invisibility when in the elder scrolls universe it is available from potions and skills is just as silly as saying dragonknights should have a monopoly on major regen buffs and any potion that provides those deprives the class of their uniqueness.
Your argument is a logical fallacy and cannot be taken seriously. Please address the topic directly rather than use strawman arguments that make little sense in their comparisons.
Fine, here's one. Invisibility is a buff, major regen is a buff. Bolt, talons and jabs are all active skills. There is no potion that triggers an active skill.
StihlReign wrote: »Wait, just thought of something. Tri-pots give resource regen, but green dragon blood gives those too, guessing ZOS could remove those so that dk's can reign supreme with that unique trait of regenerating resources over time. Honestly, invisibility has always been available from reagents and illusion spells, and if cloak is the only thing you think nightblades have...
This makes no sense. No potion functions the way green dragon's blood does.
You're being silly. Don't be silly.
"and if cloak is the only thing you think"...lol
Did you read the OP? Perhaps you were responding to someone else....
radiant. f*ing. aura.
A skill entirely subsumed by the SECONDARY effect of tripots which also have 100% uptime. But obviously, cloak has the same cooldown invis pots have and teh dot remobing part is of course part of the potion and not the skill... sure sure
StihlReign wrote: »StihlReign wrote: »StihlReign wrote: »Wait, just thought of something. Tri-pots give resource regen, but green dragon blood gives those too, guessing ZOS could remove those so that dk's can reign supreme with that unique trait of regenerating resources over time. Honestly, invisibility has always been available from reagents and illusion spells, and if cloak is the only thing you think nightblades have...
This makes no sense. No potion functions the way green dragon's blood does.
You're being silly. Don't be silly.
"and if cloak is the only thing you think"...lol
Did you read the OP? Perhaps you were responding to someone else....
Yes, and thinking nightblades should 'own' invisibility when in the elder scrolls universe it is available from potions and skills is just as silly as saying dragonknights should have a monopoly on major regen buffs and any potion that provides those deprives the class of their uniqueness.
Your argument is a logical fallacy and cannot be taken seriously. Please address the topic directly rather than use strawman arguments that make little sense in their comparisons.
Fine, here's one. Invisibility is a buff, major regen is a buff. Bolt, talons and jabs are all active skills. There is no potion that triggers an active skill.
Invisibility (Cloak and it's morphs) are a NB skill.
StihlReign wrote: »StihlReign wrote: »StihlReign wrote: »Wait, just thought of something. Tri-pots give resource regen, but green dragon blood gives those too, guessing ZOS could remove those so that dk's can reign supreme with that unique trait of regenerating resources over time. Honestly, invisibility has always been available from reagents and illusion spells, and if cloak is the only thing you think nightblades have...
This makes no sense. No potion functions the way green dragon's blood does.
You're being silly. Don't be silly.
"and if cloak is the only thing you think"...lol
Did you read the OP? Perhaps you were responding to someone else....
Yes, and thinking nightblades should 'own' invisibility when in the elder scrolls universe it is available from potions and skills is just as silly as saying dragonknights should have a monopoly on major regen buffs and any potion that provides those deprives the class of their uniqueness.
Your argument is a logical fallacy and cannot be taken seriously. Please address the topic directly rather than use strawman arguments that make little sense in their comparisons.
Fine, here's one. Invisibility is a buff, major regen is a buff. Bolt, talons and jabs are all active skills. There is no potion that triggers an active skill.
Invisibility (Cloak and it's morphs) are a NB skill.
StihlReign wrote: »StihlReign wrote: »StihlReign wrote: »Wait, just thought of something. Tri-pots give resource regen, but green dragon blood gives those too, guessing ZOS could remove those so that dk's can reign supreme with that unique trait of regenerating resources over time. Honestly, invisibility has always been available from reagents and illusion spells, and if cloak is the only thing you think nightblades have...
This makes no sense. No potion functions the way green dragon's blood does.
You're being silly. Don't be silly.
"and if cloak is the only thing you think"...lol
Did you read the OP? Perhaps you were responding to someone else....
Yes, and thinking nightblades should 'own' invisibility when in the elder scrolls universe it is available from potions and skills is just as silly as saying dragonknights should have a monopoly on major regen buffs and any potion that provides those deprives the class of their uniqueness.
Your argument is a logical fallacy and cannot be taken seriously. Please address the topic directly rather than use strawman arguments that make little sense in their comparisons.
Fine, here's one. Invisibility is a buff, major regen is a buff. Bolt, talons and jabs are all active skills. There is no potion that triggers an active skill.
Invisibility (Cloak and it's morphs) are a NB skill.
Cloak ⊂ Invisbility sources
There are also invibility potions and Clouding Swarm. Further Cloak has secondary effects besides the invisbility buff as well, wich make the skill much more functional than the invisibility potions plus the latter have a cooldown so you can not reenter invisibility after being detected. Clouding Swarm gives visual clues, applies a self snare and doesn't purge DoTs/projectiles, but the invisbility can not be broken without potions or Mark Target.
So no, there are ways to gain the main effect Cloak provides, but there is certainly not a "Cloak potion".