Maintenance for the week of January 6:
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – January 8, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 8:00AM EST (13:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – January 8, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 13:00 UTC (8:00AM EST)
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – January 8, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 8:00AM EST (13:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – January 8, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 13:00 UTC (8:00AM EST)
Redguard Female Light. I think the new is just boring and terrible.
-
Shadesofkin✭✭✭✭✭
✭Call me weird but I actually appreciate that TES do not have clothing/armour styles that cater to 14-year old boys :P
Very well, you are weird.
But no, seriously, I'm not impressed with the styles.5 -
Islyn✭✭✭✭✭
✭
Yep. Comparison pics. Scroll up to see the female version and Red Rook disguise. This is basically the same thing that happened to low level Redguard light armor.
Oh myyy - terrible.
PLEASE rethink this ZOS?2 -
Islyn✭✭✭✭✭
✭Maybe we should all leave a feedback?
I don't think it helps any more but - maybe?
ZOS - is there any chance of just leaving these changes out? Or something?
@ZOS_GinaBruno2 -
Islyn✭✭✭✭✭
✭I don't think that's the reason. ESO didn't have any outfits so revealing that they could cause problems. Also, I don't see why consoles automatically mean more kids playing, but okay.
The most reasonable explanation seems to be that they want to sell us attractive outfits in the crown store, so they're uglifying existing ones. Pretty much the same thing they've done with XP gain. We'll see soon enough, when new costumes start rolling in.
@ZOS_GinaBruno
Is the above true?
Will anyone actually answer this?0 -
technohic✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭
I don't think that's the reason. ESO didn't have any outfits so revealing that they could cause problems. Also, I don't see why consoles automatically mean more kids playing, but okay.Artemiisia wrote: »we talked about it in guild and came to a theory about why they are removing all these boob windows.
Since the game is going to be released onto consuls, more kids will start to play it, and they probably wont wanna offend anyone with showing a little skin, even with a M-Rated game
One thing though, if people wanted to, they can still go "naked", so yeah there are still flaws in the theroy
The most reasonable explanation seems to be that they want to sell us attractive outfits in the crown store, so they're uglifying existing ones. Pretty much the same thing they've done with XP gain. We'll see soon enough, when new costumes start rolling in.
Yeah, this is what I expect. In SWTOR, they took things that were low level and had no use at end game just people liked the looks of them, then my modifiable skin versions later on available on the cartel shop.0 -
AlnilamE✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭What level is that Redguard armor? My sorc was wearing a set that came in Redguard at V4 and she looked like a musketeer!
The seadrake disguise can be obtained again by just going to the location and killing one of the mobs.
I've done that a couple of times. Though as others said, it's changing in 1.6 and does not look as nice anymore.
Dunmer light is not as nice in V10+, unfortunately. At least in my opinion.The Moot Councillor0 -
Islyn✭✭✭✭✭
✭V9. The Legs and Hands and Shoulders are Imperial.
I did the Q so I have to do and do it on an alt
- but not sure it will work ads the one ZOS mailed me doesn't work. Edited by Islyn on 26 February 2015 17:460 -
Emma_Overload✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Totally disagree with the OP!
The old RG Light was ugly. I like the new stuff much better.#CAREBEARMASTERRACE0 -
Islyn✭✭✭✭✭
✭Emma_Eunjung wrote: »Totally disagree with the OP!
The old RG Light was ugly. I like the new stuff much better.
Whaaaat? The new stuff is plain boring and looks like it belong in The Original Star Trek6 -
Rosveen✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭To be fair, I liked the original Star Trek. I'm just not sure if I want Star Trek in my Elder Scrolls.4 -
Blud✭✭✭✭✭Artemiisia wrote: »
I stand corrected. if this is true
2014 survey
This is interesting, but need a source.
1 -
Blud✭✭✭✭✭Rune_Relic wrote: »
So we have armour that is falling apart needing repair kits.
We have soulgems that seem to take forever to gain with the soul passives now.
Then we have a dumbing down of costumes.
...definitely looks like cash shop compulsion to me.
Is this true? I haven't been on the PTS, really. What's this about armour falling apart? Has the durability been effectively reduced? And what's the deal with soul gems?
If this is true, I think it's not a good sign at all.1 -
Rosveen✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭
It's from ESA's annual Essential Facts About the Computer and Video Game Industry.Artemiisia wrote: »
I stand corrected. if this is true
2014 survey
This is interesting, but need a source.
1 -
driosketch✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭
Sadly yes.
I can see someone already linked my post.
Yep. Comparison pics. Scroll up to see the female version and Red Rook disguise. This is basically the same thing that happened to low level Redguard light armor.
Main: Drio Azul ~ DC, Redguard, Healer/Magicka Templar ~ NA-PC
●The Psijic Order●The Sidekick Order●Great House Hlaalu●Bal-Busters●0 -
Seradwyn✭✭I think all the light armor robes are fugly. I've seen gunny sacks with more style. Hate the hip floaters. It would be really nice to see some interesting necklines, bizarre sleeves, an ankle maybe?, and some skin. If you're a caster you shouldn't be so close to get hit so you don't need a whole lot of armor protection but something to distract might be nice.
5 -
Maverick827✭✭✭✭✭
✭A lot of those studies equates "made one match in Bejeweled before closing the app and uninstalling it" to "gamer."
Things are getting better, but they're not that good yet.0 -
Divad Zarn✭✭✭New one is great, it looks like more.. styled and classic version, while old one was more like for kids cuz of those many many different paintings and boobs but still its only my opinion, just let people know that there are guys who like new one more 1 -
Locke_ESO✭✭✭Rune_Relic wrote: »Then we have a dumbing down of costumes.
...definitely looks like cash shop compulsion to me.
This seems the most likely reason. I've seen at least 3-4 threads now with people saying how they are almost universally disappointed with the new Redguard armour. Why did they even bother asking for feedback on PTS if they aren't listening? The current Redguard armour sets needed some smoothing out but overall the design was fine.
5 -
Morana✭✭✭I'm really worried this is a ploy to bring the original designs into the cash shop as costume pieces. "Oh look, remember these old armour pieces? Well they're back for you to own once again!"
If so... who do I give "the look" to? You know the one that can stop a husband dead in his tracks frozen in dread... that look. Fear it.3 -
Islyn✭✭✭✭✭
✭I'm really worried this is a ploy to bring the original designs into the cash shop as costume pieces. "Oh look, remember these old armour pieces? Well they're back for you to own once again!"
If so... who do I give "the look" to? You know the one that can stop a husband dead in his tracks frozen in dread... that look. Fear it.
I dunno because these husbands are the look you in the face and lie type - so. No idea.2 -
Islyn✭✭✭✭✭
✭What boDivad Zarn wrote: »New one is great, it looks like more.. styled and classic version, while old one was more like for kids cuz of those many many different paintings and boobs but still its only my opinion, just let people know that there are guys who like new one more
WHAT boobs??!?2 -
cyqa✭✭✭Yeah, I really prefer the first one. I don't like the new look at all. The first one had more character, the new one is basic and bland.5 -
Artemiisia✭✭✭✭✭
✭Artemiisia wrote: »
I stand corrected. if this is true
2014 survey
This is interesting, but need a source.
Full Article here
Gamers
0 -
Elloa✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭There is several thread about this matter already, but I wanted to react to this....Call me weird but I actually appreciate that TES do not have clothing/armour styles that cater to 14-year old boys :P
In which way any of the armor of ESO was cattering 14years old kids? There is nothing inproper, over-the-top in the old redguard Light armor model. It's not because an armor is a little bit seducive, a little bit "sexy" (in a Lore fitting way° that's its made to catter 14y old kids. Seriously...That's really a amazingly short sighted argument.
Yes, it was showing off the belly, and had a little clivage. What's wrong with that? The way it was stylised, with several layers of clothes, large belt, silk fabric, and sandals, was properly illustrating the outfit of a desert-culture. It was elegant, seducive, mysterious, exotic!
The new model looks nothing like you would imagine from the Redgard. It's too warm, to blant, too boring. It looks like a Breton had to design a "redguard dress". Beside the better texture, the new model seriously lack of imagination, creativity. The previous model had really its unique style! I'll miss it dearly!5 -
Rosveen✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭
In my book that's as much of a gamer as "play nothing but FIFA and Madden until my eyes bleed". But I don't disagree with you.Maverick827 wrote: »A lot of those studies equates "made one match in Bejeweled before closing the app and uninstalling it" to "gamer."
Things are getting better, but they're not that good yet.1 -
MornaBaine✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭I don't think that's the reason. ESO didn't have any outfits so revealing that they could cause problems. Also, I don't see why consoles automatically mean more kids playing, but okay.
The most reasonable explanation seems to be that they want to sell us attractive outfits in the crown store, so they're uglifying existing ones. Pretty much the same thing they've done with XP gain. We'll see soon enough, when new costumes start rolling in.
@ZOS_GinaBruno
Is the above true?
Will anyone actually answer this?
Yes. And, No.PAWS (Positively Against Wrip-off Stuff) - Say No to Crown Crates!0
