So, they are just randomly patching stuff cause they really have no idea what is going on in hopes it fixes itself..
What we are seeing is an "incremental patch" and not necessarily a series of failures. They may simply be releasing improvements as they discover them rather than holding those back until the big fix is discovered.
Which sounds more plausible to you, that they are randomly patching stuff in the hopes that they succeed or releasing incremental patches as they stated they were doing.
Don't you think that if ZOS were actually smart enough to do that... they'd not have caused this problem in the first place?
This is non sequitur.
______
Occam's razor can easily avoid explanations that take part in added assumptions like conspiracy theories and unsubstantiated speculation.
I get the frustration backed comments, I am saying them myself every day during this fps nightmare. However when it gets down to the reality of the matter I take them at their word that it is their number one priority.
Read what you just wrote... and with that in mind, reread what you wrote earlier:What we are seeing is an "incremental patch" and not necessarily a series of failures. They may simply be releasing improvements as they discover them rather than holding those back until the big fix is discovered.
That is an explanation not based on assumption, but an explanation based on a actual comment made by ZOS which is also why I quoted it.
You've assumed the quote is more than PR.
No it is your added assumption that it is only PR.
Since you seem to be pushing a moot point without knowing it I think you should refresh yourself on occams razor. It does not say the explanation without any assumption but rather the explanation with the least assumptions.
Agrippa_Invisus wrote: »Another former Shadowbaner I see.Permafrost wrote: »I unsubbed. I'm giving them until Thursday to change my mind and make me renew or I'm done. This reeks of SB.EXE ERROR.
SB was more stable than this most days.
So, they are just randomly patching stuff cause they really have no idea what is going on in hopes it fixes itself..
What we are seeing is an "incremental patch" and not necessarily a series of failures. They may simply be releasing improvements as they discover them rather than holding those back until the big fix is discovered.
bbowling1776b14_ESO wrote: »For those of you new to the MMO/gaming world, trust me when I say that the problem we're seeing is infinitesimal compared to what other games have experienced. Over the past 15 years, having played games such as The Realm Online, Ultima Online, EverQuest I and II (brief), World of Warcraft (up to Pandaria), Lord of the Rings (brief), Age of Conan (brief), Rift, Aion (brief), Guild Wars II, and Dark Age of Camelot (my best years and best PvP/RvR...) this continues to be the overall best launch I've ever experienced. Period and paragraph.
bbowling1776b14_ESO wrote: »If you feel that a recent reduction of frame rate in Cyrodiil constitutes the cancelling of your subscription, then so be it; I think it's ridiculously premature, especially for a game that you claim to have been enjoying until now. Cyrodiil IS the end-game and should be. Read a book, work on crafting, make an alt, go outside, do something other than agonize over it.
ferzalrwb17_ESO wrote: »
So, they are just randomly patching stuff cause they really have no idea what is going on in hopes it fixes itself..
What we are seeing is an "incremental patch" and not necessarily a series of failures. They may simply be releasing improvements as they discover them rather than holding those back until the big fix is discovered.
Which sounds more plausible to you, that they are randomly patching stuff in the hopes that they succeed or releasing incremental patches as they stated they were doing.
Don't you think that if ZOS were actually smart enough to do that... they'd not have caused this problem in the first place?
This is non sequitur.
______
Occam's razor can easily avoid explanations that take part in added assumptions like conspiracy theories and unsubstantiated speculation.
I get the frustration backed comments, I am saying them myself every day during this fps nightmare. However when it gets down to the reality of the matter I take them at their word that it is their number one priority.
Read what you just wrote... and with that in mind, reread what you wrote earlier:What we are seeing is an "incremental patch" and not necessarily a series of failures. They may simply be releasing improvements as they discover them rather than holding those back until the big fix is discovered.
That is an explanation not based on assumption, but an explanation based on a actual comment made by ZOS which is also why I quoted it.
You've assumed the quote is more than PR.
No it is your added assumption that it is only PR.
Since you seem to be pushing a moot point without knowing it I think you should refresh yourself on occams razor. It does not say the explanation without any assumption but rather the explanation with the least assumptions.
The explanation with the least assumptions is that it's PR.
We understand and respect the frustration in regards to the performance issues. We have our Engineering and QA teams currently working on tracking down and testing several things that we believe are contributing to the problem. This is a bit of a nebulous issue, as it has several contributing factors. Each time we nail down a contributing factor and fix it, we push that fix live. We promise to continue to keep you updated, and we do apologize that the issue is still persisting.