Dleatherus wrote: »Huckdabuck wrote: »I could actually see the 1 per person limit as being really OMFG OP when it comes to zergs in the larger campaigns unless they had something along the lines of only 1 siege engine per 30-50m but then you run into the same "well 1 guys puts out 1 siege engine to stop you" routine.....imagine a 200 person zerg with 200 siege engines hitting a keep. OUCH
yeah - agreed - you could ring a whole keep with a 200 man zerg and fully tear everything down in under a minute!
bad suggestion on my part
back to the drawing board
D.
Hahahaha. Well it really is. They are despicable, if you ask me.
If the base problem here is that once someone gets emp in a 90 day campaign its nearly impossible to supplant them, so people are going to celarus to farm emp so they have a chance to get it, why not exclude emps from leaderboard AP......as in they still gain it as a currency, but it doesn't add to their score on the leaderboards, that way should they be dethroned someone working hard to gain ap could possibly supplant them? or as someone else said decrease the emp's ap gain so they can still be competetive but not guarantee'd to regain should keep control be re-established.
Jessica Folsom wrote:It's a very grey area.
First of all, have I ever once said anything about how you people play the game? Besides that fact, Whos the dictator Chip? Need I mention your régime?
Yes, how dare anyone farm anything in this game. How dare they play this game in any fashion than what you dictate. And I suffer from Pseudologia fantastica? Sounds like you have a great case for narcissism there bub.
If you're pissed we abandoned bloodthorn and refused to help you get emp, just come out with it and say so, stop beating around the bush.
First of all, have I ever once said anything about how you people play the game? Besides that fact, Whos the dictator Chip? Need I mention your régime?
Yes, how dare anyone farm anything in this game. How dare they play this game in any fashion than what you dictate. And I suffer from Pseudologia fantastica? Sounds like you have a great case for narcissism there bub.
If you're pissed we abandoned bloodthorn and refused to help you get emp, just come out with it and say so, stop beating around the bush.
I can care less about Emperorship. But truthfully, BT has been a much better place after you and your brainwashed filth have left. But I am sad to see that you set up your filthshop on Celarus. Stooping so low to work with the enemy. At the cost of other players fun. Doesn't that go against your own rules?
Hows your roster btw? I heard its hurting.
Hahahaha. Well it really is. They are despicable, if you ask me.
Of the 23 members you had left after the 30+ left you're *** up guild for ours.
Oh I believe you did, how about you read your posts before vomiting your drivel all over the interwebz.
Better you say? That's kinda odd. I heard you guys had to get a few other guilds to come in and provide assistance. But hey, if it is better, then more power to you, we hope you guys have fun, because we sure are.
And dictatorship you say? Yeah, you caught me red-handed, we elect our officer and I dictate it is official. We elect our sergeants and officers can demote them. Yep, red-handed.
Oh, right, I remember now, that dictatorship you are mentioning is when there was a 23 to 1 guild vote to boot you and a few others from the guild. I get it now -- yeah, that was a dictatorship indeed.
Of the 23 members you had left after the 30+ left you're *** up guild for ours.
Oh I believe you did, how about you read your posts before vomiting your drivel all over the interwebz.
Better you say? That's kinda odd. I heard you guys had to get a few other guilds to come in and provide assistance. But hey, if it is better, then more power to you, we hope you guys have fun, because we sure are.
And dictatorship you say? Yeah, you caught me red-handed, we elect our officer and I dictate it is official. We elect our sergeants and officers can demote them. Yep, red-handed.
Oh, right, I remember now, that dictatorship you are mentioning is when there was a 23 to 1 guild vote to boot you and a few others from the guild. I get it now -- yeah, that was a dictatorship indeed.
Jessica Folsom wrote:It's a very grey area.
The Hypocrisy is you thinking your *** up guild rule applied to our guild. Which was formed on the foundation of Troll.Oh, right, I remember now, that dictatorship you are mentioning is when there was a 23 (to kick) to 1 guild vote to boot you and a few others from the guild. That WAS just 15 mins before a 8 to 15 (not to kick) vote that literally changed as soon as you and HIJINX showed your arses in guild chat. I get it now -- yeah, that was a dictatorship indeed. Oh but wait a second, where was the vote when our members were kicked from Hijinx (which happened before the vote)? Am I smelling some hypocrisy here? I think so.
But I appreciate your concern about our roster -- its doing great actually, 78 people online last night, and we're about to absorb a guild where the GM has gone awol adding another 50+.
The Hypocrisy is you thinking your *** up guild rule applied to our guild. Which was formed on the foundation of Troll.Oh, right, I remember now, that dictatorship you are mentioning is when there was a 23 (to kick) to 1 guild vote to boot you and a few others from the guild. That WAS just 15 mins before a 8 to 15 (not to kick) vote that literally changed as soon as you and HIJINX showed your arses in guild chat. I get it now -- yeah, that was a dictatorship indeed. Oh but wait a second, where was the vote when our members were kicked from Hijinx (which happened before the vote)? Am I smelling some hypocrisy here? I think so.
But I appreciate your concern about our roster -- its doing great actually, 78 people online last night, and we're about to absorb a guild where the GM has gone awol adding another 50+.
So you can write a wall of text trying to plead your point. I really don't care. Its obvious you cant count.
ZOS_PierreL wrote: »Hey everyone.
Please keep the conversation on-topic and constructive. It's okay to disagree, but personal attacks are never acceptable on the forums.
If this thread doesn't go back in a good way, we will close it.
Thanks.
ZOS_PierreL wrote: »Hey everyone.
Please keep the conversation on-topic and constructive. It's okay to disagree, but personal attacks are never acceptable on the forums.
If this thread doesn't go back in a good way, we will close it.
Thanks.
Ohh my bad. of those 253 people. Almost all of your PvP ACTIVES left (Or were kicked because of butthurtness.) What you had left were PvE'rs You couldn't field a single group for a week and we know it. You think you have spies? Let me tell you, we have a few of our own. You boast numbers sure. But active PvP veterans you lack.
So, my bad, I lied, we had 3 more than 250.
Only blew the whistle on the perps(At least the known EP that have been causing grief and sickness on the server by doing). But sorry ZoS_Pierrel. Ill keep it more on topic.ZOS_PierreL wrote: »Hey everyone.
Please keep the conversation on-topic and constructive. It's okay to disagree, but personal attacks are never acceptable on the forums.
If this thread doesn't go back in a good way, we will close it.
Thanks.
Ohh my bad. of those 253 people. Almost all of your PvP ACTIVES left (Or were kicked because of butthurtness.) What you had left were PvE'rs You couldn't field a single group for a week and we know it. You think you have spies? Let me tell you, we have a few of our own. You boast numbers sure. But active PvP veterans you lack.
So, my bad, I lied, we had 3 more than 250.
Honestly the same people I have been PvP'ing with for a month now, are the same people. It didn't change. Why cant you admit you fubar?
But back on topic. I think that the 2 week campaign should be looked at because the emp farming is getting out of hand. Also it is at the expense of all the players there. Maybe remove emperorship from that campaign.
Fshober28b14_ESO wrote: »Thanks for the heads up, this will start to catch fire in other campaigns sooner than later. Thank you for this post, I am passionate about pvp too and want to support anything viable that ZoS can do to help keep Cyrodiil Campaigns legit!
The one showing your roster full of inactives. yeah.
No date/time on them. Still not even close to a full raid. Half of them are in PvE. Please give more ammo tho.
The one showing your roster full of inactives. yeah.
You should likely take a look at the edit...I knew that was coming. Drama queens are the same in every game.
No date/time on them. Still not even close to a full raid. Half of them are in PvE. Please give more ammo tho.
The one showing your roster full of inactives. yeah.
You should likely take a look at the edit...I knew that was coming. Drama queens are the same in every game.
No date/time on them. Still not even close to a full raid. Half of them are in PvE. Please give more ammo tho.
The one showing your roster full of inactives. yeah.
You should likely take a look at the edit...I knew that was coming. Drama queens are the same in every game.
Oh yeah, my bad, you're not in the guild to verify it. Being that's the only way you could verify it, nice try bub.
ZOS_PierreL wrote: »Hey everyone.
Please keep the conversation on-topic and constructive. It's okay to disagree, but personal attacks are never acceptable on the forums.
If this thread doesn't go back in a good way, we will close it.
Thanks.
No date/time on them. Still not even close to a full raid. Half of them are in PvE. Please give more ammo tho.
The one showing your roster full of inactives. yeah.
You should likely take a look at the edit...I knew that was coming. Drama queens are the same in every game.
Oh yeah, my bad, you're not in the guild to verify it. Being that's the only way you could verify it, nice try bub.
Im not but I have my connections. You will never guess who it is either.