Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Funcom is exactly why europe doesnt have ANY good mmos coming from there. Will funcom finally go under please!
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Funcom is exactly why europe doesnt have ANY good mmos coming from there. Will funcom finally go under please!
Three Words: The. Secret. World.
Awesome game.
I kinda feel sorry for ZOS. They're caught between the whiners who rushed to VR 10 in 3 days and are on the forums wenching about lack of end-game and people who just want the damned game fixed already.
Yes, if there was anything to lift from AoC it would be the fatalities. AoC had very good animation generally.NerfEverything wrote: »All of this will be forgiven if ESO adds fatalities.
The inexperience of the developers and the rushing with patches is right now the core reason the game is failing (i said failing, not failed)
It wasn't tested. The PTR went full-out Craglorn. The devs had assumed that when the person tasked with adjusting the VP of the mobs did their job, they wouldn't accidentally change anything else. Oops."Unintended" increase in difficulty in VR mobs (seriously, how did testing not weed this out?)
You play in short batches, log out, submit report, log back in. The memory leak only became a noticeable issue over time... which you wouldn't see in a two hour gameplay...Memory leak causing total computer lockup and game crashes (seriously, how did testing not weed this out?)
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Funcom is exactly why europe doesnt have ANY good mmos coming from there. Will funcom finally go under please!
daneyulebub17_ESO wrote: »
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Funcom is exactly why europe doesnt have ANY good mmos coming from there. Will funcom finally go under please!
Three Words: The. Secret. World.
Awesome game.
I kinda feel sorry for ZOS. They're caught between the whiners who rushed to VR 10 in 3 days and are on the forums wenching about lack of end-game and people who just want the damned game fixed already.
That is your opinion. I happen to think TSW is one of the most fun, creative, interesting (and bug free) MMO's I've played in about a decade. It only lacked meaningful crafting, but had the best storyline and immersion in any game in a long, long time.Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Funcom is exactly why europe doesnt have ANY good mmos coming from there. Will funcom finally go under please!
Three Words: The. Secret. World.
Awesome game.
I kinda feel sorry for ZOS. They're caught between the whiners who rushed to VR 10 in 3 days and are on the forums wenching about lack of end-game and people who just want the damned game fixed already.
Game is actually crappy too, I know I own the lifetime to it, I just log in every few months to not lose the free points.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Funcom is exactly why europe doesnt have ANY good mmos coming from there. Will funcom finally go under please!
Phantorang wrote: »daneyulebub17_ESO wrote: »
Either would be hyperbole, so what's the difference?
The difference is Failed is in the past and failing is now.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Funcom is exactly why europe doesnt have ANY good mmos coming from there. Will funcom finally go under please!
Three Words: The. Secret. World.
Awesome game.
I kinda feel sorry for ZOS. They're caught between the whiners who rushed to VR 10 in 3 days and are on the forums wenching about lack of end-game and people who just want the damned game fixed already.
You're completely wrong in your last paragraph.
Upping the VR levels is bad game design, as most people hate it.
We have people duoing or soloing bosses meant for four people that has nothing to do with rushing to max level.
We have people duoing the first Craglorn Trials bosses. Content meant for 12 is being done by two.
25% of your playerbase is playing a broken class at the moment. And they push back Nightblade fixes another 6 weeks.
There are fundamental problems with the game that have nothing to do with people complaining about end game content. These fundamental problems exist because of improper testing and bug fixing and bad game design decisions.
daneyulebub17_ESO wrote: »Phantorang wrote: »daneyulebub17_ESO wrote: »
Either would be hyperbole, so what's the difference?
The difference is Failed is in the past and failing is now.
But since both are unsubstantiated hyperbole, unless you're privy to some actual piece of information I'm not aware of (other than "I don't like something", "some of my guildies quit" or "youtube review") then it makes no difference at all which is used.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Funcom is exactly why europe doesnt have ANY good mmos coming from there. Will funcom finally go under please!
Three Words: The. Secret. World.
Awesome game.
I kinda feel sorry for ZOS. They're caught between the whiners who rushed to VR 10 in 3 days and are on the forums wenching about lack of end-game and people who just want the damned game fixed already.
To late for ESO.
The exodus has already begun.
And, word is now out that EOS *IS* another AoC.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Funcom is exactly why europe doesnt have ANY good mmos coming from there. Will funcom finally go under please!
Three Words: The. Secret. World.
Awesome game.
I kinda feel sorry for ZOS. They're caught between the whiners who rushed to VR 10 in 3 days and are on the forums wenching about lack of end-game and people who just want the damned game fixed already.