Basing on the logic of yours, we should have leaderboards reset with 2.0.11 as well, because of food-buffs improvement for total of +1,5k in basic stat(s), which means more magicka/stamina = more damage = better time = better result.
Please keep in mind that there were numerous exploits removed from Trials post-1.6 (Mantikora trap, Ra-kotu spawn retrigger etc.) which could lead to leaderboards reset argument, but they didn't. They also didn't prevent people from getting better results with or without those bugs.
In the end, PvP bonus removal will affect more the Trials meta-game than fair-play. In practice, it will cause different Ultimate selection and rotation during the raids to maintain similar buffs.
Also, keep in mind, that average CP amount per is group is still growing and there is no such thing as stable Trials-meta anymore. As of 17th June, we estimate 320-400 CP per player to be optimal, which will obviously change over months, so will the CP focus and distribution (of which Arcane Well passive gain is one of bigger milestones, for example). We could argue then that the group didn't have the same chances with/without certain CP passive "because it could, but it didn't, so it's not fair" and so on... This is simply pointless.
What I agree with, however, is that the food buff improvement might have been implemented simultaneously with PvP bonuses removal - just to avoid such discussions.
This argument is invalid. The same will happen with CP-per-group increase which will eventually cover the PvP random bonuses gain/loss. Additionally, the lack of PvP bonuses will affect Trials-meta (or skill selection, if you'd prefer) more rather than the average point results (for example - you may like to focus maintaining Aggresive Horn more during longer fights).Very good points. I disagree about the exploits being cause for leaderboard reset - scores have already improved since the fixes so none of the top scores are due to known exploits.
This is the exact possible difference with the extra stats, actually. Knowing that, food-buffs should actually make you want reset the leaderboards as much as PvP bonuses do.PvP buffs are unstable, some of us do trials consistently without buffs, yet with buffs each DD in our team would be hitting 2-3K more DPS - that is a MUCH larger difference than 1.5K extra stat boost
Unfortunately, quite the opposite. The most important CPs are only first hundreds - here's why:With regards to CP (...) A difference of 1000 CP will make a large difference, but a hundred or so really isn't game-breaking.
I understand you're saying this from top leaderboards player perspective thus based on a proper insight into pro-team Trials raid mechanics?This argument is invalid. The same will happen with CP-per-group increase which will eventually cover the PvP random bonuses gain/loss. Additionally, the lack of PvP bonuses will affect Trials-meta (or skill selection, if you'd prefer) more rather than the stability of possible point results (for example - you may like to focus maintaining Aggresive Horn more during longer fights).Very good points. I disagree about the exploits being cause for leaderboard reset - scores have already improved since the fixes so none of the top scores are due to known exploits.This is the exact possible difference with the extra stats, actually. Knowing that, food-buffs should actually make you want reset the leaderboards as much as PvP bonuses do.PvP buffs are unstable, some of us do trials consistently without buffs, yet with buffs each DD in our team would be hitting 2-3K more DPS - that is a MUCH larger difference than 1.5K extra stat boostUnfortunately, quite the opposite. The most important CPs are only first hundreds and let me copy/paste myself to explain why:With regards to CP (...) A difference of 1000 CP will make a large difference, but a hundred or so really isn't game-breaking.
"With either 360 CP or 3600 CP you still would have no more than +25% to your DPS abilities, healing done etc. Collecting additional bonuses that obviously are not related to your role/build, will not benefit you in OP way."
Reset the leaderboards but also allow a version filter so view times from older versions of the game
Reset the leaderboards but also allow a version filter so view times from older versions of the game
Interesting idea. It would be fun to have even seen pre1.6 scores too by a similar filter, just for nostalgia's sake. Often there are forums detailing trial progression though, so people could keep track of scores they had before any major changes.
They won't do this. It will show that all sistem is now timebased + mobs killing and HM bonus score without death tax. Wanna high score - do it HM and as fast as you can. It's still better then it was, but you can always hear from them smth like this " we don't want to show our score formula as it is".
Unfortunately, quite the opposite. The most important CPs are only first hundreds - here's why:
"With either 360 CP or 3600 CP you still would have no more than +25% to your DPS abilities, healing done etc. Collecting additional bonuses that obviously are not related to your role/build, will not benefit you in OP way."
vortexman11 wrote: »Why's this in the Alliance War section?
There's talk of ZOS finally removing PvP buffs from PvE to effectively level the playing field and remove the concept of "buff campaigns". This poll asks whether people feel the leaderboards should be reset in such an eventuality.
See forum for more details:
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/180480/pvp-update-june-2015
vortexman11 wrote: »Why's this in the Alliance War section?
This is not a PvP topic. Why must you bring such crazy nonsense to the alliance section
Of course you should reset the leaderboards. PVP buffs have been an unfair advantage to all those fortunate enough to have friendly buff servers for weeks and months at a time. Now that we're close to being done with a convoluted system that rewarded high end pve'rs with bonuses due to faction imbalance, night capping, etc. we should embrace a clean start, one that leaves us with a more balanced reflection of player performance.
AhPook_Is_Here wrote: »I think they should reset it. Having said that, does every faction still have at least one guild that does trials for competitive scores? Maybe there isn't even a need for a board anymore?