Leftover_Pizza wrote: »Sylvermynx wrote: »If you're on PC, I'd be happy to send you a couple hundred k gold - I've played a long time, have lots....
That's a very generous offer and very much appreciated. Sadly, this offer considered, I play on PS5.
Many thanks for the offer! I'll get more fortunate eventually.
Sylvermynx wrote: »Leftover_Pizza wrote: »Sylvermynx wrote: »If you're on PC, I'd be happy to send you a couple hundred k gold - I've played a long time, have lots....
That's a very generous offer and very much appreciated. Sadly, this offer considered, I play on PS5.
Many thanks for the offer! I'll get more fortunate eventually.
Aw. Well, here's hoping you can start banging out writs then!
No, simply NO!
Could do with NOTHING being account wide
Either the character has or it does not!
Leftover_Pizza wrote: »So, still no valid reasons other than the gold cap? How much is that cap exactly? And if the cap is too low, doesn't that mean the economy is broken? The cap must be there for a reason. And if it is not, it could be raised quite easily by ZOS.
I'm still saying yes to a shared gold pool.
Leftover_Pizza wrote: »So, still no valid reasons other than the gold cap? How much is that cap exactly? And if the cap is too low, doesn't that mean the economy is broken? The cap must be there for a reason. And if it is not, it could be raised quite easily by ZOS.
I'm still saying yes to a shared gold pool.
The cap is usually due to how coding works. I remember for Runescape (a 20 year old MMO still going now) the cap was something like 2.5 Billion or something. So if it's anywhere near that for us in ESO, I would say the cap is not any reason at all, no one will get anywhere close to that, except maybe bots....
Leftover_Pizza wrote: »Leftover_Pizza wrote: »So, still no valid reasons other than the gold cap? How much is that cap exactly? And if the cap is too low, doesn't that mean the economy is broken? The cap must be there for a reason. And if it is not, it could be raised quite easily by ZOS.
I'm still saying yes to a shared gold pool.
The cap is usually due to how coding works. I remember for Runescape (a 20 year old MMO still going now) the cap was something like 2.5 Billion or something. So if it's anywhere near that for us in ESO, I would say the cap is not any reason at all, no one will get anywhere close to that, except maybe bots....
Can't find an answer to what the gold cap actually is, but if it is anywhere near that amount, I doubt indeed that many players will reach it. Me for certain.
WoW has a cap of 10 billion per account and 10 million per character, as far as I know. Never seen anyone reach it and that economy is seriously broken.
Leftover_Pizza wrote: »So, still no valid reasons other than the gold cap? How much is that cap exactly? And if the cap is too low, doesn't that mean the economy is broken? The cap must be there for a reason. And if it is not, it could be raised quite easily by ZOS.
I'm still saying yes to a shared gold pool.
Leftover_Pizza wrote: »Yet, there is not a really convincing reason to why it is a bad idea to have the gold pool shared without the need of a bank.
So, for me, the pro to have all the gold available for all characters at any time and place, outweighs the cons mentioned.
Sylvermynx wrote: »Leftover_Pizza wrote: »Leftover_Pizza wrote: »So, still no valid reasons other than the gold cap? How much is that cap exactly? And if the cap is too low, doesn't that mean the economy is broken? The cap must be there for a reason. And if it is not, it could be raised quite easily by ZOS.
I'm still saying yes to a shared gold pool.
The cap is usually due to how coding works. I remember for Runescape (a 20 year old MMO still going now) the cap was something like 2.5 Billion or something. So if it's anywhere near that for us in ESO, I would say the cap is not any reason at all, no one will get anywhere close to that, except maybe bots....
Can't find an answer to what the gold cap actually is, but if it is anywhere near that amount, I doubt indeed that many players will reach it. Me for certain.
WoW has a cap of 10 billion per account and 10 million per character, as far as I know. Never seen anyone reach it and that economy is seriously broken.
I left ~9.5 million each on my Shadowsong and Icecrown mains when I quit WoW in 2013.
etchedpixels wrote: »Leftover_Pizza wrote: »Yet, there is not a really convincing reason to why it is a bad idea to have the gold pool shared without the need of a bank.
So, for me, the pro to have all the gold available for all characters at any time and place, outweighs the cons mentioned.
It breaks PvP for one.
In the PvP space there are no assistants available (Khajiit is scared of PvP but will pop up for you in a Molag Bal boss fight, this one does not understand) and not being able to pull random objects out of your bank in the middle of a siege is somewhat important.
For PvE there's also a management issue. If you have 200 slots per toon and 18 toons thats 3600 items carried and having them in one inventory would be a nightmare.
Leftover_Pizza wrote: »Sylvermynx wrote: »Leftover_Pizza wrote: »
Can't find an answer to what the gold cap actually is, but if it is anywhere near that amount, I doubt indeed that many players will reach it. Me for certain.
WoW has a cap of 10 billion per account and 10 million per character, as far as I know. Never seen anyone reach it and that economy is seriously broken.
I left ~9.5 million each on my Shadowsong and Icecrown mains when I quit WoW in 2013.
I left several toons with millions there too, quit in 2018. If there was anything I could bring to this game, it wasn't the gold pile, but my Tauren druid and Prot pala.....
You made me reflect back at ICC....., I really had good times running that raid. Oh, the good ol' days.....
phaneub17_ESO wrote: »The only things I want shared are all the accidental recipes and furnishing plans I learned on alts that I meant to save for my main. Gamepad mode has that stupid disadvantage of putting recipes in the top box and reading them by accident is a problem, game devs are laughing their butts off at console and PC gamepad players.
Sylvermynx wrote: »Leftover_Pizza wrote: »Sylvermynx wrote: »Leftover_Pizza wrote: »
Can't find an answer to what the gold cap actually is, but if it is anywhere near that amount, I doubt indeed that many players will reach it. Me for certain.
WoW has a cap of 10 billion per account and 10 million per character, as far as I know. Never seen anyone reach it and that economy is seriously broken.
I left ~9.5 million each on my Shadowsong and Icecrown mains when I quit WoW in 2013.
I left several toons with millions there too, quit in 2018. If there was anything I could bring to this game, it wasn't the gold pile, but my Tauren druid and Prot pala.....
You made me reflect back at ICC....., I really had good times running that raid. Oh, the good ol' days.....
Yeah. My family guilds on both server ran that SO many times. We quit when it got to be autopilot, went on to something else. Some of my family still play, but I've never been back. Nor to RIFT which I played from 2013 to 2016.
Leftover_Pizza wrote: »Mounts, small pets, skins, houses, materials, stickerbooks, appearances, companions, paints, furniture and much more, why not fully share the gold pool?
Why keep the gold per character, while gold can be shared via the shared bank already? Do we really need the extra steps for getting some gold to an alt's pockets?
What is the reason why gold isn't in an accountwide purse?
Thoughts on why yes and why not.
I, for one, would like to see the gold pool accountwide. Much easier when buying something from (guild)traders or doing some changes at the outfitters, without going to the bank to withdraw what other characters have put in there first.
Your thoughts please.
James-Wayne wrote: »I like to save gold where I cant see it, its a nice surprise when you need gold and stumble onto a character you havent opened in months
I just want shared mount speed. OR the option to purchase more than one at a time, OR all points at once for an increased amount of gold.