SeaArcanist wrote: »Princessrhaenyra wrote: »SeaArcanist wrote: »i understand people don't use commonsense in pvp, and avoid sets like crimson that offers a 2s gap you can move out of the way from. even if ya dont move though. 1v1 its laughable damage and a minor heal. in 1vx, it can be a great heal fighting novices who dont know how to get out of aoe's. which is why i stated "90% of the community truly doesnt get pvp". is it REALLY that hard to avoid an aoe wit ha 2 second heads up? and is crimson relaly that pwoerful? no. absolutly not. the math is right there.
Bashing 90% of the community wow.
it's not bash, just as im sure 90% of the community also arnt experts on trials, and 90% of those who pvp, give or take, arnt experts in pve.
You know that crimson isn't affected by battlespirt when it hits NPCs right? In other words, run into 4 enemy guards standing on the flags and you can get a 50k heal from it.
Princessrhaenyra wrote: »SeaArcanist wrote: »Princessrhaenyra wrote: »SeaArcanist wrote: »i understand people don't use commonsense in pvp, and avoid sets like crimson that offers a 2s gap you can move out of the way from. even if ya dont move though. 1v1 its laughable damage and a minor heal. in 1vx, it can be a great heal fighting novices who dont know how to get out of aoe's. which is why i stated "90% of the community truly doesnt get pvp". is it REALLY that hard to avoid an aoe wit ha 2 second heads up? and is crimson relaly that pwoerful? no. absolutly not. the math is right there.
Bashing 90% of the community wow.
it's not bash, just as im sure 90% of the community also arnt experts on trials, and 90% of those who pvp, give or take, arnt experts in pve.
To me you are bashing. Anyone who hasn't agreed with you, your replies are extremely condescending. 90% is a made up number with no data behind it.
barney2525 wrote: »It always amazes me when one person's personal opinion, that person declares their conclusions to be Fact and if you disagree, You are just wrong.
There is not one single piece of actual 'data' that can be shown as hard evidence. It is all a string of explanations of various circumstances that the OP believes - and Thus they declare them to be Facts.
All this perspective has ever done, in any debate, is to guarantee that the OP will not listen to opposing points of view.
And if the OP is not going to listen, why should anyone listen to them?